Objective: To compare the clinical efficacies of subgingival glycine air polishing and ultrasonic scaling combined with 0.12% chlorhexidine rinsing on patients with early peri-implant diseases (peri-implant mucositis and early peri-implantitis). Methods: Twenty-two systemically healthy patients with totally 42 implants and early peri-implant diseases, were recruited in this study. The patients were randomly divided into the test group and the control group. Patients in the test group were treated with subgingival glycine air polishing and patients in the control group were treated with ultrasonic scalers combined with 0.12% chlorhexidine rinsing. Periodontal parameters such as probing depth, bleeding index, plaque index and clinical attachment loss, at baseline and 2 months after treatment, respectively, were collected and compared between the test and control groups. Results: For the natural teeth, the parameters of probing depth, bleeding index, plaque index and attachment loss in the two groups were significantly improved after treatments (medians were 0.48 mm vs 0.22 mm, 1.00 vs-0.13, 0.38 vs 0.50, 0.48 mm vs 0.22 mm, respectively for test and control group). There was no statistical difference of median between the two groups after treatment except for that of the attachment loss (medians, 0.48 mm vs 0.22 mm, P=0.034). For the implants, differences of parameters in the two groups at baseline were insignificant. After treatments, the probing depths significantly decreased by 0.67 mm and 0.33 mm in the test group and the control group, respectively. The inter-group differences, however, were insignificant. Significant difference of the bleeding index after treatment was found in the test group (P=0.019), but not in the control group. No adverse reactions were found on patients in the two groups after treatments. Conclusions Efficacy of subgingival glycine air polishing and ultrasonic scaling combined with 0.12% chlorhexidine rinsing is competitive on patients with early peri-implant diseases. However, the former treatment may be more effective oncontrolling the early peri-implant inflammation.

Objective: To establish a quantitative three-dimensional method based on intraoral scan to evaluate the changes of soft tissue, and to evaluate the changes of supracrestal gingival thickness (SGT) in skeletal class Ⅲ patients induced by periodontal regenerative and corticotomy surgery (PRCS). Methods: Twenty-two systematically and periodontally healthy skeletal class Ⅲ patients (4 males and 18 females, aged between 19 and 35 years), who were in need of combined orthodontic-orthognathic treatment and referred to the Department of Periodontology from the Department of Orthodontics and the Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Peking University School and Hospital of Stomatology from January, 2018 to March, 2019, were collected in the study. The teeth involved were 112 anterior teeth (46 maxillary anterior teeth and 66 mandibular anterior teeth). PRCS in anterior tooth area was conducted before orthodontic decompensation. Probing depth (PD), bleeding index (BI) and keratinized gingiva width (KGW) were recorded before surgery and 6 months post-surgery. The intraoral digital impressions of maxillary and mandibular anterior teeth were obtained by 3-shape intraoral scanner before surgery and 6 months after surgery. The Standard Tessellation Language (STL) files were processed using Geomagic qualify 12.2 software to establish the soft tissue morphological measurement model, and to quantitatively analyze the changes of gingival thickness situated 1 to 2 mm apical to the free gingival margin on the median sagittal measurement plane. Results: Probing depth and bleeding index had no significant difference before and 6 months after operation (P>0.05). KGW in 6-month post-operation group [(5.18±2.32) mm] was significantly higher than that in pre-operation group [(4.22±1.43) mm] (P<0.05). Supracrestal gingival thickness situated 1 to 2 mm apical to the free gingival margin also significantly increased 6 months after surgery (P<0.05). The changes of gingival thickness situated 1 to 2 mm apical to the free gingival margin in the upper anterior area were (0.68±0.56) and (1.00±0.69) mm, respectively. The changes in the lower anterior area were (0.38±0.42) and (0.58±0.45) mm, respectively. The gingival changes of the upper anterior teeth were also significantly higher than those of the lower anterior teeth (P<0.01). Conclusions The described quantitative measurement based on intraoral scan could be an effective method for quantitative evaluation of the changes of soft tissue. PRCS could safely increase the supracrestal gingival thickness as well as KGW in skeletal class Ⅲ patients who were in need of combined orthodontic-orthognathic treatment.