Objective To observe the influence of hospital -community -family -individual 4 -level intervention model on schizophrenia patients in compliance,recurrence rate,psychotic symptom,social function,quali-ty of life and provide guidance for disease management.Methods 198 schizophrenia patients were divided into 4 -level intervention model group and conventional intervention group.After 6 moths follow -up,the effect was evaluated by compliance rate,recurrence rate,BPRS,WHO -DASII,SQLS.Results After the intervention for 6 months,the compliance,recurrence rate,the difference of severity of psychotic symptom,the difference of social function of the 4 -level intervention model group were 96.74%,13.04%,(7.57 ±2.83)points,[understanding and communication (6.32 ±3.64)points,physical exercise (5.16 ±3.28)points,self care (2.87 ±1.38)points,get on well with others (9.05 ±3.51)points,life activity (5.42 ±2.49)points,social participation (7.85 ±3.28)points],which of conven-tional intervention group were 74.74%,28.42%,(4.86 ±1.24)points,[understanding and communication (3.89 ± 1.86)points,physical exercise (2.80 ±1.238)points,self care (2.19 ±1.16)points,get on well with others (5.83 ± 3.04)points,life activity (3.41 ±1.96)points,social participation (4.27 ±2.17)points],the differences between the two groups were significant (χ2 =9.020,P =0.003;χ2 =6.932,P =0.009;t =8.527,P =0.000;t =5.775,P =0.000;t =6.554,P =0.000;t =3.652,P =0.000;t =6.712,P =0.000;t =6.144,P =0.000;t =8.829,P =0.000).The differences of before intervention and after intervention in the 4 -level intervention model group were psychological society (16.03 ±6.75)points,power and energy (15.79 ±6.41 )points,symptoms and side effects (19.37 ±7.28 )points,which in the conventional intervention group were psychological society (12.65 ± 5.46)points,power and energy (11.81 ±4.71 )points,symptoms and side effects (15.18 ±6.29 )points,the differences were statistically significant between the two groups (t =3.770,P =0.000;t =4.849,P =0.000;t =4.216,P =0.000).Conclusion Hospital -community -family -individual 4 -level intervention model has a positive effect on schizophrenia patients,which is worthy of clinical promotion.

Objective　To investigate the relationship between the degree of cervical lesions and the status of paired box-1 (PAX1) and tumor protein 63(TP63) gene promoter methylation in human papillomavirus (HPV)-positive patients with cervical lesions, as well as analyze their clinical significance. Methods Cervical tissue specimens were collected from 128 patients who were suspected of cervical lesions and HPV infection, and admitted to Qionghai People's Hospital between December 2021 and December 2022. According to pathological examination results, the patients were divided into the low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (LSIL) group (n=43), high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (HSIL) group (n=51) and cervical cancer group (n=34). The second-generation hybrid capture method was used for viral load. The degree of PAX1 and TP63 gene promoter methylation in each group was detected by bisulfite sequencing, and mRNA expression of PAX1 and TP63 was detected by real-time quantitative PCR. The diagnostic performance of the degree of PAX1 and TP63 methylation for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN2+) was evaluated. Results There were statistically significant differences in HR-HPV viral load between the groups (P>0.05). A total of 49 (38.28%) patients with PAX1 gene promoter methylation, and 55 (42.97%) patients with TP63 gene promoter methylation were detected among the 128 patients. The percentages of PAX1 and TP63 gene promoter methylation in the cervical cancer group, HSIL group and LSIL group were (67.65% and 73.53%), (43.14% and 49.02%) and (9.30% and 11.63%), with statistically significant differences between groups (P<0.05). The mRNA expression levels of PAX1 and TP63 in the cervical cancer group, HSIL group and LSIL group were [(0.34±0.08) and (0.45±0.13)], [(0.72±0.11) and (0.63±0.09)], [(1.04±0.09) and (0.87±0.11)], with statistically significant differences between groups (P<0.05). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis showed that the area under the curve (AUC) values of PAX1, TP63 gene promoter methylation, and their combination for diagnosing CIN2+ were 0.793, 0.842, and 0.857, respectively. The sensitivity values were 77.78%, 83.33%, and 77.78%. The specificity values were 80.85%, 85.11%, and 93.62%. The combined detection can improve the specificity of diagnosis of CIN2+ lesions. Conclusions The degree of PAX1 and TP63 gene promoter methylation is closely related to cervical lesions in patients with HPV infection, which indicates that it can be used as potential auxiliary indicators for the clinical diagnosis of CIN2+lesions.

ObjectiveTo establish a vaginal self-sampling HPV cervical cancer screening model in Hainan Province, to analyze the application of p16 protein detection in HPV positive and non-HPV16 /18 shunt screening. MethodsFrom January 2019 to September 2022, a total of 200 women from the targeted population was randomly selected for vaginal self-sampling HPV typing test to screen cervical cancer using randomized numeric table method, followed by cervical cytology sampling for cytology p16 protein detection. Postoperative pathological examination was used as the gold standard. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to analyze the influencing factors of HPV positive detection rate in cervical lesions, and the nomogram model was constructed simultaneously. The receiver operating characteristic(ROC) curve and calibration curve were used for evaluating the accuracy of the nomogram model. Differences in the distribution of self-sampled HPV-positive and HPV infected genotypes were recorded, and the application of p16 protein detection in HPV-positive and non-HPV16/18 shunt screening was analyzed. ResultsAged ≥40 years, BMI ≥28.00 kg·m^-2, number of sexual partners ≥2, frequency of sexual life ≥10 times·month^-1, bleeding from sexual intercourse, and age of first sexual intercourse <22 years were the risk factors for HPV positive of cervical lesions (all P<0.001). The results of ROC curve and calibration curve showed that the area under ROC curve (AUC) was 0.874 (95%CI: 0.823‒0.907, P<0.05), the sensitivity was 0.835, the specificity was 0.847, and the Youden index was 0.672, indicating a good fit of the model. Results of vaginal self-sampling HPV test showed that the positive rate of HPV was 86.50% (173/200). HPV high-risk infection types mainly included HPV16, 18, 31, 33, 35, 39, 45, 52, 56, 58, 59, 68, 73, and 82. Single HPV infection accounted for 95.95% (166/173), 2.89% (5/173) were infected with two types of HPV, and 1.16% (2/173) were infected with three or more types of HPV. Colposcopic pathologic diagnosis was used as the gold standard, and the results showed that the accuracy of p16 protein detection in the diagnosis of cervical cancer was 93.50% (187/200), with a sensitivity of 96.53% (167/173), and a specificity of 74.07% (20/27). The negative and positive predictive value were 76.92% (20/26) and 95.98% (167/174), respectively. The results of shunt screening showed that there were 80 cases infected with HPV16, 79 cases infected with HPV18 and 41 cases of non-HPV16/18, with a sensitivity of 90.91%, 90.32% and 86.67%, a specificity of 71.43%, 64.71% and 72.73%, a negative predictive value of 62.50%, 64.71% and 66.67%, a positive predictive value of 93.75%, 90.32% and 89.66%, and an accuracy of 87.50%, 84.81% and 82.93%, respectively. The specificity and accuracy of p16 positive screening for cervical cancer were significantly higher than that of HPV positive detection, but the false positive rate was significantly lower than that of HPV positive detection. The AUCs of HPV positive, p16 positive and combination of the two detection methods for cervical cancer were 0.603, 0.822 and 0.907, respectively. ConclusionVaginal self-sampling HPV testing is a widely accepted mode for cervical cancer screening. Cervical cytology p16 protein detection is important for self-sampled HPV positive and shunt screening of non-HPV16/18.