Point-of-care testing (POCT) is a test method performed on the sampling site or patient bedside. Accurate results can be achieved rapidly by the application of portable analytical instruments and compatible reagents. It has been widely used in the field of in vitro diagnosis (IVD). Paper-based microfluidics technology has great potential in developing POCT due to its advantages in low cost, simple operation, rapid detection, portable equipment, and unrestricted application conditions. In recent years, the development of paper-based microfluidic technology and its integration with various new technologies and methods have promoted the substantial development of POCT technology and methods. The classification and characteristic of the paper are summarized in this review. Paper-based microfluidic sample pretreatment methods, the flow control in the process of reaction and the signal detecting and analyzing methods for the testing results are introduced. The research progress of various kinds of microfluidic paper-based analytical devices (μPADs) toward POCT in recent years is reviewed. Finally, remaining problems and the future prospects in POCT application of paper-based microfluidics are discussed.
Diagnostic Tests, Routine ; methods ; Humans ; Microfluidic Analytical Techniques ; instrumentation ; Paper ; Point-of-Care Testing

Objective:To explore the clinical value of cluster management in secondary hydrocephalus.Methods:Seventy-seven patients with secondary hydrocephalus admitted to Department of Neurosurgery, Shenzhen Second People's Hospital from January 2016 to June 2021 were chosen; they were divided into traditional management group ( n=30) and cluster management group ( n=47) according to different management methods. Patients in traditional management group accepted craniocerebral CT and 3 consecutive times of cerebrospinal fluid tests, and normal results were achieved and then ventriculoperitoneal shunt (VPS) was performed. In patients from the cluster management group, on the basis of management treatment, cranial plain and enhanced MRI and DNA metagenomic next generation sequencing of cerebrospinal fluid were performed before surgery, and rapid test of cerebrospinal fluid and ventriculoscope observation were performed during surgery; after exclusion of intracranial infection, VPS was performed. The differences of shunt failure rate were compared between the two groups and the positive rates of intracranial infection detected by above 4 methods were compared in the cluster management group. Results:There was significant difference in shunt failure rate between the cluster management group and traditional management group (2.1% vs. 20.0%, P<0.05). The positive rates of intracranial infection by DNA metagenomics (61.7%) and ventriculoscopy (68.1%) were significantly higher than those by preoperative cranial plain and enhanced MRI (14.9%) and rapid test of cerebrospinal fluid (6.4%, P<0.05). Conclusion:Cluster management can effectively decrease the VPS failure rate in secondary hydrocephalus; DNA metagenomics and ventriculoscopy have high efficiency in detecting intracranial infection.

Objective To compare the short-term clinical efficacies of Da Vinci robotic surgical systemassisted and laparoscopy-assisted radical gastrectomy for locally advanced gastric cancer (GC).Methods The retrospective cohort study was conducted.The clinicopathological data of 162 patients who underwent minimally invasive radical gastrectomy for locally advanced GC in the First Affiliated Hospital of Army Medical University between September 2016 and September 2017 were collected.Of 162 patients,65 undergoing Da Vinci robotic surgical system-assisted radical gastrectomy were allocated into the robotic group and 97 undergoing laparoscopyassisted radical gastrectomy were allocated into the laparoscopic group.According to Japanese gastric cancer treatment guidelines,patients with upper GC and with middle or lower GC underwent respectively total gastrectomy + D2 lymph node dissection and distal subtotal gastrectomy + D2 lymph node dissection,and then Billroth Ⅱ or Roux-en-Y digestive tract reconstruction.Observation indicators:(1) surgical and postoperative situations;(2) detection of lymph node;(3) follow-up and survival situations.Measurement data with normal distribution were represented as x±s,and comparisons between groups were analyzed using the t test.Comparisons of count data were done using the chi-square test.Ordinal data were analyzed by the nonparametric test.Results (1) Surgical and postoperative situations:all 162 patients underwent successful surgery,without conversion to laparoscopic or open surgery,and pathological resection margins were confirmed as R0.Volume of intraoperative blood loss,levels of amylase in peritoneal drainage fluid at day 1,2 and 3 postoperatively,levels of serum amylase fluid at day 1,2 and 3 postoperatively were respectively (123±39) mL,(557± 181) U/L,(357± 127) U/L,(183±86) U/L,(181±47)U/L,(123±29)U/L,(85±22)U/L in the robotic group and (142±40)mL,(793±284)U/L,(497±199)U/L,(279±157) U/L,(218±45) U/L,(162±37) U/L,(120±31) U/L in the laparoscopic group,with statistically significant differences between groups (t =-3.015,-2.817,-2.364,-2.132,-2.372,-3.338,-3.720,P＜0.05).Cases with distal subtotal gastrectomy + D2 lymph node dissection and with total gastrectomy + D2 lymph node dissection,cases with Billroth Ⅱ and Roux-en-Y of digestive tract reconstruction,time of distal subtotal gastrectomy + D2 lymph node dissection,time of total gastrectomy + D2 lymph node dissection,cases with anastomotic leakage,pulmonary infection,wound infection or liquefaction and delayed gastric emptying,cases in grading Ⅱ,Ⅲ,Ⅳ and Ⅴ of postoperative complications,time of postoperative drainage-tube removal and duration of postoperative hospital stay were respectively 47,18,40,25,(222±37) minutes,(274±43) minutes,1,1,1,1,2,1,0,0,(6.5-± 1.5) days,(10.0±4.0) days in the robotic group and 74,23,69,28,(213±40) minutes,(262±39)minutes,2,4,1,0,4,1,0,1,(6.9±1.7)days,(10.0±5.0)days in the laparoscopic group,with no statistically significant difference between groups (x2=0.326,1.628,t =1.272,0.960,x2=2.501,Z=-1.342,t=-1.142,-0.115,P＞0.05).One and 1 patients in the robotic and laparoscopic groups who were complicated with esophagus-jejunum anastomotic leakage after total gastrectomy + Roux-en-Y anastomosis were cured by nutrition support therapy using feeding tube placement under gastroscopy,and 1 patient in the laparoscopic group who were complicated with gastrojejunal anastomosis leakage after distal subtotal gastrectomy +Billroth Ⅱ anastomosis received the second surgical exploration and jejunal feeding tube placement.Patients with pulmonary infection,wound infection or liquefaction and delayed gastric emptying were cured by conservative treatment.Levels of amylase in peritoneal drainage fluid and serum amylase fluid at day 1,2 and 3 postoperatively were not higher than 3 times of upper limit of normal,without treatment interventions.(2) Detection of lymph node:overall number of lymph nodes detected in the robotic and laparoscopic groups were respectively 36.82±13.41 and 35.21 ± 11.52,with no statistically significant difference between groups (t =0.786,P＞ 0.05).Results of further analysis showed that numbers of lymph node dissected in the 2nd station and upper region of pancreas in patients undergoing distal subtotal gastrectomy + D2 lymph node dissection were respectively 6.04±3.98,13.51±6.53 in the robotic group and 4.45±3.12,11.40±5.30 in the laparoscopic group,with statistically significant differences between groups (t=2.461,1.986,P＜0.05).Numbers of lymph node dissected in No 7 and 8 groups and upper region of pancreas in patients undergoing total gastrectomy + D2 lymph node dissection were respectively 5.44±2.63,2.92±1.87,10.81±4.78 in the robotic group and 3.11±1.82,1.62±1.33,7.76±3.34 in the laparoscopic group,with statistically significant differences between groups (t =3.340,2.689,2.522,P＜0.05).(3) Follow-up and survival situations:of 162 patients,148 were followed up for 2-14 months,with a median time of 8 months.During the follow-up,patients in the 2 groups had tumor-free survival.Conclusions Da Vinci robotic surgical system-assisted radical gastrectomy is safe and feasible.Compared with laparoscopy-assisted radical gastrectomy for locally advanced GC,it has advantages of clear vision of the local anatomy,less intraoperative bleeding,more numbers of lymph nodes dissected in the upper region of pancreas and lighter pancreatic injure,meanwhile,it has also certain operating advantages around the great vessels and in the deep and narrow spaces.