Objective To explore the feasibility and clinical value of metallic stent in the management of unresectable hepatic portal cholangiocarcinoma. Methods A study was investigated in 17 patients with unresectable hepatic portal cholangiocarcinoma from January 1998 to January 2006. A memory alloy biliary stent was placed into the obstructive bile duct for internal biliary drainage. Results Patients’ jaundice disappeared within 2 weeks after the stent placement. Cholangiography via the drainage tube showed patent bile ducts. Follow-up surveys in 16 patients for 4~30 months (mean, 11.5 months) revealed a survival time of 4~20 months (mean, 11 months) in 13 fatal patients. The remaining 3 patients had survived 10, 12.5, and 30 months, respectively. Conclusions Placement of memory metallic biliary stent for patients with unresectable hepatic portal cholangiocarcinoma is an ideal palliative therapy, which is simple and effective for reducing jaundice.

Objective To evaluate smooth muscle protein of 22 kDa (SM22) in the diagnosis of acute intestinal ischemia.Methods 96 healthy adult SD rats were evenly divided into experimental group and control group,with each group subdivided into 6 subgroups,subject respectively to superior mesenteric artery ligation or sham operation.The venous blood samples were extracted from each group rats' right heart atO.5,1,2,4,8,12 h after the operation,for SM22 testing and small intestines tissues for direct immunofluorescence staining of SM22.Results The serum SM22 concentration reached a peak at 4 h (265 ± 15) mg/L,then gradually decreased (P ＜ 0.05).The I-FABP was mainly expressed in the epithelium of intestinal mucosa.During the 4 hours of intestinal ischemia,The number of SM22 positive particles did not change.After 4 hours,the number of SM22 positive granules had gradually decreased compared with the control group (all P ＜ 0.05).Conclusion SM22 mainly exists in the smooth muscle of intestinal,during the ischemic necrosis of the intestinal muscle layer SM22 leaks into blood stream,resulting in high serum levels of SM22 facilitating early diagnosis of acute intestinal ischemia.

Objective To compare endoscopic thyroidectomy via transoral submental approach with open surgery for treating thyroid tumors in terms of the clinical effectiveness.Methods We retrospectively reviewed and analyzed the clinical data and follow-up records of 154 patients in the study,who were hospitalized for thyroidectomy in our hospital from January 2021 to June 2022.Among them,74 cases undergoing endoscopic thyroidectomy via transoral submental approach were assigned to the endoscopic group and 80 cases undergoing traditional open thyroid surgery to the open surgery group.Results All operations were completed successfully and safely in both groups,with no intermediate openings in the endoscopic group.Compared with the open surgery group,the endoscopic group had significantly fewer intraoperative blood losses[(19.46±10.24)mL vs.(32.05±15.87)mL],significantly less incision length[(1.95±0.30)cm vs.(7.05±0.60)cm],significant shorter operative time[(136.66±22.44)min vs.(82.75±15.20)min],and significantly less total postoperative drainage[(111.35±38.92)mL vs.(95.45±36.73)mL](all P＜0.05).Endoscopic patients had superior postoperative pain and cosmetic satisfaction compared to open patients,and the difference was statistically significant(P＜0.05).The two groups had no significant differences in the number of lymph node dissections,parathyroid hormone,and postoperative morbidity between the two groups(P＞0.05).Conclusion The endoscopic thyroidectomy via transoral submental approach can achieve the same clinical effectiveness as the traditional open surgery.However,it is advantageous in reducing intra-operative blood loss,relieving post-operative pain,and achieving a better cosmetic effects of neck incision,thus deserving clinical promotion and application.