1.Establishment and Application of the Method of Polymorphism of Aldehyde Dehydrogenase 2 Gene Based on PCR-gold Magnetic Nanoparticle Chromatography
Xiaoyue Lü ; Yuquan LIU ; Wenli HUI
Journal of Modern Laboratory Medicine 2017;32(4):21-24
Objective To estabolish the ALDH2 Glu504Lys genotyping technique for oral swab sample type based on PCR-gold magnetic nanoparticle chromatographyl.Methods According to the ALDH2 Glu504Lys gene the specific primers were designed by ARMS-PCR technique.Optimized the optimal ALDH2 Glu504Lys oral swab reaction system and PCR reaction procedures based on the routine reaction conditions and reaction procedure of laboratory PCR.60 samples of oral swabs were collected and tested by gold magnetic nano-chromatography.The results were verified by sequencing.Results The detected 60 cases of oral swab samples contain 16 cases heterozygous mutation,wild type 42 cases,homozygous mutation 2 cases and then the results by Goldmag nanoparticle detection was perfectly matched with sequencing results.Conclusion The Goldmag nanoparticles chromatographic detection technique of ALDH2 Glu504Lys buccal swabs system was established.With accuracy,fastness,reliability,it is worthy of clinical promotion.
2.Clinicopathological significance of X-ray repair cross complementing gene 1 expression in colorectal carcinoma
Lu FENG ; Bo HU ; Mei LI ; Zhaohui WANG ; Xiaoyue PEI ; Shen Lü
Cancer Research and Clinic 2010;22(9):604-606
Objective To explore the clinicopathological value of X-ray repair cross complementing gene 1(XRCC1) expression in colorectal carcinoma. Methods The XRCC1 gene expression in 107 cases of colorectal carcinomas, 25 cases of adjacent mucosa and 36 cases of normal colorectal mucosa was detected immunohistochemically, and the correlation between the expression and clinicopathological factors was analyzed. Results The positive rates of XRCC1 expression in colorectal carcinoma and adjacent mucosa,87.8 % (94/107) and 84.0 % (21/25) respectively, were significantly higher than that in the normal colorectal mucosa [27.8 %(10/36) (P=0.000, P =0.000)]. In colorectal carcinoma, the positive rate of XRCC1 expression in the group of poor differentiation [44.4 % (4/9)] was significantly lower than that in the groups of moderate and well differentiation [94.8 % (50/58)(P=0.000) and 87.5 %(35/40) (P=0.015)], while the positive rate of XRCC1 expression was not related to sex, age, location, infiltration depth and lymph node metastasis (P >0.05). Conclusion The results indicated that XRCC 1 protein can be used as a marker to diagnose colorectal carcinoma.