Objective To study the efficacy and safety of sedation for gastroscopy with a combined use of propofol and midazolam compared to a control, non-sedative group , with the goal of establishing a method of painless gastroscopy. Methods One thousand nine hundred fifteen patients in sedative group were given intravenous propofol and midazolam . Patients feeling and discomfort, operators satisfaction and operative duration were compared with the control group ( n = 640, without sedation ) . The changes of blood pressure, heart rate and blood oxygen saturation were recorded and analysed. Results One thousand nine hundred patients(99. 2% ) in sedative group and 224 patients(35. 0% ) in control group did not complain any discomfort and pain during gastroscopy(P

Objective To explore the application of propofol combined with midazolam intrave-nous anesthesia in pediatric upper gastrointestinal endoscopy, Methods A total of 497 ASA Ⅰ～Ⅱ patients who received sedative upper gastrointestinal endoscopy were assigned to a children group (2～14 years) and an adults group (18～65 years). The 2 groups were treated with midazolam (0.02～0.03 mg/kg, iv) and propofol (0.6～0.7 mg/s, iv) with an interval of 3～5 minutes. Enterseopy was inserted at light sleep, relaxing muscles, and disappearance of eyelash relaxation. Combining of pro-endoscopy, reaction to intravenous administration, dose of propofol, reaction to en-doscopy, time of returning to consciousness, changes of SpO2, R, HR, and BP, and sedative quali-ty were evaluated. Results Good sedation of the 2 groups after intravenous administration was ob-served. Rate of combining of pro-endoscopy in children was lower (42%) than that in adults (100%). The incidence of restlessness, hyperphasia, temporary decreasing of SpO2, dose of propofol of per kilogram weight, time of returning to consciousness in the children were 82.7%, 17%, 2.4 mg/kg, and (17.5±3.2)min, respectively, which were all higher in the adults [9%,4%,1.4 mg/kg, and (9.5±1.3)min, P<0.01]. HR and BP decreased in the 2 groups, and recovered rapidly after the endoscopy. There was no significant difference between the 2 groups (P>0.05). Conclusion It is safe and effective to use propofol combined with midazolam intravenous sedation anesthesia in pediatric upper gastrointestinal endoscopy.

Objective:The study was attempted to improve the manipulation and eliminate patient's fear for gastroscopy combined with intravenous injection.Methods:A total of 1350 patients wasrandomized into test group (n=1100 given intraveous protofol and midazolam)and the control (n=250,without anesthetics).Patient's feeling,heart rate,blood oxygen saturation,blood pressure,operative duration and operator' satisfaction were recored and analysed.Results:Data in test group showed less complaints,easier manipulation,high satisfaction and no difference in operative duration and blood oxygen saturation as compared with the control.After intravenous administration of protofol and midazolam,patient's heart rate and blood pressure (systolic and diastolic pressure) significantly decreased.Conclusions:With intravenous use of protofol and midazolam,gastroscopy can be achieved effectively,painlessly and safely.

Objective To explore the safety and the efficacy of the two-stage sedation administration method for the elderly in gastroscopic examination. Methods 128 elderly patients were divided into two groups according to age and body mass index (BMI), and were given sedation treatment before gastroscopic examination by two-stage administration method(group TSAM, n= 64)and continual administration method (group CAM, n= 64) of analgesics respectively. The following major data were recorded : ( 1 ) mean artery pressure (MAP) ;( 2 ) Blood oxygen saturation ( SpO2 ) ;(3)sedation level;(4) recovery time;(5) the amount of propofol used for sedation;(6) electrocardiogram (ECG) ;(7)the degree of pharyngeal malaise;(8) the oblivion degree of malaise. Results There was no significant difference in MAP alteration between two methods(P>0. 05). Compared with group CAM, the decreased degree of SpO2 was slighter and no patient's SpO2 was lower than 90% in group TSAM (P<0. 05). Fifty-seven patients in group TSAM fell into sedative state for gastroscopy with OAA/S score 2, while sixty patients in group CAM with OAA/S score 2, which represented a deeper sedation level in group CAM (P<0. 01). The recovery time was shorter and the amount of propofol used was significantly less in group TSAM than in group CAM (P<0. 01). During the process of gastroscopic exmaination, ST-T change and arrhythmia in ECG were not seen in either of these two groups. The pharyngeal malaise of patients in group TSAM was more severe than in group CAM (P<0. 01). However, there was no difference in the oblivion degree of malaise between two methods(P>0.05). Conclusions The two-stage sedative administration method is safer and more effective for gastroscopic examination for the elderly.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the efficacy and security of different administrations of propofol on the sedation in upper gastrointestinal endoscopic procedures in snoring patients. METHODS: A total of 1,117 patients with snoring in ASA I-II level, who underwent gastroscopy and received propofol as sedation, were assigned to Group A, Group B, and Group C.These groups had different administration methods of propofol. The dose of propofol, response to endoscopic procedures, changes of oxygen saturation of arterial blood (SPO₂), incidence of severe respiratory depression and sedation quality assessed by operators were observed. RESULTS: The incidence of transient decline in SPO₂ in Group A, B, and C were 50.4%, 3.1%, and 18.5%, respectively. The doses of propofol of Group A, B, and C were (108.50±18.02) mg, (57.50±7.50) mg, and (79.80±10.02) mg, respectively, with significant difference (P<0.05). The incidence of severe respiratory depression in Group A was 1.2%, but Group B and C were 0%. Compared with Group A(100%) and C(100%), the satisfaction rate of sedation quality in Group B was 74%, with significant difference (P<0.05). CONCLUSION During the upper gastrointestinal endoscopic procedures, snoring patients are premedicated with propofol in various uses by steps or one slow administration. Both methods are safe and effective to reduce the incidence of severe respiratory depression, and patients have no memory of the procedure.
Adult ; Endoscopy, Gastrointestinal ; methods ; Female ; Gastrointestinal Diseases ; complications ; diagnosis ; Humans ; Hypnotics and Sedatives ; administration & dosage ; adverse effects ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Propofol ; administration & dosage ; adverse effects ; Snoring ; complications

OBJECTIVE: To determine the efficiency and safety of capsule endoscopy for patients with intestinal diseases. METHODS: Given M2A capsule endoscopy (CE) was performed on 81 patients with obscure gastrointestinal bleeding and obscure abdominal pain, and the clinical data were analyzed. RESULTS: In the 81 patients, 9 showed negative finding, CE didn't reach the small intestine in 1 patient. In the other 71 patients, 132 intestinal lesions were detected, and the total positive rate of CE for intestinal diseases was 88.75%. The findings consisted of 36 intestinal inflammation, 24 angiopathy, 16 protuberant lesions, 15 mutipolypi in the intestine, 12 blood in the intestine, 11 single or multiple ulcers, 6 ascarid in the intestine, 5 diverticula, 1 ankylostomiasis, 1 intestinal dysplasia with internal fistula, and the 5 intestinal Crohn's disease. Ten patients with protuberant lesion were verified by surgical operation and pathology, and the 5 stromal tumors diagnosed by CE were confirmed by pathological examination, while no one of Crohn's disease, lymphoma and angioma was diagnosed correctly by CE. All images of CE were good. All the patients had no complications. CONCLUSION Capsule endoscopy is a safe and effective procedure, with a high positive rate, but the diagnostic yield is limited, which can be used for intestinal diseases.
Abdominal Pain ; diagnosis ; Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Capsule Endoscopy ; Female ; Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage ; diagnosis ; Humans ; Inflammatory Bowel Diseases ; diagnosis ; Intestinal Diseases ; diagnosis ; Intestine, Small ; pathology ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Retrospective Studies ; Sensitivity and Specificity ; Young Adult

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect of the bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells (BMSCs) transplant through peripheral vein, portal vein and hepatic artery into liver under the condition of constant magnetic field and to analyze the therapeutic effect on liver function recovery. METHODS: BMSCs were isolated, purified and induced to differentiate into liver-like cells, which were double labeled by Feridex-GFP. The double-labeled BMSCs were transplanted into liver through different ways including peripheral vein, portal vein and hepatic artery with or without constant magnetic field in vitro. The rats were sacrificed at the 1st, 2nd, 3rd and 4th week after the transplant. ALB, ALT, AST were tested. The liver tissue biopsy was collected. GFP-positive cells in liver were observed by fluorescence microscopy. RESULTS: Double-labeled BMSCs could be transplanted into liver through all ways. GFP expression was found in liver in all groups at the 4th week and the liver functions were improved. Based on the long term efficacy, the liver functions recovered more rapidly in the portal vein + constant magnetic field group and the hepatic artery + constant magnetic field group. CONCLUSION BMSCs transplantation can reduce acute liver damage. The first choice for BMSCs transplantation was via portal vein or hepatic artery under the condition of constant magnetic field. The second choice was via peripheral vein alone or under the condition of constant magnetic field.
Animals ; Dextrans ; Green Fluorescent Proteins ; Liver Diseases ; therapy ; Magnetic Fields ; Magnetite Nanoparticles ; Mesenchymal Stem Cell Transplantation ; Rats

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the efficacy and risk of midazolam and propofol for sedation during colonoscopy procedures in adults of different age groups. METHODS: A total of 180 patients undergoing colonoscopy were allocated to 3 groups: a young adult group (n=45, 18-44 years), a mid-aged group (n=78,45-64 years) and an elderly group (n=57, 65-80 years). All patients were premedicated with midazolam 0.02-0.03 mg/kg and propofol 0.5-2.5 mg/kg. The pulse rate, arterial pressure, and oxygen saturation for each patient were monitored continuously before, during and after the procedure. RESULTS: The doses of midazolam and propofol for the young adults were significantly higher than that for the mid-aged and the elderly (P<0.01). Based on the view of gastroenterologists, the satisfied rate of sedation quality was significantly higher in the elderly group than that in the young or the mid-aged group (P<0.01). There were significant changes in the arterial pressure in all groups compared with the baseline level (P<0.01), but there was no significant difference among the 3 groups. Other parameters such as heart rate, saturation of O2, and the rate of severe adverse reaction among the 3 groups were not significantly different (P>0.05). CONCLUSION Higher dose of midazolam and propofol is needed to obtain the sedation quality in young adults. Whereas for the elderly, properly reducing the dose of midazolam and propofol may still keep the sedation quality during colonoscopy procedures.
Adolescent ; Adult ; Age Factors ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Colonoscopy ; methods ; Conscious Sedation ; methods ; Drug Synergism ; Female ; Humans ; Hypnotics and Sedatives ; administration & dosage ; Male ; Midazolam ; administration & dosage ; Middle Aged ; Propofol ; administration & dosage ; Young Adult

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the influence of endoscopic variceal ligation (EVL) on liver function and analyze the risk factors of rebleeding after EVL. METHODS: A total of 137 cirrhotic patients with esophageal varices who received EVL were retrospectively analyzed, and divided into group A, B, and C according to the Child-Pugh scores of liver function. We compared the liver function 1 week preoperatively and postoperatively. The patients were further divided into a rebleeding group and a non-rebleeding group after the EVL, and risk factors about rebleeding were analyzed. RESULTS: There was no significant difference on ALT, AST, T-Bil, and D-Bil either preoperatively or postoperatively in group A, B, and C (P>0.05). Thirteen patients (9.49%) rebled after the EVL. The course of disease, liver function, prothrombin time, and mass ascites were the risk factors of rebleeding. CONCLUSION EVL has no obvious effect on liver function, and the course of disease, liver function, prothrombin time and mass ascites are risk factors of rebleeding after EVL.
Adult ; Endoscopy ; methods ; Esophageal and Gastric Varices ; etiology ; surgery ; Female ; Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage ; etiology ; prevention & control ; surgery ; Humans ; Ligation ; methods ; Liver ; physiopathology ; Liver Cirrhosis ; complications ; etiology ; physiopathology ; Logistic Models ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Recurrence ; Risk Factors ; Secondary Prevention