Objective To evaluate the role of transthoracic echocardiography ( T T E ) and transesophageal echocardiography( T EE) in the process of transapical mitral valve repair using a novel edge‐to‐edge device( ValveClamp) and this device′s efficacy and safety in a preliminary clinical trial . Methods Six patients with moderate to severe or severe degenerative mitral regurgitation ( DM R) confirmed by T T E and T EE were enrolled . T T E was performed pre and post procedure as well as 30 days post procedures . Related cardiac structure and hemodynamic parameters ,including mitral regurgitation area ( MRA‐max ) , vena contracta width ( VCW ) ,mitral valve effective orifice area ( M VEOA ) ,left ventricular end diastolic diameter ( LVEDD ) , left ventricular end systolic diameter ( LVESD ) , left ventricular ejection fraction ( LVEF) ,max and mean mitral valve pressure gradient ( M VPG‐max and M VPG‐mean) were recorded and evaluated in a central core laboratory . Results All the procedures were successfully performed .M RA‐max , VCW and M VEOA decreased significantly post procedures ( all P ＜ 0 .000 ) , and they remained no significant changes within 30 days post procedures ( all P ＞ 0 .05 ) . M eanwhile ,M VPG‐max and M VPG‐mean slightly increased ( all P ＜0 .01 ) and left atrial anterior‐posterior dimension attenuated 30 days post procedures( P ＜0 .05) ,but all M VPG‐mean were lower than 5 mm Hg ( 1 mm Hg＝0 .133 kPa) . T here were no significant changes in other hemodynamic parameters ( all P ＞ 0 .05) . Conclusions T ransapical mitral valve repair using ValveClamp can be performed safely and a significant reduction in mitral regurgitation can be achieved in patients with DM R . T EE and T T E facilitate the patient selection for ValveClamp procedures as well as perioperative navigation and assessment .

Objective:To explore the effect of applying individualized progressive nutrition guide sheet in postoperative enteral nutrition (EN) for patients with oral cancer.Methods:Using convenient sampling method, 40 oral cancer patients admitted to Sichuan Cancer Hospital from November 2017 to October 2018 were selected as the control group, and 46 from November 2018 to October 2019 were selected as the observation group. Both groups received EN support but the observation group were applied with progressive nutrition guide sheet. The pre- and post-operative body weight, nutrition related indicators, gastrointestinal symptoms, proportion of patients achieving daily target energy intake, patient/family satisfaction and other indicators were compared between the two groups.Results:There were significant differences in preoperative potassium, total protein and albumin at 7 days after operation, prealbumin at 3 and 7 days after operation, potassium at 3 days after operation and sodium at 3 days after operation between the two groups( Z=4.963, P<0.01; Z=5.094, P<0.01; Z=-2.022, P<0.05; Z=4.048, P<0.01; Z=2.14, P<0.05, Z=-6.04, P<0.01, Z=-7.13, P<0.01). The dynamic changes of potassium and sodium in the two groups were compared before operation, 3 days after operation and 7 days after operation ( F=30.20, F= 118.51, all P<0.01). There were significant differences in incidence of abdominal pain, abdominal distension and diarrhea between the two groups ( χ2=6.91, P=0.009, χ2=10.36, P=0.001, χ2=4.71, P=0.03). There were also significant differences in the proportion of patients achieving daily target energy intake at 1 day, 2 days, 3 days, 4 days, 5 days, and 6 days after operation between the two groups ( χ2=41.77, χ2=45.09, χ2=45.71, χ2=40.53, χ2=29.97, χ2=6.11, all P<0.01). Conclusion:The application of progressive nutrition guidelines in early postoperative EN support for patients with oral cancer can help to improve postoperative nutritional status, avoid potassium, sodium and electrolyte disturbance, alleviate postoperative gastrointestinal symptoms, improve the achievement of daily target energy intake and patient/family satisfaction, and promote disease recovery.