1.Implantation of arc-track private lock pedicle orthopedic fixation system Ⅱ for treatment of spinal diseases in 86 cases
Yongjun YANG ; Jiping ZHOU ; Enzhong ZHANG ; Xiuwu DUAN ; Yongan SHI
Chinese Journal of Tissue Engineering Research 2009;13(35):6982-6986
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effects of arc-track private lock pedicle orthopedic fixation system Ⅱ (ALPF Ⅱ) on treatment of spinal diseases. METHODS: A total of 86 patients with spinal diseases were treated using self-made ALPF in the Wendeng Orthopaedic Hospital and were included in this study. Of these patients, 14 suffered from cervical spinal stenosis complicated by cervical vertebral destabilization, 29 from thoracolumbar fractures and dislocations, 15 from lumbar spinal stenosis complicated by lumbar vertebral destabilization, 2 from lumbar spondylolisthesis, 8 from spinal tuberculosis, 6 from ankylosing spondylitis, 9 from idiopathic scoliosis, and 3 from congenital scoliosis. According to conditions, different therapeutic regimens were selected. Postoperatively, regular follow-up was performed to observe vertebral healing, intervertebral height, spinal column sequence, and neurological function recovery. RESULTS: All patients were followed up for 9-30 months (average 12 months). The improvement rate of neurological function, spinal mobility, back pain, and melosalgia was 94.1%, 65.9%, 92.1%, and 87.4%, respectively. The postoperative anterior and posterior vertebral heights were apparently recovered, and kyphotic angle was well corrected. No screw, rod loosening or breakage was found. CONCLUSION: Self-made ALPF Ⅱ is an internal fixation method for treatment of spinal diseases. It provides good reduction, reliable curative effects, less complications, and no biocompatibilities.
2.The effect of local vibration of the tibial nerve on triceps surae spasticity after stroke and its mechanism
Juanjuan FU ; Hongxing WANG ; Pei WANG ; Ting ZHOU ; Hui FENG ; Xiuwu ZHOU ; Huaping PAN
Chinese Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 2021;43(5):391-395
Objective:To explore the effect of tibial nerve vibration on triceps surae spasticity in stroke survivors and its electrophysiological mechanism.Methods:Thirty stroke survivors with upper limb spasticity were randomly divided into a treatment group and a control group, each of 30. Both groups were given routine rehabilitation training while the treatment group was additionally provided with local vibration of the tibial nerve with an amplitude of 0.3mm at 60Hz. Before and after the treatment, the modified Ashworth scale (MAS) and Clonus grading were used to assess muscle tone and spasticity. Electrophysiological functions were evaluated using the tibial nerve motor and sensory conduction test and F wave and H reflex sensing.Results:Before the treatment there were no significant differences between the two groups in their average MAS scores, Clonus grading, maximum H amplitude (Hmax), the ratio of maximum H to maximum M amplitude (H/M) or the intensity of stimulus required to elicit Hmax. After the treatment, however, all of those measurements had improved significantly in both groups with the average improvements in the treatment group significantly greater than those in the control group.Conclusions:Local vibration of the tibial nerve combined with traditional rehabilitation is more effective than traditional rehabilitation alone in relieving triceps surae spasticity and reducing muscle tone after a stroke. The vibration seems to inhibit excitation of the reflex pathway.
3.Operative effect and treatment strategies for the low distal humerus fracture
Jian FAN ; Jiaqing JI ; Xin ZHANG ; Xiuwu GUO ; Ying YAO ; Jiaqian ZHOU ; Shanzhu LI ; Feng YUAN ; Guangrong YU ; Liming CHENG
Chinese Journal of Surgery 2020;58(3):213-219
Objective:To explore the operative effect and treatment strategies for the low distal humerus fracture.Methods:A retrospective analysis was conducted on the clinical data of 16 patients with the low distal humerus fracture between January 2016 and January 2018 at Department of Orthopaedics, Shanghai Tongji Hospital Affiliated to Tongji University.All fractures were coronal fractures of humeral head, partly combined fractures of humeral trochlea or posterior part. Fractures were classified according to Dubberley classification as 9 cases in type Ⅰ, 3 cases in typeⅡ and 4 cases in type Ⅲ.Selection of the kind of operative approach and internal fixation was made according to the fracture type and shape. For simple coronal fractures of humeral head or combining humeral trochlea fractures, which were relatively stable, single or multiple countersunk screws fixation by the lateral approach were chosen.For humeral head coronal fractures, which combining obviously displaced comminuted humeral trochlea factures, posterolateral locking plates and countersunk screws internal fixation by the olecranon osteotomy approach were chosen. The incision and elbow soft tissues were observed within 2 weeks after operation.The radiographic evaluation of fracture reduction, bone healing, internal fixation, arthritis and elbow range of motion were made at 3, 6, 12 months after operation. The Mayo elbow functional scores were documented for analysis of elbow joint function, and compared between different surgery groups by Kruskal-Wallis H test. Results:The follow-up time was (22.1±9.2)months(range: 15 to 39 months). The incisions healed well in 2 weeks after operation without soft tissue infection, necrosis or vascular complications. There was no fracture reduction loss or internal fixation loosening according to radiographic evaluation 3 months after operation. One case of ectopic ossification was observed 6 months after operation and inhibited by the treatment of non steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs.One case of ulnar neuritis occurred after operation and released after removing the long screw and loosing the ulnar.Osteoarthritis images were observed at the end of follow-up.Arc of motion was (120.4±11.2) ° in flexion and (5.5±1.9) ° in extension. The Mayo score was 88.7±9.1, including 11 excellent, 4 good, and 1 fair.The Mayo score was 90.1±3.7 in Dubberley classification type Ⅰcases, 89.7±4.6 in type Ⅱ cases and 84.5±5.8 in type Ⅲ cases. There were no significant differences in Mayo scores between 3 types cases according to Kruskal-Wallis H test. Conclusion:Choosing the appropriate surgical approach and composite internal fixation according to the fracture types and shapes of low distal humerus fracture, anatomic reduction of the articular surface and early functional exercise are the keys to obtain ideal curative effect.
4.Operative effect and treatment strategies for the low distal humerus fracture
Jian FAN ; Jiaqing JI ; Xin ZHANG ; Xiuwu GUO ; Ying YAO ; Jiaqian ZHOU ; Shanzhu LI ; Feng YUAN ; Guangrong YU ; Liming CHENG
Chinese Journal of Surgery 2020;58(3):213-219
Objective:To explore the operative effect and treatment strategies for the low distal humerus fracture.Methods:A retrospective analysis was conducted on the clinical data of 16 patients with the low distal humerus fracture between January 2016 and January 2018 at Department of Orthopaedics, Shanghai Tongji Hospital Affiliated to Tongji University.All fractures were coronal fractures of humeral head, partly combined fractures of humeral trochlea or posterior part. Fractures were classified according to Dubberley classification as 9 cases in type Ⅰ, 3 cases in typeⅡ and 4 cases in type Ⅲ.Selection of the kind of operative approach and internal fixation was made according to the fracture type and shape. For simple coronal fractures of humeral head or combining humeral trochlea fractures, which were relatively stable, single or multiple countersunk screws fixation by the lateral approach were chosen.For humeral head coronal fractures, which combining obviously displaced comminuted humeral trochlea factures, posterolateral locking plates and countersunk screws internal fixation by the olecranon osteotomy approach were chosen. The incision and elbow soft tissues were observed within 2 weeks after operation.The radiographic evaluation of fracture reduction, bone healing, internal fixation, arthritis and elbow range of motion were made at 3, 6, 12 months after operation. The Mayo elbow functional scores were documented for analysis of elbow joint function, and compared between different surgery groups by Kruskal-Wallis H test. Results:The follow-up time was (22.1±9.2)months(range: 15 to 39 months). The incisions healed well in 2 weeks after operation without soft tissue infection, necrosis or vascular complications. There was no fracture reduction loss or internal fixation loosening according to radiographic evaluation 3 months after operation. One case of ectopic ossification was observed 6 months after operation and inhibited by the treatment of non steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs.One case of ulnar neuritis occurred after operation and released after removing the long screw and loosing the ulnar.Osteoarthritis images were observed at the end of follow-up.Arc of motion was (120.4±11.2) ° in flexion and (5.5±1.9) ° in extension. The Mayo score was 88.7±9.1, including 11 excellent, 4 good, and 1 fair.The Mayo score was 90.1±3.7 in Dubberley classification type Ⅰcases, 89.7±4.6 in type Ⅱ cases and 84.5±5.8 in type Ⅲ cases. There were no significant differences in Mayo scores between 3 types cases according to Kruskal-Wallis H test. Conclusion:Choosing the appropriate surgical approach and composite internal fixation according to the fracture types and shapes of low distal humerus fracture, anatomic reduction of the articular surface and early functional exercise are the keys to obtain ideal curative effect.