1.Comparative analysis of allogeneic bone pad and autogenous bone graft in anterior cervical interbody fusion
Weiji WANG ; Yucheng GUAN ; Xilin GAO ; Minghua JI ; Shuzhang GUO ; Xiangcheng FAN ; Sibo YE
Chinese Journal of Tissue Engineering Research 2014;(39):6252-6257
BACKGROUND:Surgical treatment is often required for fractures of the cervical vertebrae. Anterior interbody fusion technology is stil the main method for the treatment of cervical degeneration or traumatic instability. Here, the self-made oval al ogeneic bone pad can adapt to different height and width of the intervertebral space, in line with the physiological shape of the intervertebral space. OBJECTIVE:By comparison with autogenous iliac crest bone, to evaluate various types of self-designed al ogeneic bone pads on anterior cervical interbody fusion. METHODS:From January 2009 to December 2013, 58 patients with cervical disc herniation were enrol ed and subjected to cervical discectomy and anterior cervical interbody fusion. According to different bone grafts, these patients were divided into al ogeneic bone pad and autogenous iliac bone groups. The course of disease was 12 to 24 months. The postoperative effect was measured by Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score, cervical fusion rate, fusion time, operative time, blood loss and rejection rate. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION:At 6 months postoperatively, the JOA score of two groups had no significant difference at 6 months after treatment (P>0.05);the cervical fusion rates were 83.7%and 87.8%, respectively, in the al ogeneic bone pad and autogenous iliac bone groups, with no significant difference (P>0.05). Fusion time was higher in the al ogeneic bone pad than in the autogenous iliac bone group (P<0.05). The internal fixators in the two groups were firmed without loosening, and there was no rejection during the fol ow-up. Compared with the autogenous iliac crest bone, anterior cervical interbody fusion with al ogeneic bone pad can achieve satisfactory effects, which can be better for intervertebral fusion and cannot induce pain due to bone cutting.
2.Application value of different model of dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in pathological grading of breast invasive ductal carcinoma
Cuiping MA ; Cheng XU ; Qiang GAO ; Xiangcheng SHI ; Zhongqiang SHI
Cancer Research and Clinic 2018;30(7):468-472,476
Objective To explore the application value of different dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) models in pathological grading of breast invasive ductal carcinoma.Methods Forty-five cases of breast invasive ductal carcinoma confirmed by clinical pathology from June 2016 to October 2017 in Shanxi Provincial People's Hospital were enrolled in this study.Grade 1 and 2 invasive ductal carcinomas were classified into the low-grade group,grade 3 invasive ductal carcinomas was classified as the high-grade group.The whole patients underwent DCE-MRI scans.Volume transport constant (Ktrans) was obtained by using the Extended Tofts Linear model with population arterial input function (AIF).Then,the Reference Region model was used to obtain the reference region model volume transport constant(RRKtrans).The performances of histogram analysis of these two quantitative parameters in pathological grading of breast invasive ductal carcinoma were compared.Results The mean,25 %,50 %,75 %,90 % percentiles,kurtosis and skewness of RRKtrans in high grade group were (0.793±0.258)/min,(0.484±0.209)/min,(0.773±0.277)/min,(1.066±0.351)/min,(1.322±0.406)/min,2.647 (1.426,3.679),0.398 (0.297,0.514) respectively,and the corresponding parameters in low grade group were (0.506±0.203)/min,(0.301 ±0.142)/min,(0.487 ±0.211)/min,(0.692±0.281)/min,(0.861±0.323)/min,1.725 (0.779,2.316),0.258 (0.133,0.302) respectively.There were significant differences between the two groups (all P < 0.05).The mean,50 %,75 %,90 %percentiles of Ktrans in high grade groups were (0.099±0.034)/min,(0.110±0.033)/min,(0.132±0.045)/min,(0.140±0.047)/min respectively,and the corresponding parameters in low grade group were (0.067±0.030)/min,(0.082 ±0.067)/min,(0.096 ±0.059)/min,(0.113 ±0.074)/min respectively.There were significant differences between the two groups (all P < 0.05).RRKtrans was superior to Ktrans in distinguishing area under the curve (AUC) of receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) of high and low grading of breast invasive ductal carcinoma.Conclusion RRKtrans obtained by Reference Region model and Ktrans obtained by Population AIF DCE-MRI have some values in pathological grading of breast invasive ductal carcinoma,but the performance of RRKtrans is superior to Kftrans.
3.Risk factors for cement displacement after percutaneous vertebral augmentation for osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture
Xiangcheng GAO ; Jinpeng DU ; Zhen CHANG ; Liang YAN ; Jiayuan WU ; Zhigang ZHAO ; Lin GAO ; Hua HUI ; Dingjun HAO ; Baorong HE
Chinese Journal of Trauma 2022;38(3):205-212
Objective:To explore the risk factors of cement displacement after percutaneous vertebral augmentation in patients with osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture (OVCF).Methods:A case-control analysis was made on clinical data of 1 538 patients with OVCF admitted to Honghui Hospital Affiliated to Xi′an Jiaotong University from January 2016 to June 2021. There were 377 males and 1 161 females, aged from 45-115 years [(71.7±10.8)years]. Percutaneous vertebroplasty (PVP) or percutaneous vertebroplasty (PKP) was performed. Patients were divided into cement displacement group ( n=78) and cement non-displacement group ( n=1 460) according to the radiographic outcomes. Factors related to cement displacement were analyzed by univariate analysis, including age, gender, body mass index (BMI), preoperative bone mineral density, underlying diseases, involved vertebral segments, surgical methods, surgical approaches, cement leakage (anterior edge), viscosity of cement, dispersion ratio of cement, degree of cement interweaving, sagittal position of cement, targeted location of cement, distance from cement to upper and lower endplates and duration of brace wearing. Independent risk factors for bone cement displacement were identified by multivariate Logistic regression analysis. Results:Univariate analysis showed that bone cement displacement was significantly correlated with BMI, preoperative bone mineral density, involved vertebral segments, operation methods, cement leakage (anterior edge), viscosity of cement, dispersion ratio of cement, degree of cement interweaving, sagittal position of cement, targeted location of cement, distance from cement to upper and lower endplates and duration of brace wearing (all P<0.05), but there was no correlation with gender, age, underlying diseases or surgicales approach (all P>0.05). Multivariate Logistic analysis showed that the preoperative bone mineral density ( OR=2.45, 95% CI 1.81-7.50, P<0.01), operation methods ( OR=4.56, 95% CI 1.86-8.44, P<0.01), cement leakage (anterior edge) ( OR=5.77, 95% CI 2.85-9.20, P<0.01), viscosity of cement ( OR=7.36, 95% CI 1.01-1.77, P<0.01), dispersion ratio of cement ( OR=6.84, 95% CI 1.69-13.39, P<0.01), degree of cement interweaving ( OR=8.97, 95% CI 2.29- 14.97, P<0.01), sagittal position of cement ( OR=6.39, 95% CI 1.06-9.47, P<0.01), targeted location of cement ( OR=7.93, 95% CI 1.64-11.84, P<0.01), distance from cement to upper and lower endplates ( OR=6.78, 95% CI 1.84-6.96, P<0.01) and duration of brace wearing ( OR=9.55, 95% CI 2.26- 9.38, P<0.01) were significantly correlated with bone cement displacement after percutaneous vertebral augmentation. Conclusion:Low bone mineral density preoperatively, PKP, cement leakage into the vertebral anterior edge, low viscosity of cement, small dispersion ratio of cement, small degree of cement interweaving, cement filling in the anterior 1/3 and anterior middle 2/3 of the vertebral body in sagittal plane, non-targeted injection of cement, long distance from cement to upper and lower endplates and short duration of brace wearing are independent risk factors of cement displacement after percutaneous vertebral augmentation for OVCF.
4.Case series of unilateral double-channel endoscope-assisted bone graft fusion and internal fixation in the treatment of recurrent lumbar disc herniation
Lin GAO ; Xiangcheng GAO ; Jijun LIU ; Zhen CHANG ; Xiaodong WANG ; Dingjun HAO ; Jinpeng DU ; Zhigang ZHAO ; Liang YAN ; Xiaobin YANG ; Hua HUI ; Baorong HE ; Yunfei HUANG
Journal of Xi'an Jiaotong University(Medical Sciences) 2022;43(5):720-725
【Objective】 To explore the clinical effect of unilateral double-channel endoscope-assisted bone graft fusion and internal fixation (ULIF) in the treatment of recurrent lumbar disc herniation. 【Methods】 The clinical data of 22 patients with recurrent lumbar disc herniation treated by ULIF in our hospital from August 2020 to October 2020 were analyzed retrospectively. The study indicators included intraoperative blood loss, operation time, bed rest time, and hospital stay. The follow-up data included visual analogue score (VAS) of low back pain, Japanese Orthopaedic Association score (JOA), OSwestry disability index (ODI) score, as well as 36 concise health status survey (SF-36) scores before operation, and 1 week and 6 months after operation. 【Results】 The average operation time was (179.15±42.06) minutes, the average intraoperative blood loss was (132.67±41.92) mL, the average bed rest time was (1.51±0.42) days, and the average hospital stay was (4.82±1.13) days. The VAS score of low back pain at 1 week after operation was lower than that before operation (all P<0.000 1), and further decreased during the follow-up. The ODI score, JOA score and SF-36 score of postoperative follow-up were significantly different from those before operation (P<0.05). The satisfaction rate was 86.4% at 1 week after operation and 95.4% at 6 months after operation. The proportion of significant clinical efficacy at 1 week after operation and postoperative 6 months was 18.2% and 63.6%, respectively. 【Conclusion】 ULIF has the advantages of short-term recovery, less intraoperative blood loss, short bed rest and hospital stay, and good medium-term clinical effect. It is a safe and reliable minimally invasive technique for spinal surgeons in the treatment of recurrent lumbar disc herniation.