1.Clinical trial of sacubactril valsartan combined with dagliprazin in the treatment of elderly patients with chronic heart failure and type 2 diabetes mellitus
Kun XU ; Xiao-Min ZHANG ; Jing DANG ; Jun-Hong SHANG
The Chinese Journal of Clinical Pharmacology 2024;40(17):2464-2468
Objective To observe the effect of sacubitril valsartan combined with dapagliflozin on cardiac function and blood glucose fluctuation in elderly patients with chronic heart failure(CHF)and type 2 diabetes mellitus(T2DM).Methods The elderly patients with CHF and T2DM were divided into treatment group and control group.Patients in the control group were given irbesartan tablets,150 mg each time,metoprolol sustained-release tablets,qd,with an initial dose of 23.75 mg,and the dose was increased to 47.5 mg after 2 weeks,and dapagliflozin tablets was taken in the morning,qd,5 mg each time.If the patient was well tolerated,the dose was increased to 10 mg each time.The treatment group was given dapagliflozin tablets,qd,5 mg each time,and the dose was increased to 10 mg each time if the patient was well tolerated.At the same time,sacubitril valsartan sodium tablets was given,bid,50 mg each time.If the patient was well tolerated,the dose should be doubled every 2-4 weeks,not exceeding 200 mg each time.The two groups were treated for 6 months.The cardiac function,blood glucose fluctuation,drug safety and prognosis were compared between the two groups.Results Forty-seven cases and forty-nine cases were included in the treatment and control group,respectively.After treatment,the total effective rates in the treatment and control group were 93.62%(44 cases/47 cases)and 79.59%(39 cases/49 cases),and there were significant differences(P<0.05).After treatment,left ventricular ejection fraction(LVEF)in the treatment group group and the control group were(55.34±8.22)and(46.59±6.80)%;cardiac indexes(CI)were(2.54±0.41)and(2.37±0.39)L·min-1·m-2;postprandial glucose excursions(PGE)were(1.45±0.31)and(1.86±0.46)mmol·L-1;the largest amplitudes of glycemic excursions(LAGE)were(3.42±1.05)and(4.47±1.39)mmol·L-1;the incidence rates of major cardiovascular adverse events(MACE)were 4.26%(2 cases/47 cases)and 2.13%(1 cases/47 cases);readmission rates were 18.37%(9 cases/49 cases)and 14.29%(7 cases/49 cases).There were statistically significant differences in the above indexes between the treatment group and the control group.(all P<0.05).The adverse drug reactions in the treatment group were urinary tract infection and hypotension,and the adverse drug reactions in the control group were urinary tract infection and angioedema,and the total adverse drug reaction rate of the two groups was 6.38%(3 cases/47 cases)and 4.08%(2 cases/49 cases),and there was no statistical significance(P>0.05).Conclusion The combined treatment of sacubitril valsartan sodium tablets and dapagliflozin tablets can improve cardiac function,reduce blood glucose fluctuation,increase the total effective rate,and improve the prognosis of elderly patients with CHF and T2DM,with good drug safety.
2.Comparing Outcomes of Banana-Shaped and Straight Cages in Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Lumbar Degenerative Diseases: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Guang-Xun LIN ; Li-Ru HE ; Jin-Niang NAN ; Wen-Bin XU ; Keyi XIAO ; Zhiqiang QUE ; Shang-Wun JHANG ; Chien-Min CHEN ; Ming-Tao ZHU ; Gang RUI
Neurospine 2024;21(1):261-272
Objective:
This meta-analysis aims to refine the understanding of the optimal choice between different cage shapes in transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) by systematically comparing perioperative data, radiological outcomes, clinical results, and complications associated with banana-shaped and straight bullet cages.
Methods:
A meticulous literature search encompassing PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, China Knowledge Network, and Wanfang Data was executed up to October 5, 2023. Inclusion criteria focused on studies comparing banana-shaped and straight bullet cages in TLIF. The quality of included studies was assessed using appropriate tools such as the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for nonrandomized studies. Rigorous evaluations were performed for radiographic outcomes, including disc height (DH), segmental lordosis (SL), lumbar lordosis (LL), subsidence, and fusion rates. Clinical outcomes were meticulously evaluated using visual analogue scale (VAS), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), and complications.
Results:
The analysis incorporated 7 studies, involving 573 patients (297 with banana-shaped cages, 276 with straight cages), all with NOS ratings exceeding 5 stars. No statistically significant differences were observed in operative time, blood loss, or hospitalization between the 2 cage shapes. Banana-shaped cages exhibited greater changes in DH (p = 0.001), SL (p = 0.02), and LL (p = 0.01). Despite statistically higher changes in ODI for straight cages (26.33, p < 0.0001), the actual value remained similar to banana-shaped cages (26.15). Both cage types demonstrated similar efficacy in VAS, complication rates, subsidence, and fusion rates.
Conclusion
Although banana-shaped cages can excel in restoring DH, SL, and LL, straight bullet cages can provide comparable functional improvements, pain relief, and complication rates.
3.Comparing Outcomes of Banana-Shaped and Straight Cages in Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Lumbar Degenerative Diseases: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Guang-Xun LIN ; Li-Ru HE ; Jin-Niang NAN ; Wen-Bin XU ; Keyi XIAO ; Zhiqiang QUE ; Shang-Wun JHANG ; Chien-Min CHEN ; Ming-Tao ZHU ; Gang RUI
Neurospine 2024;21(1):261-272
Objective:
This meta-analysis aims to refine the understanding of the optimal choice between different cage shapes in transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) by systematically comparing perioperative data, radiological outcomes, clinical results, and complications associated with banana-shaped and straight bullet cages.
Methods:
A meticulous literature search encompassing PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, China Knowledge Network, and Wanfang Data was executed up to October 5, 2023. Inclusion criteria focused on studies comparing banana-shaped and straight bullet cages in TLIF. The quality of included studies was assessed using appropriate tools such as the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for nonrandomized studies. Rigorous evaluations were performed for radiographic outcomes, including disc height (DH), segmental lordosis (SL), lumbar lordosis (LL), subsidence, and fusion rates. Clinical outcomes were meticulously evaluated using visual analogue scale (VAS), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), and complications.
Results:
The analysis incorporated 7 studies, involving 573 patients (297 with banana-shaped cages, 276 with straight cages), all with NOS ratings exceeding 5 stars. No statistically significant differences were observed in operative time, blood loss, or hospitalization between the 2 cage shapes. Banana-shaped cages exhibited greater changes in DH (p = 0.001), SL (p = 0.02), and LL (p = 0.01). Despite statistically higher changes in ODI for straight cages (26.33, p < 0.0001), the actual value remained similar to banana-shaped cages (26.15). Both cage types demonstrated similar efficacy in VAS, complication rates, subsidence, and fusion rates.
Conclusion
Although banana-shaped cages can excel in restoring DH, SL, and LL, straight bullet cages can provide comparable functional improvements, pain relief, and complication rates.
4.Comparing Outcomes of Banana-Shaped and Straight Cages in Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Lumbar Degenerative Diseases: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Guang-Xun LIN ; Li-Ru HE ; Jin-Niang NAN ; Wen-Bin XU ; Keyi XIAO ; Zhiqiang QUE ; Shang-Wun JHANG ; Chien-Min CHEN ; Ming-Tao ZHU ; Gang RUI
Neurospine 2024;21(1):261-272
Objective:
This meta-analysis aims to refine the understanding of the optimal choice between different cage shapes in transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) by systematically comparing perioperative data, radiological outcomes, clinical results, and complications associated with banana-shaped and straight bullet cages.
Methods:
A meticulous literature search encompassing PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, China Knowledge Network, and Wanfang Data was executed up to October 5, 2023. Inclusion criteria focused on studies comparing banana-shaped and straight bullet cages in TLIF. The quality of included studies was assessed using appropriate tools such as the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for nonrandomized studies. Rigorous evaluations were performed for radiographic outcomes, including disc height (DH), segmental lordosis (SL), lumbar lordosis (LL), subsidence, and fusion rates. Clinical outcomes were meticulously evaluated using visual analogue scale (VAS), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), and complications.
Results:
The analysis incorporated 7 studies, involving 573 patients (297 with banana-shaped cages, 276 with straight cages), all with NOS ratings exceeding 5 stars. No statistically significant differences were observed in operative time, blood loss, or hospitalization between the 2 cage shapes. Banana-shaped cages exhibited greater changes in DH (p = 0.001), SL (p = 0.02), and LL (p = 0.01). Despite statistically higher changes in ODI for straight cages (26.33, p < 0.0001), the actual value remained similar to banana-shaped cages (26.15). Both cage types demonstrated similar efficacy in VAS, complication rates, subsidence, and fusion rates.
Conclusion
Although banana-shaped cages can excel in restoring DH, SL, and LL, straight bullet cages can provide comparable functional improvements, pain relief, and complication rates.
5.Comparing Outcomes of Banana-Shaped and Straight Cages in Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Lumbar Degenerative Diseases: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Guang-Xun LIN ; Li-Ru HE ; Jin-Niang NAN ; Wen-Bin XU ; Keyi XIAO ; Zhiqiang QUE ; Shang-Wun JHANG ; Chien-Min CHEN ; Ming-Tao ZHU ; Gang RUI
Neurospine 2024;21(1):261-272
Objective:
This meta-analysis aims to refine the understanding of the optimal choice between different cage shapes in transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) by systematically comparing perioperative data, radiological outcomes, clinical results, and complications associated with banana-shaped and straight bullet cages.
Methods:
A meticulous literature search encompassing PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, China Knowledge Network, and Wanfang Data was executed up to October 5, 2023. Inclusion criteria focused on studies comparing banana-shaped and straight bullet cages in TLIF. The quality of included studies was assessed using appropriate tools such as the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for nonrandomized studies. Rigorous evaluations were performed for radiographic outcomes, including disc height (DH), segmental lordosis (SL), lumbar lordosis (LL), subsidence, and fusion rates. Clinical outcomes were meticulously evaluated using visual analogue scale (VAS), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), and complications.
Results:
The analysis incorporated 7 studies, involving 573 patients (297 with banana-shaped cages, 276 with straight cages), all with NOS ratings exceeding 5 stars. No statistically significant differences were observed in operative time, blood loss, or hospitalization between the 2 cage shapes. Banana-shaped cages exhibited greater changes in DH (p = 0.001), SL (p = 0.02), and LL (p = 0.01). Despite statistically higher changes in ODI for straight cages (26.33, p < 0.0001), the actual value remained similar to banana-shaped cages (26.15). Both cage types demonstrated similar efficacy in VAS, complication rates, subsidence, and fusion rates.
Conclusion
Although banana-shaped cages can excel in restoring DH, SL, and LL, straight bullet cages can provide comparable functional improvements, pain relief, and complication rates.
6.Comparing Outcomes of Banana-Shaped and Straight Cages in Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Lumbar Degenerative Diseases: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Guang-Xun LIN ; Li-Ru HE ; Jin-Niang NAN ; Wen-Bin XU ; Keyi XIAO ; Zhiqiang QUE ; Shang-Wun JHANG ; Chien-Min CHEN ; Ming-Tao ZHU ; Gang RUI
Neurospine 2024;21(1):261-272
Objective:
This meta-analysis aims to refine the understanding of the optimal choice between different cage shapes in transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) by systematically comparing perioperative data, radiological outcomes, clinical results, and complications associated with banana-shaped and straight bullet cages.
Methods:
A meticulous literature search encompassing PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, China Knowledge Network, and Wanfang Data was executed up to October 5, 2023. Inclusion criteria focused on studies comparing banana-shaped and straight bullet cages in TLIF. The quality of included studies was assessed using appropriate tools such as the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for nonrandomized studies. Rigorous evaluations were performed for radiographic outcomes, including disc height (DH), segmental lordosis (SL), lumbar lordosis (LL), subsidence, and fusion rates. Clinical outcomes were meticulously evaluated using visual analogue scale (VAS), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), and complications.
Results:
The analysis incorporated 7 studies, involving 573 patients (297 with banana-shaped cages, 276 with straight cages), all with NOS ratings exceeding 5 stars. No statistically significant differences were observed in operative time, blood loss, or hospitalization between the 2 cage shapes. Banana-shaped cages exhibited greater changes in DH (p = 0.001), SL (p = 0.02), and LL (p = 0.01). Despite statistically higher changes in ODI for straight cages (26.33, p < 0.0001), the actual value remained similar to banana-shaped cages (26.15). Both cage types demonstrated similar efficacy in VAS, complication rates, subsidence, and fusion rates.
Conclusion
Although banana-shaped cages can excel in restoring DH, SL, and LL, straight bullet cages can provide comparable functional improvements, pain relief, and complication rates.
7.Epidemiological and Clinical Characteristics of Non-neonatal Tetanus Patients in Guangxi, China: An 11-year Retrospective Study (2011-2021).
Yi Wen KANG ; Guo Feng MAI ; Xiao Ling ZHU ; Shang Qin DENG ; Shi Xiong YANG ; Hong Li TENG ; Zong Xiang YUAN ; Chu Ye MO ; Jian Yan LIN ; Li YE ; Hua Min TANG
Biomedical and Environmental Sciences 2023;36(9):880-885
8.Inhibitory Effect of Resveratrol on the Proliferation of Multiple Myeloma Cells and the Underlying Mechanism.
Nan ZHOU ; Shu-Xing CAO ; Zhen-Zhen WANG ; Jian-Min LUO ; Xiao-Jun LIU ; Yin-Tao SHANG ; Lin YANG
Journal of Experimental Hematology 2023;31(4):1093-1099
OBJECTIVE:
To investigate the effect of resveratrol (RSV) on the proliferation of multiple myeloma (MM) cells and its molecular mechanism.
METHODS:
MM cells (MM1.S, RPMI-8226 and U266) were treated with different concentrations of RSV for 24-72 h. The effect of RSV on the proliferation of MM cells was detected by CCK-8 (cell counting kit-8) assay. RPMI-8226 cells were divided into RSV, miR-21 mimic, RSV+miR-21 mimic, miR-21 inhibitor and RSV+miR-21 inhibitor groups, and transfected with corresponding plasmids. The cell cycle distribution of each group was detected by flow cytometry with propidium iodide (PI) single staining. The cell apoptosis of each group was detected by AnnexinV-FITC/PE-PI double staining. The expression of miR-21 in MM cells treated with RSV and the expression of KLF5 mRNA in each group were detected by qRT-PCR. The expression of KLF5 protein in each group was detected by Western blot.
RESULTS:
RSV inhibited the proliferation and induced apoptosis of MM cells in a time- and dose-dependent manner. After the MM cells were treated with RSV, the number of cells in sub-G1 phase was increased, and that in G2/M phase was decreased. Moreover, RSV significantly downregulated the expression of miR-21 in MM cells, and the inhibitory effect of miR-21 mimic on KLF5 expression in MM cells was counteracted by RSV.
CONCLUSION
RSV may inhibit the proliferation and induce apoptosis of MM cells by inhibiting miR-21 and up-regulating KLF5 expression.
Humans
;
Resveratrol/pharmacology*
;
Multiple Myeloma/metabolism*
;
Cell Proliferation
;
Cell Line, Tumor
;
Apoptosis
;
MicroRNAs/genetics*
9.Expert consensus on late stage of critical care management.
Bo TANG ; Wen Jin CHEN ; Li Dan JIANG ; Shi Hong ZHU ; Bin SONG ; Yan Gong CHAO ; Tian Jiao SONG ; Wei HE ; Yang LIU ; Hong Min ZHANG ; Wen Zhao CHAI ; Man hong YIN ; Ran ZHU ; Li Xia LIU ; Jun WU ; Xin DING ; Xiu Ling SHANG ; Jun DUAN ; Qiang Hong XU ; Heng ZHANG ; Xiao Meng WANG ; Qi Bing HUANG ; Rui Chen GONG ; Zun Zhu LI ; Mei Shan LU ; Xiao Ting WANG
Chinese Journal of Internal Medicine 2023;62(5):480-493
We wished to establish an expert consensus on late stage of critical care (CC) management. The panel comprised 13 experts in CC medicine. Each statement was assessed based on the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) principle. Then, the Delphi method was adopted by 17 experts to reassess the following 28 statements. (1) ESCAPE has evolved from a strategy of delirium management to a strategy of late stage of CC management. (2) The new version of ESCAPE is a strategy for optimizing treatment and comprehensive care of critically ill patients (CIPs) after the rescue period, including early mobilization, early rehabilitation, nutritional support, sleep management, mental assessment, cognitive-function training, emotional support, and optimizing sedation and analgesia. (3) Disease assessment to determine the starting point of early mobilization, early rehabilitation, and early enteral nutrition. (4) Early mobilization has synergistic effects upon the recovery of organ function. (5) Early functional exercise and rehabilitation are important means to promote CIP recovery, and gives them a sense of future prospects. (6) Timely start of enteral nutrition is conducive to early mobilization and early rehabilitation. (7) The spontaneous breathing test should be started as soon as possible, and a weaning plan should be selected step-by-step. (8) The waking process of CIPs should be realized in a planned and purposeful way. (9) Establishment of a sleep-wake rhythm is the key to sleep management in post-CC management. (10) The spontaneous awakening trial, spontaneous breathing trial, and sleep management should be carried out together. (11) The depth of sedation should be adjusted dynamically in the late stage of CC period. (12) Standardized sedation assessment is the premise of rational sedation. (13) Appropriate sedative drugs should be selected according to the objectives of sedation and drug characteristics. (14) A goal-directed minimization strategy for sedation should be implemented. (15) The principle of analgesia must be mastered first. (16) Subjective assessment is preferred for analgesia assessment. (17) Opioid-based analgesic strategies should be selected step-by-step according to the characteristics of different drugs. (18) There must be rational use of non-opioid analgesics and non-drug-based analgesic measures. (19) Pay attention to evaluation of the psychological status of CIPs. (20) Cognitive function in CIPs cannot be ignored. (21) Delirium management should be based on non-drug-based measures and rational use of drugs. (22) Reset treatment can be considered for severe delirium. (23) Psychological assessment should be conducted as early as possible to screen-out high-risk groups with post-traumatic stress disorder. (24) Emotional support, flexible visiting, and environment management are important components of humanistic management in the intensive care unit (ICU). (25) Emotional support from medical teams and families should be promoted through"ICU diaries"and other forms. (26) Environmental management should be carried out by enriching environmental content, limiting environmental interference, and optimizing the environmental atmosphere. (27) Reasonable promotion of flexible visitation should be done on the basis of prevention of nosocomial infection. (28) ESCAPE is an excellent project for late stage of CC management.
Humans
;
Consensus
;
Critical Care/methods*
;
Intensive Care Units
;
Pain/drug therapy*
;
Analgesics/therapeutic use*
;
Delirium/therapy*
;
Critical Illness
10.Preparation and characterization of a recombinant poly-epitopic vaccine EgG1Y162-2 (4) against cystic echinococcosis based on the linker GSGGSG
Jia ZHENG ; Dong-jun ZHANG ; Shang-qi ZHAO ; Yan-min LI ; Yan-xia ZHOU ; Wen-tao ZHOU ; Xiao-tao ZHOU
Chinese Journal of Schistosomiasis Control 2022;34(4):378-382
Objective To perform prokaryotic expression and preliminary characterization of the recombinant poly-epitope vaccine EgG1Y162-2 (4) against cystic echinococcosis. Methods The recombinant poly-epitope vaccine EgG1Y162-2 (4) against Echinococcus granulosus based on the linker GSGGSG was subjected to structural three-dimensional (3D) modeling using immunoinformatics to analyze the structural changes and evaluate the antigenicity of the vaccine. The pET30a-EgG1Y162-2 (4) recombinant plasmid was generated using double digestion with EcoR I and Sal I, and then transformed into competent cells. Following protein induction with isopropyl-β-D-thiogalactoside (IPTG), the prokaryotic expression proteins were characterized using Western blotting, and the antigenicity of the recombinant protein was analyzed using sera from cystic echinococcosis patients and health volunteers. Results The four EgG1Y162-2 proteins coupled by the 3D structure of the recombinant vaccine EgG1Y162-2 (4) presented independent and effective expression and good antigenicity. The highest protein expression was detected in the supernatant following induction of the recombinant plasmid pET30a-EgG1Y162-2 (4) by 0.2 mmol/L IPTG at 37 °C for 4 h, and a pure protein component was seen following elution with 60 mmol/L imidazole. Western blotting analysis of the recombinant multiepitope protein HIS-EgG1Y162-2 (4) showed a band at approximately 39 kDa, and this band was recognized by sera from cystic echinococcosis patients. Conclusion A recombinant poly-epitope vaccine EgG1Y162-2 (4) against cystic echinococcosis has been successfully constructed, which provides a preliminary basis for researches on recombinant multi-epitope vaccine against cystic echinococcosis.

Result Analysis
Print
Save
E-mail