1.Safety and Risk Control Study of Inhalation Preparation Based on CiteSpace
Zhengran WEI ; Yanqiong JIANG ; Tianzi SHI ; Yuanxuan CAI ; Yuhang ZHAO ; Xiaofang SHANGGUAN ; Rui HUANG ; Ke LI
Herald of Medicine 2024;43(6):993-999
Objective To analyze the hot spots,rules and distribution on safety research of inhalation preparations at home and abroad in the past 20 years,and to summarize the current status of safety and risk control research on inhalation preparations.Methods This reaserch is based on the literature related to the safety and risk control of inhalation preparations in the core collection database of the Web of Science.With the help of Excel 2021 and CiteSpace6.1.R3,visualized processing and analysis were carried out on the annual number of publications,countries,institutions,authors,co-occurrence of keywords,clustering and prominence.Results A total of 365 articles were included,the annual publication number in the field of the safety and risk control of inhalation preparations was less than 30 per year from 2002 to 2018.But since 2019,the number of articles published this year has exceeded 30.Through the analysis of the cooperation network of countries and institutions,the top four countries in terms of publication volume are the United States,the United Kingdom,Germany,and China,and the top three institutions are AstraZeneca,GlaxoSmithKline and Pfizer.Through the analysis of the author cooperation network,the cooperation network between European and American authors was formed earlier,and a certain research group has appeared in 2002.In contrast,a more concentrated cooperation network has been formed in China in 2020.Conclusions In the past 20 years,the research on inhalation preparations has mainly focused on their safety and efficacy,while there are few studies on their risk control.There is a disconnect between safety assessment and risk assessment,and the future focus maybe focused on the adverse reaction assessment and risk management research of inhalation preparations.
2.CiteSpace bibliometric analysis of safety and risk studies of antibody drugs in China
Yue PENG ; Lingling LIU ; Yuanxuan CAI ; Yuhang ZHAO ; Xiaofang SHANGGUAN ; Kangling LI ; Zherui CHEN ; Ke LI ; Rui HUANG ; Yuanyuan LU
China Pharmacist 2024;27(6):1019-1027
Objective To analyze the domestic antibody drug safety and risk research status,the latest research hotspots and frontiers in the current ten years.Methods CiteSpace 6.2.R2 software was used to analyze all literature related to the safety and risk of antibody drugs in CNKI,WanFang data and Vip database from 2012 to 2022.Results A total of 2 773 pieces of literature were obtained from the three databases,which were imported into CiteSpace after deduplication,and finally,1 870 pieces were included in the analysis.In the past decade,the number of articles published in the field of antibody drugs safety and risk research has remained at about 100 articles per year from 2012 to 2019,since 2020,the number of articles published has started to increase,and the annual number of articles published has increased to around 300 articles from 2021 to 2022.The network graph of domestic institutional cooperation showed that there was a lack of cooperation among the research institutions of antibody drug safety and risk research,mainly due to the fact that hospitals were conducting research in this field,and the types of research subjects were relatively single.The author collaboration network graph showed that the core teams in this research field,such as Li Bo,Yang Yanwei,and Lin Zhi,had the closest collaboration,while there was less collaboration among high-yield authors,additionally,some experts and scholars conducted research on their own as individuals or small groups,the research focused on adverse reactions,safety,bevacizumab,Rituximab,Meta-analysis,etc.Conclusion In the past decade,domestic research has mainly focused on the clinical efficacy and safety of antibody drugs,with few scholars exploring the risk of antibody drugs,therefore,in the future,it is necessary to pay attention to the research on the risks of antibody drugs.