Objective:To analyze the clinical manifestations and esophageal motility characteristics of patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and extra-esophageal symptoms.Methods:From January 1 to October 30, 2018, at PLA Rocket Force Characteristic Medical Center, 180 hospitalized patients diagnosed with GERD and extra-esophageal symptoms were retrospectively analyzed. The patients were divided into laryngopharyngeal symptom group (65 cases), airway symptom group (58 cases) and mixed symptom group (57 cases). General data, clinical symptoms, gastroscopic manitestations, the results of high-resolution esophageal manometry and 24-hour multichannel intraluminal impedance and pH monitoring of each group were analyzed and compared. Chi-square test and one-way analysis of variance were used for statistical analysis.Results:The patients aged <40, 40 to 60 and >60 years accounted for 12.8% (23/180), 53.3% (96/180) and 33.9% (61/180), respectively, and the difference was statistically significant ( χ2=12.030, P=0.017). There were 18.9%(34/180) of patients without typical reflux symptoms. There were statistically significant differences in the incidence of ectopic esophagogastric mucosa or Barrett esophagus under gastroscopy between laryngopharyngeal symptom group, airway symptom group and mixed symptom group (21.5%, 14/65; 5.2%, 3/58 and 8.8%, 5/57, respectively) ( χ2=8.578, P=0.014). There were no statistically significant differences in the lower esophageal sphincter pressure (LESP), upper esophageal sphincter pressure or distal contractile integral between laryngopharyngeal symptom group, airway symptom group and mixed symptom group ((8.57±0.76), (8.87±0.79), and (10.51±0.97) mmHg (1 mmHg=0.133 kPa); (44.75±2.86), (42.81±4.06), and (39.14±3.20) mmHg; (506.13±64.30), (432.59±78.10), and (682.99±82.28) mmHg·s·cm)(all P>0.05). The DeMeester score of laryngopharyngeal symptom group , mixed symptom group and airway symptom group was (14.33±2.09), (21.94±5.30) and (30.47±5.85) points, respectively, and the difference was statistically significant ( F=3.226, P=0.043). The results of multi-channel impedance monitoring showed that acid reflux and weak acid reflux were the main reflux in the patients, which accounted for 55.5% (76/137) and 34.3% (47/137), respectively. Among 87.6% (120/137) of the patients, reflux mainly occurred in the upright position while 12.4% (17/137) of the patients had reflux in the supine position. Conclusions:The extra-esophageal symptoms of GERD is associated with age. Ectopic esophagogastric mucosa or Barrett esophagus are more common in GERD patients with laryngopharyngeal symptoms. There are more acid exposure and pathologic acid reflux in GERD mainly with airway symptoms. Weak acid reflux at upright position plays an important role in the reflux mechanism of GERD with extra-esophageal symptoms.

Objective To evaluate the effectiveness and complications of laparoscopic repair for hiatal hernia.Methods The clinical data of 992 patients with hiatal hernia undergoing laparoscopic repair from Jan 2008 to June 2014 were collected and analyzed.Postoperative symptom scores,postoperative complications,recurrence rate and satisfaction were evaluated.Results 858 cases were followed up,including type Ⅰ HH accounting for 79.8％,type Ⅱ for 1.3％,type Ⅲ for 17.1％,type Ⅳ for 1.8％ respectively.HH repaired with mesh in 520 cases.The overall improvement rate was 96.2％.Postoperative symptom scores significantly decreased.Recurrence of anatomy and symptoms were 31 and 15 cases respectively.Short-term and long-term of postoperative complications were 35.8％ and 5.6％ respectively.Excellent,fair and poor result were achieved in 91.8％,4.3％,3.9％ of postoperatively follow-up cases,respectively.Conclusion The laparoscopic approach for repair of hiatal hernias is of minimally invasive,lower recurrence rate,less complications and high satisfaction.

Objective To investigate the relationship between obesity and esophageal high resolutionmanometry ,24‐hour pH monitoring and gastroscopic results of patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) .Methods A total of 196 patients with GERD(DeMeester score>14 .72) were selected and divided into normal weight group (18 .5 kg/m2 < BMI < 24 kg/m2 ) , overweight group (24 kg/m2 ≤BMI<28 kg/m2 ) and obese group (BMI≥28 kg/m2 ) according to body mass index (BMI) . Esophageal high resolution manometry ,gastroscopy and 24‐hour pH monitoring were performed with DeMeester score calculated . The classification of esophagitis was according to Los Angeles standard . Normal distributed measurement data were compared by analysis of variance .Non normal distributed measurement data were repesent as M(P25 ,P75) ,and were compared by rank sum test .Chi square test was for count data comparison .Results Compared with normal weight group and overweight group , abdominal length of low esophageal sphincter (LES) of obese group was shorter (1 .90 cm ,0 .85 cm to 2 .45 cm ;2 .85 cm ,2 .23 cm to 3 .20 cm ;2 .50 cm ,1 .98 cm to 3 .0 cm ) , and the differences w ere statistically significant (Z=19 .913 ,P<0 .01) .But there was no significant difference in pressure ,total length of LES and distal esophagus amplitude (all P>0 .05) .The percent total time pH≤4 of obesity group was 15 .42% (10 .31% to 21 .49% ) ,percent supine time pH≤4 was 14 .21% (5 .75% to 34 .98% ) and percent upright time pH≤4 was 14 .25% (8 .19% to 18 .13% ) .The reflux episodes (106 .50 ,67 .00 to 145 .75) and the longest duration of reflux episodes (28 .10 min ,10 .90 min to 47 .93 min) were more than those of normal group (9 .74% ,5 .35% to 15 .96% ;7 .31% ,3 .25% to 11 .80% ;8 .45% ,5 .43% to 17 .48% ;72 .50 ,53 .00 to 100 .50;15 .80 min ,9 .90 min to 21 .28 min) and overweight group (11 .36% , 6 .74% to 15 .87% ;7 .74% ,2 .36% to 15 .05% ;11 .27% ,3 .37% to 14 .73% ;85 .50 ,58 .75 to 117 .75;21 .40 min ,11 .50 min to 39 .90 min) ,and the differences were statistically significant (Z=7 .054 ,11 .181 , 6 .429 ,6 .452 ,8 .246 ,all P<0 .05) .The incidences of hiatus hernia and reflux esophagitis of the obese group (both 56 .67% (17/30)) were both higher than those of normal weight group (36 .46% (35/96) and 30 .21% (29/96)) and overweight group (30 .00% (21/70) and 27 .14% (19/70)) ,and the differences were statistically significant (χ2=6 .439 and 9 .000 ,both P<0 .05) .However ,there was no statistically significant difference among the three groups in the incidence and severe degree of asthma as an extra esophageal appearance (all P>0 .05) .There was no statistically significant difference in the incidence of Barrett′s esophagus among three groups (all P>0 .05) .Conclusions Compared with that of normal weight group and overweight group of patiento with GERD ,abdominal length of LES of obesity group was shorter .With an increase in BMI , acid exposure and the incidences of reflux esophagitis and hiatal hernia also increased .

Objective:To analyze the difference and clinical significance of reflux related parameters between patients with reflux asthma (RA) and typical gastroesophageal reflux disease (TGERD).Methods:From June 2017 to June 2020, at PLA Rocket Force Characteristic Medical Center, the clinical data of 120 patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) who underwent gastroscopy, high-resolution esophageal manometry (HREM) and 24 h pH-impedance monitoring contemporaneously were retrospectively analyzed. The GERD patients were divided into RA group and TGERD group according to the symptom correlated indexes, 60 cases in each group. The reflux related indexes of two groups were compared, which included reflux esophagitis (RE) score, esophageal hiatal hernia, Hill grade score of gastroesophageal flap valve, upper esophageal sphincter (UES) pressure, DeMeester score, and reflux episodes. Mann-Whitney U test and chi-square test were used for statistical analysis. Results:There were no significant differences in RE score and Hill grade score between TGERD group and RA group (0.0, 0.0 to 1.0 vs. 0.0, 0.0 to 1.8; 3.0, 2.0 to 3.0 vs. 3.0, 2.0 to 3.0) (both P>0.05). The detection rate of UES pressure less than 34 mmHg (1 mmHg=0.133 kPa) of RA group was higher than that of TGERD group (41.7%, 25/60 vs. 23.3%, 14/60), and the difference was statistically significant ( χ2=4.596, P=0.032). The UES pressure of RA group was lower than that of TGERD group (51.7 mmHg, 23.6 mmHg to 70.1 mmHg vs. 62.0 mmHg, 37.4 mmHg to 77.4 mmHg), and the difference was statistically significant ( Z=-2.105, P=0.035). There were no significant differences in other parameters of HREM between TGERD group and RA group (all P>0.05). The detection rates of DeMeester score more than 14.7, acid exposure time more than 4.5% and total reflux episodes more than 73 episodes of RA group were all higher than those of TGERD group (41.7%, 25/60 vs. 23.3%, 14/60; 40.0%, 24/60 vs. 21.7%, 13/60; 38.3%, 23/60 vs. 20.0%, 12/60, respectively), and the differences were all statistically significant ( χ2=5.546, 4.728 and 4.881, all P<0.05). The total reflux episodes and weak acid gas reflux episodes of RA group were both higher than those of TGERD group (60 episodes, 43 episodes to 98 episodes vs. 52 episodes, 34 episodes to 69 episodes; 12 episodes, 6 episodes to 21 episodes vs. 9 episodes, 3 episodes to 14 episodes), and the differences were statistically significant ( Z=-2.323 and -2.053, both P<0.05). There were no significant differences in other parameters of 24 h pH-impedance monitoring between TGERD group and RA group (all P>0.05). Conclusion:Low UES pressure, abnormal esophageal acid exposure and increased reflux episodes, especially weak acid gas reflux episodes, may be more likely to induce RA.

Objective:To evaluate the safety and efficacy of domestically produced magnetic sphincter augmentation (MSA) for gastroesophageal reflux disease.Method:This study is a prospective cohort study. Patients with typical heartburn and reflux symptoms (at least partial response to proton pump inhibitors), abnormal esophageal acid exposure and normal esophageal peristalsis were included, prospectively in the Department of Gastroesophageal Surgery, Rocket Force Characteristic Medical Center from June 2019 to September 2022. Patients with hiatal hernia >2 cm and severe esophagitis were excluded. The MSA was wrapped around the distal esophagus after esophageal hiatus repair by laparoscopy. A postoperative questionnaire survey was conducted to assess the relief of symptom, complications, the discontinuation rate of proton pump inhibitor, and surgical satisfaction. Gastroscopy, high-resolution esophageal pressure measurement, and pH value impedance monitoring were also reviewed. The pre- and postoperative rates were compared using the McNeinar χ2 test. Result:Currently, 23 patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease were enrolled and underwent MSA surgery. There were 20 males and 3 females, aged ( M (IQR)) 48 (14) years (range: 25 to 64 years). All cases were successfully implanted with MSA. Subjective indicators were followed for 17 (18) months (range: 14 to 53 months), while objective indicators were followed for 17 (1) months (range: 12 to 23 months). The postoperative gastrointestinal and extraesophageal symptom scores showed a significant decrease compared to preoperative levels as follows: the degree of subjective relief of overall digestive symptoms was 90 (20)% (range:0~100%), the degree of subjective relief of overall respiratory symptoms was 100(10)% (range: 10%~100%), the overall satisfaction rate was 83% (19/23), the proton pump inhibitor discontinuation rate was 70% (16/23). The proportion of esophagitis has decreased from 44% (10/23) to 9% (2/23) ( κ=0.169, P=0.039), The Hill grade of gastroesophageal valve morphology improved from 1 case of grade Ⅰ, 5 cases of grade Ⅱ, 10 cases of grade Ⅲ, and 7 cases of grade Ⅲ preoperative to 22, 1, 0, and 0 cases postoperative. The proportion of lower esophageal sphincter pressure below normal has decreased from 70% (16/23) to 35% (8/23) ( κ=0.170, P=0.012). There were 21 patients who restored normal esophageal acid exposure. Eleven patients had mild long-term dysphagia, but it didn′t affect their daily life. No postoperative device migration, erosion, or secondary surgical removal occurred. Conclusions:Laparoscopic implantation of the MSA device was safe and well tolerated. It can effectively control the symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux disease, reduce medication, restore normal cardia morphology and function, and esophageal acid exposure. The main postoperative complication was dysphagia, but it was relatively mild.

Objective:To evaluate the safety and efficacy of domestically produced magnetic sphincter augmentation (MSA) for gastroesophageal reflux disease.Method:This study is a prospective cohort study. Patients with typical heartburn and reflux symptoms (at least partial response to proton pump inhibitors), abnormal esophageal acid exposure and normal esophageal peristalsis were included, prospectively in the Department of Gastroesophageal Surgery, Rocket Force Characteristic Medical Center from June 2019 to September 2022. Patients with hiatal hernia >2 cm and severe esophagitis were excluded. The MSA was wrapped around the distal esophagus after esophageal hiatus repair by laparoscopy. A postoperative questionnaire survey was conducted to assess the relief of symptom, complications, the discontinuation rate of proton pump inhibitor, and surgical satisfaction. Gastroscopy, high-resolution esophageal pressure measurement, and pH value impedance monitoring were also reviewed. The pre- and postoperative rates were compared using the McNeinar χ2 test. Result:Currently, 23 patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease were enrolled and underwent MSA surgery. There were 20 males and 3 females, aged ( M (IQR)) 48 (14) years (range: 25 to 64 years). All cases were successfully implanted with MSA. Subjective indicators were followed for 17 (18) months (range: 14 to 53 months), while objective indicators were followed for 17 (1) months (range: 12 to 23 months). The postoperative gastrointestinal and extraesophageal symptom scores showed a significant decrease compared to preoperative levels as follows: the degree of subjective relief of overall digestive symptoms was 90 (20)% (range:0~100%), the degree of subjective relief of overall respiratory symptoms was 100(10)% (range: 10%~100%), the overall satisfaction rate was 83% (19/23), the proton pump inhibitor discontinuation rate was 70% (16/23). The proportion of esophagitis has decreased from 44% (10/23) to 9% (2/23) ( κ=0.169, P=0.039), The Hill grade of gastroesophageal valve morphology improved from 1 case of grade Ⅰ, 5 cases of grade Ⅱ, 10 cases of grade Ⅲ, and 7 cases of grade Ⅲ preoperative to 22, 1, 0, and 0 cases postoperative. The proportion of lower esophageal sphincter pressure below normal has decreased from 70% (16/23) to 35% (8/23) ( κ=0.170, P=0.012). There were 21 patients who restored normal esophageal acid exposure. Eleven patients had mild long-term dysphagia, but it didn′t affect their daily life. No postoperative device migration, erosion, or secondary surgical removal occurred. Conclusions:Laparoscopic implantation of the MSA device was safe and well tolerated. It can effectively control the symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux disease, reduce medication, restore normal cardia morphology and function, and esophageal acid exposure. The main postoperative complication was dysphagia, but it was relatively mild.

Objective:To analyze the new value of gastroscopy in the diagnosis of esophageal hiatal hernia(EHH).Methods:From March 7 to September 24 in 2019, 194 patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease who received endoscopy and high resolution esophageal manometry (HREM) at the Department of Gastroesophageal Surgery, the PLA Rocket Force Medical Center were selected. The transverse diameter of esophageal hiatus and the upward length of esophagogastric junction (EGJ) were measured under endoscopy, and the relevant data of reflux esophagitis (RE) and length and pressure of lower esophageal sphincter (LES) were collected. The value of traditional method under endoscopy and esophageal hiatus transverse diameter (EHTD) method under endoscopy in the diagnosis of EHH was compared. Independent sample- t test, rank sum test and chi-square test were used for statistical analysis. Results:The detection rate of EHH by EHTD method under endescopy was higher than that by traditional method under endoscopy and HREM method (60.8%, 118/194 vs. 14.9%, 29/194 and 37.1%, 72/194), and the detection rate of EHH by HREM method was higher than that by traditional method under endoscopy, and the differences were statistically significant ( χ2=86.75, 21.82, and 24.75; all P<0.001). The proportion of RE, the upward length of EGJ and the transverse diameter of esophageal hiatus of EHH patients diagnosed by traditional method under endoscopy and EHTD method under endoscopy were all higher than those of non-EHH patients (79.3%, 23/29 vs. 28.5%, 47/165; 49.2%, 58/118 vs. 15.8%, 12/76; 2.0 (2.0, 3.0) cm vs. 0.4(0, 0.7) cm, 0.7(0, 1.6) cm vs. 0(0, 0.6) cm; (2.60±0.71) cm vs. (1.88±0.44) cm, (2.30±0.45) cm vs. (1.51±0.29) cm); the minimum resting pressure of LES and resting pressure of LES were both lower than those of non-EHH patients(3.7(0.3, 12.1) mmHg (1 mmHg=0.133 kPa) vs. 9.1(3.3, 14.2) mmHg, 6.4(2.2, 12.5) mmHg vs. 10.8 (4.7, 15.5) mmHg; (9.70±7.92) mmHg vs. (14.92±10.30) mmHg, (11.36±7.79) mmHg vs. (18.44±11.78) mmHg); the length of intraperitoneal LES were shorter than that of non-EHH patients (0(0, 1.4) cm vs. 1.1(0, 1.7) cm, 0.3(0, 1.5) cm vs. 1.3(0.4, 1.8) cm); the length of LES of EHH patients diagnosed by EHTD method under endoscopy was shorter than that of non-EHH patients ((2.83±0.63) cm vs. (3.10±0.66) cm), and the differences were statistically significant ( χ2=26.53 and 22.31, Z=-8.26 and-5.04, t=5.26 and 13.67, Z=-2.14 and-2.71, t=-2.59 and-4.63, Z=-2.58 and-3.60, t=-2.96; all P<0.05). There were no significant differences in gender, LES length, intraperitoneal LES length, minimum resting pressure of LES, resting pressure of LES and residual pressure of LES between EHH patients diagnosed by EHTD method and traditional method under endoscopy (all P>0.05). Conclusions:Endoscopy plays a significant role in the diagnosis of EHH. EHTD method under endoscopy is more accurate in the diagnosis of sliding EHH, which is worthy of clinical reference.

Objective:To explore the long-term efficacy of laparoscopic fundoplication for proton pump inhibitor dependent gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD).Method:Clinical data of proton pump inhibitor dependent GERD patients who underwent fundoplication at the Rocket Force Characteristic Medical Center from Jan to Jun 2012 were analyzed, including GERD symptom score, subjective symptom relief rate, PPI discontinuation rate and surgical satisfaction, as well as recurrence and complications.Result:A total of 160 GERD patients were included in this study, with 64% of patients having respiratory symptoms. Nissen and Toupet fundoplication were performed in 43 and 117 cases, respectively, with a follow-up time of (127±3) months. The postoperative GERD symptom scores of the patients were significantly lower than before treatment (all P<0.001); The subjective relief of overall symptoms in the digestive tract and airway problem was 90% (80%, 100%) and 100%, respectively. The PPI discontinuation rate was 86%, and the overall satisfaction rate of the treatment was 92%, and the satisfaction rate of patients with respiratory symptoms was 89%. 7% of patients experienced varying degrees of symptomatic recurrence, 4% of patients re-underwent endoscopic treatment and/or laparoscopic fundoplication due to symptom recurrence. The incidence of long-term postoperative dysphagia, bloating, belching, increased exhaust, abdominal pain, diarrhea, and constipation were 11.3%, 16.9%, 0, 1.3%, 0, 2.5%, and 5.6%, respectively. Conclusions:Laparoscopic fundoplication has good long-term efficacy in the treatment of GERD. A small number of patients may experience postoperative recurrence, as well as complications such as dysphagia and gas-bloat syndrome. Most recurrent patients can achieve good therapeutic effect by redoing endoscopic treatment or redoing surgery.