1.Effects of Intravenous Nefopam on Pain Relief in Patients with Acute Postoperative Pain: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
Yehun JIN ; Seung-Kwon MYUNG ; Hangil KANG ; Woosik EOM ; Daehyun KIM
Korean Journal of Health Promotion 2024;24(2):56-66
Background:
Although intravenous nefopam has been used for opioid-sparing strategy and pain relief, randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have shown inconsistent findings.
Methods:
We searched core databases, PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane library for RCTs on this research question in December 2022. Standardized mean difference (SMD) and weighted mean difference (WMD) were calculated using a random-effects meta-analysis.
Results:
Of 708 studies identified from the databases, a total of 17 RCTs (n=1,173 patients) that met the inclusion criteria were included in the final meta-analysis. Overall, the consumption of cumulative opioid analgesics was significantly lower in the nefopam group than the control group, on arrival in the postanesthesia care unit (PACU) (SMD, −0.70; 95% confidence interval [CI], −1.01 to −0.39; I2= 55.1%; n=7), at 24 hours (SMD, −0.65; 95% CI, −1.09 to −0.20; I2=87.4%; n=9), and 48 hours (SMD, −0.82; 95% CI, −1.40 to −0.24; I2=85.6%; n=6) after surgery. It also showed a significant lower pain score, on arrival in the PACU (WMD, −0.80; 95% CI, −1.27 to −0.32; I2=69.6%; n=7) and 24 hours (WMD, −0.48; 95% CI, −0.79 to −0.16; I2=0.0%, n=5). However, publication bias was observed (asymmetrical funnel plot and P for bias=0.005).
Conclusions
Intravenous nefopam showed an opioid-sparing effect and pain relief in the management of patients with acute postoperative pain.
2.Pulseless Electrical Activity of Unknown Origin during Total Gastrectomy: A case report.
Jae Gyok SONG ; Woosik EOM ; Haejeong JEONG ; Daesoon CHO ; Hye young SHIN
Korean Journal of Anesthesiology 2007;53(2):246-249
Pulseless electrical activity refers to a heterogeneous group of cardiac rhythm disorders, all characterized by pulselessness in the presence of some type of electrical activity other than ventricular tachycardia or ventricular fibrillation. We experienced a case of sudden pulseless electrical activity and cardiac arrest during hetastarch infusion in general anesthesia in an adult who had total gastrectomy. We report this experience with a brief review of literature.
Adult
;
Anesthesia, General
;
Gastrectomy*
;
Heart Arrest
;
Humans
;
Hydroxyethyl Starch Derivatives
;
Tachycardia, Ventricular
;
Ventricular Fibrillation
3.The effects of midazolam and sevoflurane on the GABAA receptors with alternatively spliced variants of the gamma2 subunit.
Woosik EOM ; Jung Min LEE ; Jeongmi PARK ; Kyungho CHOI ; Sung Jun JUNG ; Hee Soo KIM
Korean Journal of Anesthesiology 2011;60(2):109-118
BACKGROUND: Emergence agitation after sevoflurane anesthesia in children can be prevented by midazolam. Alternative splicing of the GABAA receptor changes with age. Therefore, we hypothesized that alternative splicing of the gamma2 subunit affects the GABA current when applying sevoflurane and midazolam. METHODS: We performed the whole-cell patch clamp technique on human embryonic kidney 293 cells that were transfected with alpha1beta2gamma2L or alpha1beta2gamma2S. The concentration-response relations were recorded for midazolam and sevoflurane, and the co-application responses were measured at concentrations of 1.5 nM, 15 nM and 300 nM of midazolam and 0.5%, 2.0% and 4.0% of sevoflurane. Each GABA current was compared with that produced by 5 microM of GABA. RESULTS: The concentration-response relationships for midazolam and sevoflurane were dose-dependent without any differences between the alpha1beta2gamma2L and alpha1beta2gamma2S subtypes. 1.5 nM and 15 nM of midazolam did not significantly enhance the current after treatment with 0.5% sevoflurane for both subtypes. The current after treatment with 2.0% sevoflurane was enhanced by 1.5 nM midazolam for the alpha1beta2gamma2S subtype, but not for the alpha1beta2gamma2L subtype. In the case of 2.0% sevoflurane with 15 nM of midazolam, and 4.0% sevoflurane with 300 nM of midazolam, the GABA currents were significantly enhanced for both subtypes. CONCLUSIONS: These results show that the difference in the gamma2 subunit cannot explain the emergence agitation after sevoflurane anesthesia in children in vitro. This suggests that co-application of sevoflurane and midazolam enhances the GABA current according to the alternative splicing of the gamma2 subunit and the concentration of both drugs.
Alternative Splicing
;
Anesthesia
;
Child
;
Dihydroergotamine
;
gamma-Aminobutyric Acid
;
Humans
;
Kidney
;
Methyl Ethers
;
Midazolam