Objective To investigate the biological characteristics of papillary thyroid carcinoma(PTC) and to discuss its surgical method.Methods 221 patients of PTC underwent total thyroidectomy and conventional central lymph node dissection from Jul.2009 to Feb.2011 in Department of Thyroid Surgery in the First Hospital of Jilin University.Their clinical data were retrospectively analyzed.Results There was no permanent iatrogenic injury of recurrent laryngeal nerve.Only one patient had permanent hypoparathyroidism.Postoperative pathological results showed that bilateral cancer was found in 69 cases(31.2％).Thyroid membrane invasion was found in 143 cases(64.7％),in which the invasion rate of bilateral cancer was 68.1％ (47/69).Central cervical lymph node metastasis was found in 95 cases(43％),in which central cervical lymph node metastasis rate of bilateral cancer was 46.4％ (32/69),central cervical lymph node metastasis rate of unilateral cancer was 41.5 ％ (63/152),central cervical lymph node metastasis rate of thyroid membrane invasion was 49.7％ (71/143).Thyroid membrane invasion or cervical lymph node metastasis rate in all cases was 75.6％ (167/221).There were 42 cases who were found with suspicious unilateral cancer before surgery but proved to have bilateral PTC by postoperative pathological diagnosis(60.9％).Conclusions Most PTC often occurs bilaterally and the ratio of central cervical lymph node metastasis is very high.We suggest that most patients with PTC should undergo total thyroidectomy,conventional central lymph node dissection,and combine with postoperative Ⅰ131 and hormonal treatment.

Objective To evaluate the safety and efficiency of robot assisted surgery guided by damage control orthopaedics(DCO) in polytraumatised patients with pelvic ring injuries.Methods A retrospective review of the pelvic fracture database was performed.Twenty-six patients who had sustained a pelvic fracture from September 2012 to December 2015 were suitable for robot-assisted minimally invasive internal fixation.They were 17 men and 9 women,aged from 23 to 58 years (average,42.6 years).Their Injury Severity Score(ISS) ranged from 20 to 31 points (average,21.3 years).According to Tile classification,6 cases were type B2,3 type B3,9 type C2 and 8 type C3.Guided by DCO,the vital signs were stabilized by all means and the fractures treated by simple and temporary external fixation before the pelvic and other fractures were managed by the robot-assisted minimally invasive internal fixation.Demographics,times to operating room (TOR),time from acute stabilization to late definitive internal fixation (TAL),time for bone union,type of robot-assisted surgery for major fractures,length of stay (LOS),postoperative complications and mortality were recorded.The outcomes of the pelvis were evaluated at the final follow-up according to the Matta criteria.Results Of the 26 patients,robot-navigated percutaneous screwing was conducted with 23 sacroiliac screws in 19,with 9 ramus pubicus screws in 9,with 6 supraacetabular screws in 4,and with 4 both-column screws in 2 cases.TOR averaged 2.7 times,TAL 5.9 days,LOS at ICU 2.1 days,ICU admission rate 46.2％ (12 of 26),hospital LOS 7.3 days,and time for pelvic bone union 79.0 days.None patients had postoperative complications related to the pelvic fracture and no one died.According to the Matta criteria at the final follow-ups,8 cases were excellent,11 good,5 fair and 2 poor,yielding an excellent and good rate of 73.1％.Conclusion Robot-navigated minimally invasive surgery plus DCO is effective,time saving and safe treatment for polytraumatised patients with pelvic ring injuries.

Objective To investigate the effects of drainage tube placement after fracture internal fixation.Methods A prospective cohort study was conducted of the 235 patients who were to undergo open reduction and internal fixation for tibia fracture,distal radial fracture or ankle joint fracture at Department of Orthopaedic Trauma,Beijing Jishuitan Hospital from March to August,2016.Of them,123 were assigned into an experimental group who were subjected to adequate hemostasis after releasing the tourniquet without drainage following surgery while 112 into a control group who were subjected to conventional hemostasis without relaxing the tourniquet and placement of drainage tubes.The 2 groups were compared in terms of postoperative hospital stay,wound condition,body temperature 3 days postoperatively,counts of hemoglobins,white blood cells and neutrophils,and postoperative visual analogue scale (VAS).Results High fever was not observed in all the patients postoperatively.There were no significant differences between the 2 groups in postoperative hospital stay[(3.3 ± 1.6) d versus (3.7 ± 1.7) d],wound reddening,wound swelling,hemoglobins,white blood cells,neutrophils,or VAS scores postoperatively (P ＞ 0.05).Conclusion Drainage tube placement is not routinely necessary after internal fixation of simple fractures if surgical invasion is limited and hemostasis is adequate after intraoperative release of the tourniquet.

Objective: To investigate expert opinions on the recommendations in Expert Consensus on Optimized Treatments of Ankle Fracture in Light of Enhanced Recovery after Surgery and Expert Consensus on Optimized Treatments of Distal Radius Fracture in Light of Enhanced Recovery after Surgery so as to provide a reference for orthopaedic surgeons when they refer to the 2 documents. Methods: At the symposium in November 2018, all members of Orthopaedic Trauma Committee of Bethune Public Welfare Foundation were interviewed through questionnaires. The questionnaires involved 30 recommendations from the 2 documents concerning optimized perioperative managements. The rates of recommendation and strong recommendation by these experts were calculated about the 30 recommendations from the 2 above documents. Results: A total of 68 experts from the 89 members of Orthopaedic Trauma Committee of Bethune Public Welfare Foundation finished the questionnaires. Of the 30 recommendations, 26 obtained recommendation from these experts at a rate of above 95%, and 4 recommendation from these experts at a rate from 80% to 90%. The rates of strong recommendation were not high, ranging from 60% to 80% in 26 recommendations and <60% in 4. Conclusions The recommendations from the above 2 documents have been highly agreed upon by these experts we investigated but obtained a relatively low rate of strong recommendation. The present investigation may serve as a significant complement for recommendations from the 2 documents of expert consensus and a necessary reference for orthopaedic surgeons.

Objective:To compare the short-term efficacy between femoral neck system (FNS) and cannulated compression screws (CCS) in the treatment of femoral neck fractures in young and middle-aged patients.Methods:A retrospective study was performed of the 29 young and middle-aged patients with femoral neck fracture who had been treated with FNS at Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Beijing Jishuitan Hospital from January 2020 to December 2020. A control group of another 29 patients with femoral neck fracture was selected who had been treated with CCS but matched in gender, age, and body mass index. In the CCS group, there were 14 males and 15 females with an age of (48.2±12.3) years; in the FNS group, there were 14 males and 15 females with an age of (48.2±12.0) years. The fracture reduction quality, operation time, intraoperative blood loss, and femoral neck shortening, hip joint function, Barthel index and health survey 12-item short form (SF-12) score at the last follow-up and complications during follow-up were compared between the 2 groups.Results:No significant difference was found in the preoperative general data or follow-up time between the 2 groups, showing comparability ( P>0.05). The intraoperative blood loss in the CCS group [20 (10, 50) mL] was significantly less than that in the FNS group [50 (20, 50) mL], and the femoral neck shortening at the last follow-up in the CCS group (grade 1 in 5 cases; grade 2 in 18 cases and grade 3 in 6 cases) was significantly worse than that in the FNS group (grade 1 in 21 cases, grade 2 in 6 cases and grade 3 in 2 cases) ( P<0.05). No significant difference was found regarding fracture reduction quality, operation time, complications during follow-up, or Merle D'Aubigne Postel score, Barthel index or SF-12 score at the last follow-up ( P>0.05). Conclusions:In the treatment of femoral neck fractures in young and middle-aged patients, both FNS and CCS are good options for internal fixation. However, FNS can reduce the severity of femoral neck shortening and maintain the length of femoral neck better than CCS.

Objective: To compare the therapeutic effects between the anesthetic and non-anesthetic closed reduction protocols for distal radius fractures based on the concept of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS). Methods: A prospective study was conducted in a cohort of 186 patients with distal radius fracture who had been admitted to the Department of Orthopaedic Trauma, Beijing Jishuitan Hospital from September 2018 to January 2019. The patients were divided into 2 groups depending on the choice by themselves. Of them, 72 (intervention group) underwent the standardized closed reduction under brachial block anesthesia based on the concept of ERAS while the other 114 (control group) conventional closed reduction under no anesthesia. The 2 groups were compared in terms of emergency reduction times, swelling scores, reoperation rate, splint removal time, functional outcomes by the Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation (PRWE) and radiographic outcomes by the Lidström criteria. Results: The patients in both groups were followed up for 6 months. The reduction times were fewer in the intervention group than in the control group (1.1±0.1 versus 1.6±0.1, P<0.05). The reoperation rate was significautly lower in the intervention group than in the control group [2.8%(2/72) versus 12.3%(14/114), P< 0.05]. Reduction deteriorated the swelling condition. Compared with the control group, the swelling was significantly less in the intervention group (2.0±0.1 versus 2.6±0.1, P<0.05). The splint removal time for the intervention group (5.3±0.2 weeks) was significantly shorter than that for the control group (6.9±0.2 weeks) (P<0.05). The intervention group had significantly better PWRE scores than the control group (23.4±1.0 versus 30.3±1.1, P<0.05), but there was no significant difference between groups in the Lidström evaluation (P>0.05). Conclusion Compared with conventional closed reduction, the closed reduction under anesthesia based on the ERAS concept is an effective method for the emergency treatment of distal radius fracture, because it may minimize the patients’ pain experience, increase the rate of successful reduction, decrease the rate of reoperation, shorten the splint fixation time and gain better functional outcomes.

Objective To explore the therapeutic effect of mesorectal excision in gasless transaxillary endoscopic thyroidectomy.Methods Clinical data of 75 patients who underwent gasless unilateral transaxillary endoscopic thyroidectomy from May 2020 to November 2022 were retrospectively analyzed.A total of 40 cases were treated with mesorectal excision(observation group),and 35 cases were treated with thyroid resection followed with central lymph node resection(control group).The operation time,intraoperative blood loss,postoperative hospital stay,number of lymph nodes dissected,and postoperative complications were compared between the two groups.Results All the patients successfully completed the operation.As compared with the control group,the observation group had shorter operation time[(91.8±19.7)min vs.(110.4±19.3)min,t =-4.133,P =0.000]and more lymph nodes dissected[(6.5±2.5)vs.(4.6±2.0),t = 3.610,P = 0.001].There were no statistically significant differences between the two groups in the amount of intraoperative bleeding,recurrent laryngeal nerve injury,and the postoperative hospital stay.There was no hypoparathyroidism,postoperative bleeding,or wound infection in both groups.Conclusion Mesorectal excision is safe and feasible in endoscopic thyroidectomy via axillary approach,with more thorough lymph node dissection in the central region and better protection of recurrent laryngeal nerve.

Objective To explore the learning curve of endoscopic mesothyroid excision via gasless axillary approach.Methods Clinical data of 44 patients who underwent endoscopic mesothyroid excision via gasless axillary approach between May 2020 and December 2022 by the same surgical team were retrospectively analyzed.Taking operation time as index,the learning curve of the operation was studied with the cumulative sum method(CUSUM).The cut-off value of the learning curve was regarded as the dividing line of different stages.The general data,operation time,intraoperative blood loss,hospital stay,number of lymph node dissection,and postoperative complications were compared between the different phases of the learning curve.Results The operations were successfully completed in all the 44 patients without conversion to open surgery.The cumulative sum fitting curve reached the top at the 21st case,which was used as the boundary to divide the learning curve into learning improvement stage and mature stable period.There was no statistically significant difference between the two stages in general data(P>0.05).The operation time in the learning improvement stage was significantly longer than in the mature stable period[(124.5±9.9)min vs.(82.0±8.8)min,t =15.166,P =0.000].The incidence of postoperative sternocleidomastoid muscle swelling and stiffness in patients in the learning improvement stage was higher than that in the mature stable period,but the difference was not statistically significant[6 cases(28.6%)vs.1 case(4.3%),χ2 =3.174,P =0.075].There was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of intraoperative bleeding,hospital stay,number of lymph node dissection,and other postoperative complications(all P>0.05).Conclusion To proficiently master the endoscopic mesothyroid excision via the gasless axillary approach,21 cases need to be completed.

Objective:To compare the long-term clinical outcomes between cannulated screw internal fixation for stable femoral neck fractures and arthroplasty for unstable ones in the elderly patients.Methods:A retrospective study was conducted to analyze the 542 patients with femoral neck fracture who had been admitted to Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Beijing Jishuitan Hospital, Capital Medical University from May 2015 to April 2017. The 542 patients were divided into 2 groups based on fracture stability and treatment method. In the stable group (Garden type Ⅰ, type Ⅱ, and abduction compression type) of 121 cases who underwent cannulated screw internal fixation, there were 28 males and 93 females with a mean age of (77.6±8.1) years, and 20 cases of type Ⅰ, 101 cases of type Ⅱ, and 34 cases of abduction compression type by the Garden classification. In the unstable group (Garden type Ⅲ, type Ⅳ, and type Ⅱ with a posterior tilt angle >20°) of 421 cases who underwent arthroplasty, there were 130 males and 291 females with a mean age of (78.7 ± 6.9) years, and 14 cases of type Ⅱ, 403 cases of type Ⅲ, and 4 cases of type Ⅳ by the Garden classification. The postoperative mortality, reoperation rate, and mobility at the last follow-up were compared between the 2 groups.Results:There were no statistically significant differences in the baseline characteristics, except for serum albumin concentration and peripheral white blood cell count at admission, between the 2 groups, indicating comparability ( P>0.05). The hospital stay in the stable group [5.0 (4.0, 6.0)d] was significantly shorter than that in the unstable group [6.0 (5.0, 8.0)d], and the follow-up time for the stable group [54.4 (49.3, 58.7) months] significantly longer than that for the unstable group [52.2 (46.0, 59.3) months] ( P<0.05). A total of 158 patients (45 cases in the stable group and 113 cases in the unstable group) were lost to the last follow-up. At the last follow-up, the mortality in the stable group (18.4%, 14/76) was significantly lower than that in the unstable group (31.5%, 97/308), the reoperation rate in the former (15.8%, 12/76) significantly higher than that in the latter (3.6%, 11/308), and the capability of daily activities in the former (by the fracture mobility scoring: level 1 in 35 cases, level 2 in 13 cases, level 3 in 3 cases, level 4 in 2 cases, and level 5 in 1 case) significantly better than that in the latter (level 1 in 99 cases, level 2 in 47 cases, level 3 in 24 cases, level 4 in 22 cases, and level 5 in 5 cases) (all P<0.05). Conclusion:Compared with the arthroplasty for unstable femoral neck fractures, cannulated screw internal fixation for stable femoral neck fractures leads to a lower long-term mortality and a better capability of daily activities, but a significantly higher reoperation rate.

Objective:To evaluate the effect of the impaction of posterior wall on the prognosis following open reduction and internal fixation for fractures of acetabular posterior wall.Methods:A retrospective study was conducted to analyze the data from the 83 patients with fracture of acetabular posterior wall who had been consecutively treated by open reduction and internal fixation at Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Beijing Jishuitan Hospital from January 2017 to December 2020. The patients were divided into 2 groups based on involvement of posterior wall impaction. In the impaction group of 33 cases, there were 26 males and 7 females with an age of (47.4±11.6) years; in the non-impaction group of 50 cases, there were 43 males and 7 females with an age of (41.3±12.0) years. The quality of postoperative fracture reduction, the function of the affected hip at the last follow-up, and the complication rate during follow-up were compared between the 2 groups. Multifactorial binary logistic regression and age subgroups were used to analyze the effects of posterior wall impaction on functional outcomes.Results:The age, rate of associated injuries in other body parts, and rate of posterior wall comminution in the impaction group were significantly higher than those in the non-impaction group ( P<0.05), but there was no statistically significant difference in other general data of patients between the 2 groups ( P>0.05). All patients were followed up for (44.5±13.3) months after surgery. The rate of anatomical reduction in the non-impaction group (96.0%, 48/50) was significantly higher than that in the impaction group (57.6%, 19/33) ( P<0.05), and the good and excellent rate by the modified Merle d'Aubigné & Postel scale at the last follow-up in the non-impaction group (84.0%, 42/50) was significantly higher than that in the impaction group (51.5%, 17/33) ( P<0.05). There was no significant difference in the incidence of complications between the 2 groups ( P>0.05). After adjusting for age and gender, the difference in hip function was still significantly different between the 2 groups ( OR=0.23, 95% CI: 0.06 to 0.79, P=0.020). The effect of posterior wall impaction on functional outcomes was statistically significant in patients aged ≥50 years ( P=0.008), whereas the difference was not statistically significant in patients aged <50 years ( P=0.194). Conclusions:Compared with non-impaction ones, acetabular fractures of posterior wall impaction tend to lead to poorer quality of reduction, which in turn affects the postoperative recovery of hip joint function. The impact of impaction fractures on functional recovery is more significant in patients aged 50 years and above.