1.Loewenstein occupational therapy cognitive assessment and mini-mental state examination in evaluating the cognitive function of patients received cardiac surgery:a comparative study
Chinese Journal of Neuromedicine 2011;10(10):1063-1066
Objective To evaluate whether Loewenstein occupational therapy cognitive assessment (LOTCA) can be used in the diagnosis of postoperative cognitive dysfunction (POCD) by comparing it with mini-mental state examination (MMSE).Methods Thirty patients performed cardiac valve replacement surgery in our hospital from October 2010 to March 2011 were chosen; the cognitive function of these patients were neuropsychologically evaluated by MMSE and LOTCA 1 d before and 7 d after the surgery; the differences of accurately diagnostic rate on POCD,the scores and the time-consuming when MMSE and LOTCA were chosen were compared.Results Thirteen patients (43.33%) were diagnosed as having POCD by MMSE and 17 patients (56.67%) by LOTCA; the difference of accurately diagnostic rate on POCD was not statistically significant (x2=1.067,P=0.302).MMSE scores,LOTCA scores and scores of 4 subtests (motor praxis,visuomotor organization,operation of thinking,and attention and concentration) 7 d after the surgery was significantly decreased as compared with those 1 d before the surgery (P<0.05).MMSE scores were highly correlated with LOTCA scores (γ=0.711,P=0.005).Conclusion LOTCA can be used in the diagnosis and research of POCD.It can do a more comprehensive assessment than MMSE in cognitive function with longer times.
3.External Quality Analysis of Quality Indicators on Specimen Acceptability
Yuan-Yuan YE ; Wei WANG ; Hai-Jian ZHAO ; Feng-Feng KANG ; Wei-Xing LI ; Zhi-Ming LU ; Wei-Min ZOU ; Yu-Qi JIN ; Wen-Fang HUANG ; Bin XU ; Fa-Lin CHEN ; Qing-Tao WANG ; Hua NIU ; Bin-Guo MA ; Jian-Hong ZHAO ; Xiang-Yang ZHOU ; Zuo-Jun SHEN ; Wei-Ping ZHU ; Yue-Feng L(U) ; Liang-Jun LIU ; Lin ZHANG ; Li-Qiang WEI ; Xiao-Mei GUI ; Yan-Qiu HAN ; Jian XU ; Lian-Hua WEI ; Pu LIAO ; Xiang-Ren A ; Hua-Liang WANG ; Zhao-Xia ZHANG ; Hao-Yu WU ; Sheng-Miao FU ; Wen-Hua PU ; Lin PENG ; Zhi-Guo WANG
Journal of Modern Laboratory Medicine 2018;33(2):134-138,142
Objective To analyze the status of quality indicators(QI) on specimen acceptability and establish preliminary qual ity specification.Methods Web based External Quality Assessment system was used to collect data of laboratories partici pated in "Medical quality control indicators in clinical laboratory" from 2015 to 2017,including once in 2015 and 2017 and twice in 2016.Rate and sigma scales were used to evaluate incorrect sample type,incorrect sample container,incorrect fill level and anticoagulant sample clotted.The 25th percentile (P25) and 75th percentile (P75) of the distribution of each QI were employed to establish the high,medium and low specification.Results 5 346,7 593,5 950 and 6 874 laboratories sub mitted the survey results respectively.The P50 of biochemistry (except incorrect fill level),immunology and microbiology reach to 6σ.The P50 of clinical laboratory is 4 to 6σ except for incorrect sample container.There is no significant change of the continuous survey results.Based on results in 2017 to establish the quality specification,the P25 and P75 of the four QIs is 0 and 0.084 4 %,0 and 0.047 6 %,0 and 0.114 2 %,0 and 0.078 4 %,respectively.Conclusion According to the results of the survey,most laboratories had a faire performance in biochemistry,immunology and microbiology,and clinical laboratory needs to be strengthened.Laboratories should strengthen the laboratory information system construction to ensure the actual and reliable data collection,and make a long time monitoring to achieve a better quality.