Objective:To understand the application status of rectal drip therapy, so as to make recommendations for its rational application.Methods:In order to analyze the actual situation of rectal drip therapy and the cognition status of the safety, absorption degree and convenience of rectal drip therapy, a questionnaire survey was conducted from 947 different medical institutions in 22 provinces, 4 direct-controlled municipalities and 4 autonomous regions from July 4 to July 15, 2019.Results:(1) A total of 1 505 valid questionnaires were collected from 947 medical institutions in China, 95 medical institutions indicated that 156 drugs were administered by rectal drip, including 35 drugs in tertiary medical institutions, 50 drugs in secondary medical institutions, 67 drugs in primary medical institutions, and 4 drugs in profit medical institutions.(2) The proportion of oral preparations that was used in rectal drip, and in tertiary and secondary medical institutions were 68.57%(24 cases) and 62.00%(31 cases), respectively, both of which was higher than that proportion in primary medical institutions (13 cases, 19.40%). The proportion of injections in primary medical institutions was 80.60%(54 cases) that was higher than that of tertiary medical institutions (11 cases, 31.43%) and secon-dary medical institutions (19 cases, 38.00%), and the differences were statistically significant (all P<0.001). (3) The proportion of digestive system medication rectal dripping in tertiary medical institutions (13 cases, 37.14%) and secondary medical institutions (20 cases, 38.46%) was higher than that in primary medical institutions (3 cases, 4.41%), and the difference was statistically significant ( P<0.001). The proportion of rectal dripping of Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM) injections in primary medical institutions (47 cases, 69.12%) was higher than that in tertiary medical institutions (1 cases, 2.86%) and secondary medical institutions (0, 0), and the difference was statistically significant ( P<0.001). (4) Among the results of 1 505 questionnaires, 18.61%(280 questionnaire) of doctors thought that rectal drip therapy was safe, 39.34%(592 questionnaire) agreed it was easy to absorb, and 37.34%(562 questionnaire) hold the view that it was convenient.(5) The number of questionnaires in the two groups of used (group A) and not used (group B) was 100 and 1 405, respectively.The cognitive differences in the safety, absorption degree and convenience of rectal drip therapy between the two groups were statistically significant (all P<0.001). Conclusion:There are various drugs used in rectal drip therapy, so it should be strengthened in the management and standardized in pediatrics.

Abstract OBJECTIVE To carry out clinical comprehensive evaluation of prophylactic drugs for clean surgery(type I incision) in children, and to promote the rational use of antibiotics during perioperative period. METHODS According to the Guidelines for the Management of Comprehensive Clinical Evaluation of Drugs(trial edition of 2021), the clinical comprehensive evaluation system of prophylactic drugs for clean surgery(type I incision) was established by using the methods of literature research, brainstorming, expert interview and Delphi, and the evaluation evidence was collected to carry out the comprehensive evaluation of multi-dimensional and multi-level evidence. RESULTS The clinical comprehensive evaluation system was constructed, including 5 first-class indicators(safety, effectiveness, economy, suitability, and accessibility), 11 second-class indicators and 30 third-class indicators. The clinical comprehensive evaluation score of cefazolin was 86.09, and that of cefuroxime was 81.86. The former was better than the latter in safety, effectiveness, economy and suitability, while the latter was better than the former in accessibility. CONCLUSION The clinical comprehensive evaluation of prophylactic drugs for clean surgery(type I incision) in children constructed in this study is scientific, and the results provides a basis for the selection of antibiotics for clean surgery(type I incision) in hospital