Search Results

BACKGROUND:Clinical studies have shown that early use of methylprednisolone can promote neurological functional recovery, reasonable initial dose, interval time and treatment duration are the key to the methylprednisolone treatment of acute spinal cord injury. OBJECTIVE:To observe the differential protein expression profile in spinal cord tissue after intrathecal injection of high-dose methylprednisolone was given in rat model of acute spinal cord injury. METHODS:Eight Sprague-Dawley rats were included in this study to establish acute spinal cord injury model and the models were randomly divided into two groups, receiving intrathecal injection of methylprednisolone 7.5 mg/kg at 0 and 8 hours after modeling. The injured spinal cord tissue was harvested after 24 hours of injection. The differentialy expressed proteins and nerve regeneration-related differential proteins in two groups were analyzed using isotope labeling and quantitative technical analysis. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: Totaly 87 differentialy expressed proteins were identified in this study. Compared with 0 hour group, there were 43 up-regulated differential proteins and 44 down-regulated differential proteins in the 8-hour group. Eighteen differential proteins were related to neural regeneration, including 8 up-regulation proteins and 10 down-regulation proteins. OMgp as a potential neural axon growth inhibitory factor specificaly bound with NgR/P75/TROY/Lingo-1 to form receptor complexes and activated RhoA through the second messenger cAMP, thus inhibiting the colapse of axon growth cone. Folowing intrathecal injection of methylprednisolone for treatment of acute spinal cord injury in rats, differential proteins and nerve regeneration-related factors in spinal cord are identified and analyzed for protein database retrieval and protein function analysis, their expression may serve as the indicator of monitoring nerve regeneration after acute spinal cord injury.

9.Long versus short proximal femoral nail antirotation in treatment of intertrochanteric fractures

Xinghua CHEN ; Tao LIU ; Zhengu HUANG

Chinese Journal of Tissue Engineering Research 2014;(4):595-600

BACKGROUND:There are few clinical control ed trials about the clinical effects in patients with pertrochanteric femur fractures after treatment with short or long proximal femoral nail antirotation.
OBJECTIVE:To compare the clinical outcomes in patients with AO/ASIF-A1/2 pertrochanteric femur fractures after treatment with short or long proximal femoral nail antirotation.
METHODS:A total of 98 patients with AO/ASIF-A1/2 pertrochanteric femur fractures were treated by proximal femoral nail antirotation. They were divided into two groups according to the type of proximal femoral nail antirotation:short nail group (n=50) and long nail group (n=48). The operative time, blood loss, and hospital stay were recorded in both groups. In fol ow-up, fracture healing time, imaging and clinical complications were evaluated. In the final fol ow-up, Harris hip score was used to evaluate functional recovery.
RESULTS AND CONCLUSION:Compared with the short nail group, operative time was shorter and blood loss was less in the long nail group (P<0.05). No significant difference in hospital stay was detected between the short nail and long nail groups (P>0.05). Average fol ow-up periods were respectively (15.8±6.4) months and (16.2±5.7) months in the long nail and short nail groups.“Cutting-out”or infection occurred in five patients in the long nail group and three in the short nail group. Besides above-mentioned patients, the remaining patients in the two groups achieved fracture healing. No significant difference in average fracture healing time was detected between groups (P=0.588). In the final fol ow-up, no significant difference in Harris hip score was detectable in the two groups (P=0.204). The incidence rates of total postoperative complications in the long and short nail groups were 31.2%and 16.0%, respectively (P=0.075). Results suggested that no differences in the union and complication rates between the two groups were identified, suggesting that long nails offer no advantage compared with short nails for stabilizing AO/ASIF-A1/A2 pertrochanteric femur fractures.