Objective:This study aimed to compare postoperative pain between minimally invasive coronary artery bypass grafting (MICS-CABG) and conventional CABG for multivessel coronary artery disease, comparing baseline characteristics and perioperative data between the two groups, and analyzing risk factors influencing postoperative pain.Methods:A total of 545 patients undergoing elective off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (OPCABG) for multivessel coronary artery disease at Beijing Anzhen Hospital from July 2022 to July 2023 were included. There were 397 patients in the conventional CABG group (289 males, 108 females, aged 35-77 years) and 148 patients in the minimally invasive CABG group (121 males, 27 females, aged 37-84 years), with 148 patients in each group after propensity score matching. Pain levels were assessed using the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) at the first 5 days postoperatively (acute postoperative pain, APP) and at 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively (chronic post-surgical pain, CPSP). Logistic regression was used to analyze risk factors for CPSP at 3 months postoperatively in both groups. Results:Within 48 hours postoperatively, both groups reported maximum NRS pain intensities at rest (NRS 4.0 vs. 6.0) and during activity (NRS 5.2 vs. 7.5). From the third day after surgery, there were no significant differences in resting pain intensity between the two groups, and from the fourth day after surgery, there were no significant differences in pain intensity during movement. With 60.2% in the conventional group and 92.6% in the minimally invasive group experiencing moderate to severe pain at rest (NRS ≥ 4), and 83.5% in the conventional group and 98.0% in the minimally invasive group experiencing moderate to severe pain during activity (NRS ≥ 4). Immediately after drain removal, there was a significant reduction in pain intensity at rest in the minimally invasive group (pre-drain removal NRS 6.0 vs. post-drain removal NRS 2.7), compared to the conventional group (pre-drain removal NRS 4.0 vs. post-drain removal NRS 2.3). However, there was no significant difference in the reduction of pain intensity during activity between the minimally invasive group (pre-drain removal NRS 7.5 vs. post-drain removal NRS 4.2) and the conventional group (pre-drain removal NRS 6.0 vs. post-drain removal NRS 2.7). At 3 months postoperatively, the incidence of CPSP was 35.9% in the conventional group and 35.1% in the minimally invasive group. At 6 months postoperatively, the incidence of CPSP was significantly lower compared to 3 months in both groups (conventional group 8.7% vs. minimally invasive group 6.8%, P<0.001). In the conventional group, higher Europe SCORE Ⅱ was identified as an independent risk factor for CPSP at 3 months postoperatively, while in the minimally invasive group, higher BMI and postoperative use of flurbiprofen for rescue analgesia were identified as independent risk factors. Conclusion:In patients undergoing minimally invasive coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), the early postoperative acute pain intensity and incidence were higher than those in the conventional CABG group. After drain removal, there were no significant differences in resting pain intensity between the two groups, but pain intensity during movement remained higher in the minimally invasive group compared to the conventional group. The incidence of chronic pain did not differ between the two groups but decreased significantly from 3 months postoperatively. Conventional CABG patients with high preoperative Europe SCORE Ⅱ scores, high preoperative BMI and severe postoperative acute pain tend to have more chronic pain after minimally invasive bypass surgery.

Clamshell incision is widely used in the surgical resection of complex mediastinal tumors, but it is also controversial. Its advantages are the full exposure of the field of vision and the huge operating space, while its disadvantages are the destruction of chest wall muscles and respiratory function impairment. At present, there is a lack of norms for the selection and application of Clamshell incisions, and the definition of complex mediastinal tumors is ambiguous and the dimensions are single. Therefore, this article reviews the literature and combines practical experience to systematically summarize the application progress of Clamshell incisions in the surgical resection of complex mediastinal tumors, with the aim of providing guidance for clinical work.

To investigate the role of the DPP4-nestin axis in liver fibrosis induced by alveolar cyst infection,a murine model was established using C57BL/6 mice via hepatic portal vein injection.Liver histopathological changes were assessed using HE staining,while immunohistochemistry and immunofluorescence were employed to evaluate the expression levels of nestin and DPP4 in infected mouse livers.In vitro,J S1 cell line was stimulated with recombinant DPP4 protein to es-tablish a cellular model,and qPCR,Western blot,and shRNA lentivirus interference techniques were utilized to examine the involvement of the DPP4-nestin axis in hepatic stellate cell activation.The findings demonstrated that compared to the Sham group,liver tissue structure disruption and collagen deposition were evident along with significantly increased expressions of nestin and DPP4(P＜0.050 0),which colocalized with nesin and α-SMA.Furthermore,stimulation with recombi-nant DPP4 protein significantly enhanced JS1 cell activation(P＜0.050 0)as well as upregulated nestin expression(P＜0.050 0)when compared to control group cells.Notably,shRNA lentivirus-mediated inhibition of nestin expression effectively suppressed the activating effects exerted by re-combinant DPP4 protein on JS1 cells(P＜0.050 0).Collectively,these results highlight the crucial regulatory role played by the DPP4-nestin axis in hepatic stellate cell activation triggered by alveo-lar infection;thus,targeting this axis may represent a novel therapeutic strategy for treating alveo-lar infection-induced liver fibrosis.

Objective To compare the safety and efficacy of minimally invasive coronary artery bypass grafting (MICS CABG) and traditional CABG in patients with coronary heart disease (CHD) and diabetes mellitus (DM). Methods From 2019 to 2021, the patients who received CABG by the same medical group in the Minimally Invasive Cardiac Surgery Center of Beijing Anzhen Hospital were retrospectively enrolled. According to the surgery methods, the patients were divided into two groups: a MICS CABG group and a conventional group. The perioperative and postoperative follow-up data of patients were collected. The main observation results included all cause death events, myocardial infarction, cerebrovascular, revascularization, and adverse wound healing. Results According to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, 140 patients were enrolled, including 66 patients in the MICS CABG group [56 males and 10 females, aged (61.83±8.94) years], and 74 patients in the conventional group [55 males and 19 females, aged (58.61±8.26) years]. Compared with the conventional group, patients in the MICS CABG group had longer median surgical time (4.50 h vs. 4.00 h, P=0.005), less intraoperative bleeding (600.00 mL vs. 700.00 mL, P=0.020), and a lower rate of secondary debridement and suturing of surgical wounds (4.5% vs. 16.2%, P=0.023). The median follow-up time was 2.54 years. There was no statistically significant difference in the cumulative incidence of major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (7.6% vs. 5.4%), all-cause mortality (0.0% vs. 0.0%), myocardial infarction (3.0% vs. 2.7%), cerebrovascular events (4.5% vs. 2.7%), or revascularization (0.0% vs. 0.0%) between the two groups of patients during the postoperative follow-up (P>0.05). Conclusion MICS CABG can achieve the same revascularization effect as traditional CABG in patients with CHD and DM. MICS CABG can effectively reduce adverse clinical outcomes or complications such as adverse chest wound healing and slow postoperative recovery of body function in patients with DM.

Objective To compare the biomechanical characteristics of novel retrograde intramedullary nail,common femoral retrograde intramedullary nail,and medial femoral condyle locking plate for treating distal femur type A fractures by finite element analysis,and study the advantages of retrograde intramedullary nail on medial femoral condyle.Methods A novel retrograde intramedullary nail on medial femur condyle was designed.CT scan was performed on lower limb bones of a male volunteer,and a three-dimensional(3D)model of the femur was established.The model was then segmented to create models of distal femur type A2 and A3 fractures.The 3D models of internal fixator were established.The small and standard retrograde intramedullary nail on medial femoral condyle,common femoral retrograde intramedullary nail,locking plate on medial femoral condyle were used for internal fixation on A2 type fracture.A3 type fracture was fixed with one of the above internal fixators combined with lateral condylar plate respectively.The 600 N axial load and 4 N·m torsional load were applied to the models.The displacement and stress of femurs,the displacement and stress of internal fixators,the micro-momentum between the internal fixator and the bone,the relative displacement of the two fracture broken ends were observed in each group.Results Among the A2 and A3 type fractures under axial loads,the correponding standard group and corresponding standard combined group had the smallest peak displacement and peak stress of internal fixation.Among the A2 and A3 type fractures under torsional loads,the correponding standard group and corresponding standard combined group had the smallest peak displacement of the femur and internal fixation.The relative displacement of the two broken ends in the standard combined group was the smallest.Conclusions Compared with femoral medial condylar locking plate and common retrograde intramedullary nail,this novel retrograde intramedullary nail on medial femur condyle has a mechanical advantage of reducing stress concentration and reducing the risk of internal fixation failure,and it can be used alone for distal femur type A2 fracture,or in combination with the lateral condylar plate to fix distal femur type A3 fracture.

Objective To analyze the relationship between clinical drug utilization and the risk of nosocomial infections among hospitalized patients,and provide evidence for the prevention and control of nosocomial infections.Methods This study adopted a retrospective case-control design.The case group included 209 patients with nosocomial infection reported from January 2023 to December 2023 in a tertiary hospital.The control group included 209 patients without nosocomial infection during the same period.The patients in the control group were selected by stratified sampling based on Charlson Comorbidity Index(CCI).Results Univariate analysis showed that proton pump inhibitors,antacids,immunosuppressants and prior antimicrobial combination therapy increased the risk of nosocomial infection(P＜0.05).Multivariate log-binomial regression analysis showed that proton pump inhibitors,immunosuppressive drugs,and prior antimicrobial combination therapy were correlated with nosocomial infection.The corresponding relative risk(RR)was 1.31(95％CI:1.07-1.60),1.40(95％CI:1.02-1.91),and 1.66(95％CI:1.01-2.74),respectively.Further analysis indicated that the patients with nosocomial infection had longer time in use of proton pump inhibitors and prior antimicrobial combination therapy than the patients in the control group(Z=-6.331,P＜0.001;Z=-2.667,P=0.008).The trend Chi-square test showed that there was a dose-response relationship for proton pump inhibitors(x2=73.869,P＜0.001),immunosuppressive drugs(x2=16.530,P＜0.001),and prior antimicrobial combination therapy(x2=35.107,P＜0.001).Conclusions The use of immunosuppressants,proton pump inhibitors and antimicrobial combination therapy increases the risk of nosocomial infections in hospitalized patients.The prolonged use of these drugs will further increase the risk of nosocomial infection.

Objective:To compare the efficacy of Ilizarov ring external fixation and unilateral rail external fixation in the treatment of infected bone defects following surgery for tibial fractures.Methods:A retrospective cohort study was conducted to analyze the clinical data of 50 patients with infected bone defects after surgery for tibial fractures, who were admitted to the 940th Hospital of the Joint Logistics Support Force of the PLA from August 2019 to November 2021, including 37 males and 13 females, aged 19-59 years [(42.2±8.8)years]. After debridement and osteotomy, 28 patients were treated with Ilizarov ring external fixation (Ilizarov group) and 22 with unilateral rail external fixation (unilateral fixation group). All the patients in the two groups had previously undergone internal fixation with plates or Kirschner wires for tibial fracture before bone transport. Bone transport started at one week for three stages after successful infection control and osteotomy and was conducted. The following parameters were compared between the two groups: frame-wearing time and healing index after bone transport, self-rating anxiety scale (SAS) grade at 6 months after bone transport, Paley score and Association for the Study and Application of the Method of Ilizarov (ASAMI) score at the last follow-up, Hospital for Special Surgery (HSS) knee score and Baird-Jackson ankle score on admission, after external fixator removal and at the last follow-up, and incidence of postoperative complications.Results:All the patients were followed up for 28-36 months [(32.5±1.6)months]. There were no significant differences in frame-wearing time or healing index between the two groups after bone transport ( P>0.05). At 6 months after bone transport, the SAS grade in the unilateral fixation group (13 patients with mild anxiety, 8 with moderate anxiety, and 1 with severe anxiety) was better than that in the Ilizarov group (6 patients with mild anxiety, 19 with moderate anxiety, 3 with severe anxiety) ( P<0.01). No significant differences were found in the Paley score or ASAMI score between the two groups at the last follow-up ( P>0.05). There were no significant differences in HSS knee score or Baird-Jackson ankle score between the two groups on admission, after external fixator removal or at the last follow-up ( P>0.05). No significant differences were observed in the incidence of pin tract infection, poor healing, infection in the bone elongation area, or re-fracture between the two groups ( P>0.05). The incidence of postoperative axial deviation was 0 in the Ilizarov group, lower than 18% in the unilateral fixation group (4/22) ( P<0.05). Conclusion:Although Ilizarov ring external fixation and unilateral rail external fixation demonstrate comparable efficacy in the treatment of infected bone defects after surgery for tibial fractures, the former provides superior mechanical stability and postoperative axial deviation correction, while the latter offers advantages in reducing psychological burden and enhancing treatment tolerance.