Objective To explore the effect of comprehensive nursing intervention on the negative emotion and pain of patients with gastrointestinal tumors and undergoing peripherally in-serted central catheter (PICC).Methods Thirty-five PICC patients with gastrointestinal tumors were as observation group from January 2012 to January 2014,and the same type of 30 patients as control group from January 2010 to January 2011.Both groups were given routine nursing,and the observation group was added comprehensive nursing intervention,including healthy education,envi-ronmental and psychological nursing as well as relaxation training.Results The total incidences of complications were 14.29% (5 /35)in observation group and 16.67% (5 /30)in control group (P>0.05).Compared with 1 d before intubation,both self-rating anxiety scale (SAS)and self-rating depression scale (SDS)scores decreased in two groups 7 d after intubation.Visual analogue scale (VAS)scores also went down compared with immediately after intubation,and that in observation group was lower than in control group,with statistical significance (P <0.01).Conclusion Com-prehensive nursing intervention can effectively improve the negative emotion of PICC patients with gastrointestinal tumors and relieve the pain so as to ameliorate the quality of life and promote recov-ery.

Objective: This study aimed to investigate risk perception among first-degree relatives (FDRs) of patients with colorectal cancer (CRC) and to analyze influencing factors. Methods: 406 FDRs of CRC patients were selected as the participants through convenience sampling. A cross-sectional survey was conducted using the Hamilton Anxiety Scale, Colorectal Cancer Risk Perception Assessment Scale, and Colorectal Cancer Health Belief Scale, and relevant influencing factors were analyzed using univariate analysis and multiple linear regression analysis. Results: Participants had an average age of 41.90±14.76 years. The composition of participants included siblings at 45.9%, parents at 4.2%, and children at 49.4%. The risk perception score of 2.80±0.96 was obtained from participants. The Pearson correlation analysis results demonstrated that the total anxiety score of participants was positively correlated with the total risk perception score (r=0.39, p<.001), and the health belief score was also positively correlated with the risk perception score (r=0.49, p<.001). Moreover, the multiple regression analysis results revealed that the risk perception of participants was mainly affected by their education level, monthly household income per person, health beliefs, and level of anxiety (R2 =0.34, F=21.92, p<.001). Conclusion Healthcare professionals should place greater emphasis on assessing risk perception among participants, with a particular focus on those with lower education levels, lower incomes, and weaker health beliefs. They should also promptly monitor changes in family members' emotions and develop personalized clinical intervention plans based on individual characteristics, aiming to enhance this group's risk awareness and prevent the onset of disease.

Objective: This study aimed to investigate risk perception among first-degree relatives (FDRs) of patients with colorectal cancer (CRC) and to analyze influencing factors. Methods: 406 FDRs of CRC patients were selected as the participants through convenience sampling. A cross-sectional survey was conducted using the Hamilton Anxiety Scale, Colorectal Cancer Risk Perception Assessment Scale, and Colorectal Cancer Health Belief Scale, and relevant influencing factors were analyzed using univariate analysis and multiple linear regression analysis. Results: Participants had an average age of 41.90±14.76 years. The composition of participants included siblings at 45.9%, parents at 4.2%, and children at 49.4%. The risk perception score of 2.80±0.96 was obtained from participants. The Pearson correlation analysis results demonstrated that the total anxiety score of participants was positively correlated with the total risk perception score (r=0.39, p<.001), and the health belief score was also positively correlated with the risk perception score (r=0.49, p<.001). Moreover, the multiple regression analysis results revealed that the risk perception of participants was mainly affected by their education level, monthly household income per person, health beliefs, and level of anxiety (R2 =0.34, F=21.92, p<.001). Conclusion Healthcare professionals should place greater emphasis on assessing risk perception among participants, with a particular focus on those with lower education levels, lower incomes, and weaker health beliefs. They should also promptly monitor changes in family members' emotions and develop personalized clinical intervention plans based on individual characteristics, aiming to enhance this group's risk awareness and prevent the onset of disease.

Objective: This study aimed to investigate risk perception among first-degree relatives (FDRs) of patients with colorectal cancer (CRC) and to analyze influencing factors. Methods: 406 FDRs of CRC patients were selected as the participants through convenience sampling. A cross-sectional survey was conducted using the Hamilton Anxiety Scale, Colorectal Cancer Risk Perception Assessment Scale, and Colorectal Cancer Health Belief Scale, and relevant influencing factors were analyzed using univariate analysis and multiple linear regression analysis. Results: Participants had an average age of 41.90±14.76 years. The composition of participants included siblings at 45.9%, parents at 4.2%, and children at 49.4%. The risk perception score of 2.80±0.96 was obtained from participants. The Pearson correlation analysis results demonstrated that the total anxiety score of participants was positively correlated with the total risk perception score (r=0.39, p<.001), and the health belief score was also positively correlated with the risk perception score (r=0.49, p<.001). Moreover, the multiple regression analysis results revealed that the risk perception of participants was mainly affected by their education level, monthly household income per person, health beliefs, and level of anxiety (R2 =0.34, F=21.92, p<.001). Conclusion Healthcare professionals should place greater emphasis on assessing risk perception among participants, with a particular focus on those with lower education levels, lower incomes, and weaker health beliefs. They should also promptly monitor changes in family members' emotions and develop personalized clinical intervention plans based on individual characteristics, aiming to enhance this group's risk awareness and prevent the onset of disease.

Objective: This study aimed to investigate risk perception among first-degree relatives (FDRs) of patients with colorectal cancer (CRC) and to analyze influencing factors. Methods: 406 FDRs of CRC patients were selected as the participants through convenience sampling. A cross-sectional survey was conducted using the Hamilton Anxiety Scale, Colorectal Cancer Risk Perception Assessment Scale, and Colorectal Cancer Health Belief Scale, and relevant influencing factors were analyzed using univariate analysis and multiple linear regression analysis. Results: Participants had an average age of 41.90±14.76 years. The composition of participants included siblings at 45.9%, parents at 4.2%, and children at 49.4%. The risk perception score of 2.80±0.96 was obtained from participants. The Pearson correlation analysis results demonstrated that the total anxiety score of participants was positively correlated with the total risk perception score (r=0.39, p<.001), and the health belief score was also positively correlated with the risk perception score (r=0.49, p<.001). Moreover, the multiple regression analysis results revealed that the risk perception of participants was mainly affected by their education level, monthly household income per person, health beliefs, and level of anxiety (R2 =0.34, F=21.92, p<.001). Conclusion Healthcare professionals should place greater emphasis on assessing risk perception among participants, with a particular focus on those with lower education levels, lower incomes, and weaker health beliefs. They should also promptly monitor changes in family members' emotions and develop personalized clinical intervention plans based on individual characteristics, aiming to enhance this group's risk awareness and prevent the onset of disease.

Objective To explore the effect of comprehensive nursing intervention on the negative emotion and pain of patients with gastrointestinal tumors and undergoing peripherally in-serted central catheter (PICC).Methods Thirty-five PICC patients with gastrointestinal tumors were as observation group from January 2012 to January 2014,and the same type of 30 patients as control group from January 2010 to January 2011.Both groups were given routine nursing,and the observation group was added comprehensive nursing intervention,including healthy education,envi-ronmental and psychological nursing as well as relaxation training.Results The total incidences of complications were 14.29% (5 /35)in observation group and 16.67% (5 /30)in control group (P>0.05).Compared with 1 d before intubation,both self-rating anxiety scale (SAS)and self-rating depression scale (SDS)scores decreased in two groups 7 d after intubation.Visual analogue scale (VAS)scores also went down compared with immediately after intubation,and that in observation group was lower than in control group,with statistical significance (P <0.01).Conclusion Com-prehensive nursing intervention can effectively improve the negative emotion of PICC patients with gastrointestinal tumors and relieve the pain so as to ameliorate the quality of life and promote recov-ery.