OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of ferritin-folate-cyanocobalamin supplementation for prevention of anemia during pregnancy. METHODS: The authors conducted a clinical investigation on 50 pregnant women from 20th to 36th gestational weeks. The cobination of cyanocobalamin coenzyme 500mg, folic coenzyme 800mcg, and ferritin 20mg constituted the supplementation. The parameters examined in first trimester as baseline, before treatment(at 20th weeks), and after treatment(at 36th weeks) were : hemoglobin, hematocrit, ferritin, mean corpuscular hemoglobin(MCH), mean corpuscular hemoglobin concentration(MCHC), mean corpuscular volume(MCV), red blood cell count(RDW), folic acid, and vit. BPaired sample t-test was used for comparison. RESULTS: The results indicated a significant increase in the value of hemoglobin(p<0.05) and hematocrit(p<0.01) in comparison to before and after the treatment. The values of serum ferritin, folic acid, vitamin Bwere increased after the treatment compared to those of before the treatment, though there was no statistical significance. The results of MCV, MCH, MCHC, and RDW showed no statistically significant in comparison to before and after the treatment. CONCLUSIONS: These data indicate that supplementing ferritin 20mg-folate 800mcg-cyanocobalamine 500mcg per day from 20th to 36th weeks' gestation can increase values of hemoglobin, hematocrit, and ferritin concentration and can be cosidered as an appropriate method to prevent iron deficient anemia. It also might increase the value of folic acid and vitamin B12, concentration, but further study is stiU needed to determine whether the supplementation of folate and cyanocobalamine in combination with iron can have better eflicacy than iron alone in prevention of iron deficiency anemia.
Anemia* ; Anemia, Iron-Deficiency ; Erythrocyte Indices ; Erythrocytes ; Female ; Ferritins* ; Folic Acid* ; Hematocrit ; Humans ; Iron ; Pregnancy Trimester, First ; Pregnancy* ; Pregnant Women ; Vitamin B 12* ; Vitamins

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to understand the pathogenesis of the enophthalmos of Horner's syndrome. METHODS: We performed right cervical sympathectomy in 10 Sprague-Dawley rats weighing 200~300 grams at 8 weeks of age. We obtained bilateral extraocular muscle and fat from all 10 rats. These tissues were observed under light and electron microscopy. RESULTS: After 8 weeks, ptosis and enophthalmos were seen in the right eye in all rats. We found no change bilateral fat, but the right extraocular muscle fibers had smaller diameters than the left. The right intermuscular distance was longer than the left upon light microscopy and the right extraocular muscle contained fewer and smaller mitochondria than the left extraocular muscle upon electron microscopy. CONCLUSIONS: Based on these results, it is believed that enophthalmos resulted from extraocular muscle atrophy that resulted from decreasing metabolism of mitochondria in Horner's syndrome. However, enophthalmos in Horner's syndrome requires more intensive study.
Animals ; Enophthalmos ; Eye ; Horner Syndrome ; Light ; Microscopy ; Microscopy, Electron ; Mitochondria ; Muscles ; Muscular Atrophy ; Rats ; Rats, Sprague-Dawley ; Sympathectomy

BACKGROUND: induction of analgesia is frequently required during undergoing reduction of fractures or dislocation in the emergency department. METHODto induce analgesia should be easy, convenient, and safe because patients are not always in fasting state. Nitrous oxide inhalation has been known as a good method of analgesia in emergency patients. PURPOSE: This study was aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of nitrous oxide analgesia in the emergency department. METHOD: We prospectively studied 34 patients undergone reductions of fractures in the emergency department. Nitrous-oxide was the sole source of analgesia. The Visual Analogue Scale(VAS) was rated by the emergency physician before nitrous oxide inhalation,5 minutes after inhalation and reduction procedures. RESULTS: No complication such as vomiting, respiratory depression, or a change in oxygen saturation resulted from the use of nitrous-oxide. Ninety one percent of patients obtained an analgesic effect. However, 9% of patients did not experience any analgesic effect after inhalation of nitrous oxide. In subgroup analysis for analgesic effect of nitrous-oxide, nitrous oxide provided only partial analgesia for acute pain in open fracture group. VAS was significantly lower after inhalation than before inhalation of nitrous oxide in simple fracture group. However, VAS of simple fracture group was increased during closed reductions, which indicated incomplete relief of pain by nitrous oxide. Nitrous oxide inhalation foiled to relieve pain during reduction in patients with open fracture or dislocation. CONCLUSION: Administration of nitrous-oxide, when used as the sole source of analgesia, is not the ideal method of analgesia during reduction of fractures or dislocations.
Acute Pain ; Analgesia ; Dislocations ; Emergencies* ; Emergency Service, Hospital* ; Fasting ; Fractures, Open ; Humans ; Inhalation ; Nitrous Oxide* ; Oxygen ; Prospective Studies ; Respiratory Insufficiency ; Vomiting

Transcutaneous cardiac pacing(TCP) is a rapid, safe, noninvasive and easily utilized form of emergency cardiac pacing, with hemodynamically similar to transvenous cardiac pacing. This paper reports the result of transcutaneous pacing in a series of patients in emergency department.32 patients with bradyanhythmia were enrolled during the study period. TCP was successful in 29(91%) patients. No evidence of electrical capture was seen in two patients in asystole and a patient with ventricular escape rhythm. Mean capture threshold was 66 mA. Transvenous pacemaker was inserted in 18(56%) of the 32 patients during transcutaneous cardiac pacing. Twenty(61%) of the 32 patients survived and eventually discharged. Ten patients(31%) were died of uncorrectable underlying disease in spite of successful ECG capture and palpable pulse by TCP. In conclusion, TCP is a reliable, noninvasive method that offers the possibility to initiate pacing within seconds and can be used by any emergency medical staff. In our opinion, it should be considered as the first choice of emergency treatment of hemodynamically unstable bradyarrhythmia.
Bradycardia* ; Electrocardiography ; Emergencies* ; Emergency Service, Hospital* ; Emergency Treatment ; Heart Arrest ; Humans ; Medical Staff ; United Nations

Pulmonary artery aneurysms are extremely rare. Even though their etiology or mechanism remain uncertain, congetial anenrysms follow the congenital heart defects which elevate the pulmonary artery pressure or increase the pulmonary blood flow and acquired aneurysms are developed by syphilis, mycotic change and atherosclerosis. Pulmonary artery aneurysms involve the artery trunk rupture and exanguination if untreated, there has been an emphasis in the need for surgical intervention whenever the diagnosis is made regardless of the presence or absence of symptoms. Here we report a case of patient ductus arterious associated with main pulmonary artery aneurysm in 39 year old female patient with review of literatures.
Adult ; Aneurysm* ; Arteries ; Atherosclerosis ; Diagnosis ; Ductus Arteriosus, Patent* ; Female ; Heart Defects, Congenital ; Humans ; Pulmonary Artery* ; Rupture ; Syphilis

Objective: : Dural substitutes have been widely used in decompressive craniectomy to prevent adhesion, and have significantly reduced blood loss and operation time. However, there are only limited studies providing information regarding detailed techniques and the specific operation time that is associated with good prognoses. In this study, we evaluate the effectiveness of using a dural substitute as an anti-adhesive material during cranioplasty, focusing on technical details and operation time from incision to bone closure. Methods: : A retrospectively reviewed total of 66 patients were included who underwent a craniectomy and subsequent cranioplasty caused by either a severe traumatic brain injury (n=35) or malignant infarction (n=31). The patients were divided into two groups depending on whether Neuro-Patch was used or not (31 in the Neuro-Patch group, 35 in the non-Neuro-Patch group). Propensity score matching was used to minimize the differences. Associated morbidities as well as operation time, and blood loss were analyzed and compared between the two groups. Results: : To prevent adhesion, Neuro-Patch was placed as an onlay, enough to cover the surrounding skull at least 1 cm beyond the bone edges. A small piece was also placed over the temporalis muscle during the craniectomy. A step-by-step dissection was performed to minimize retraction-related injury during the subsequent cranioplasty. The mean estimated blood loss was significantly lower in the Neuro-Patch group (54.6±34.9 vs. 149.0±70.8 mL, p<0.001) and the mean time from incision to bone closure in the Neuro-Patch group was 40.8±14.3 minutes, which was significantly lower than in the non-Neuro-Patch group (91.5±38.2 minutes) as well. For each analysis of complications, the differences were not significant, however, the overall complication rate was significantly lower in the Neuro-Patch group (9.7%) than in the non-Neuro-Patch group (42.9%). Conclusion : Neuro-Patch can be used safely and effectively as an anti-adhesive substitute during cranioplasty. To improve clinical outcomes as well as intraoperative parameters including the time from incision to bone closure, planned placement of Neuro-Patch during craniectomy and the step-by-step dissection during cranioplasty is important.

Objective: : Dural substitutes have been widely used in decompressive craniectomy to prevent adhesion, and have significantly reduced blood loss and operation time. However, there are only limited studies providing information regarding detailed techniques and the specific operation time that is associated with good prognoses. In this study, we evaluate the effectiveness of using a dural substitute as an anti-adhesive material during cranioplasty, focusing on technical details and operation time from incision to bone closure. Methods: : A retrospectively reviewed total of 66 patients were included who underwent a craniectomy and subsequent cranioplasty caused by either a severe traumatic brain injury (n=35) or malignant infarction (n=31). The patients were divided into two groups depending on whether Neuro-Patch was used or not (31 in the Neuro-Patch group, 35 in the non-Neuro-Patch group). Propensity score matching was used to minimize the differences. Associated morbidities as well as operation time, and blood loss were analyzed and compared between the two groups. Results: : To prevent adhesion, Neuro-Patch was placed as an onlay, enough to cover the surrounding skull at least 1 cm beyond the bone edges. A small piece was also placed over the temporalis muscle during the craniectomy. A step-by-step dissection was performed to minimize retraction-related injury during the subsequent cranioplasty. The mean estimated blood loss was significantly lower in the Neuro-Patch group (54.6±34.9 vs. 149.0±70.8 mL, p<0.001) and the mean time from incision to bone closure in the Neuro-Patch group was 40.8±14.3 minutes, which was significantly lower than in the non-Neuro-Patch group (91.5±38.2 minutes) as well. For each analysis of complications, the differences were not significant, however, the overall complication rate was significantly lower in the Neuro-Patch group (9.7%) than in the non-Neuro-Patch group (42.9%). Conclusion : Neuro-Patch can be used safely and effectively as an anti-adhesive substitute during cranioplasty. To improve clinical outcomes as well as intraoperative parameters including the time from incision to bone closure, planned placement of Neuro-Patch during craniectomy and the step-by-step dissection during cranioplasty is important.

Objective: : Dural substitutes have been widely used in decompressive craniectomy to prevent adhesion, and have significantly reduced blood loss and operation time. However, there are only limited studies providing information regarding detailed techniques and the specific operation time that is associated with good prognoses. In this study, we evaluate the effectiveness of using a dural substitute as an anti-adhesive material during cranioplasty, focusing on technical details and operation time from incision to bone closure. Methods: : A retrospectively reviewed total of 66 patients were included who underwent a craniectomy and subsequent cranioplasty caused by either a severe traumatic brain injury (n=35) or malignant infarction (n=31). The patients were divided into two groups depending on whether Neuro-Patch was used or not (31 in the Neuro-Patch group, 35 in the non-Neuro-Patch group). Propensity score matching was used to minimize the differences. Associated morbidities as well as operation time, and blood loss were analyzed and compared between the two groups. Results: : To prevent adhesion, Neuro-Patch was placed as an onlay, enough to cover the surrounding skull at least 1 cm beyond the bone edges. A small piece was also placed over the temporalis muscle during the craniectomy. A step-by-step dissection was performed to minimize retraction-related injury during the subsequent cranioplasty. The mean estimated blood loss was significantly lower in the Neuro-Patch group (54.6±34.9 vs. 149.0±70.8 mL, p<0.001) and the mean time from incision to bone closure in the Neuro-Patch group was 40.8±14.3 minutes, which was significantly lower than in the non-Neuro-Patch group (91.5±38.2 minutes) as well. For each analysis of complications, the differences were not significant, however, the overall complication rate was significantly lower in the Neuro-Patch group (9.7%) than in the non-Neuro-Patch group (42.9%). Conclusion : Neuro-Patch can be used safely and effectively as an anti-adhesive substitute during cranioplasty. To improve clinical outcomes as well as intraoperative parameters including the time from incision to bone closure, planned placement of Neuro-Patch during craniectomy and the step-by-step dissection during cranioplasty is important.

Objective: : Dural substitutes have been widely used in decompressive craniectomy to prevent adhesion, and have significantly reduced blood loss and operation time. However, there are only limited studies providing information regarding detailed techniques and the specific operation time that is associated with good prognoses. In this study, we evaluate the effectiveness of using a dural substitute as an anti-adhesive material during cranioplasty, focusing on technical details and operation time from incision to bone closure. Methods: : A retrospectively reviewed total of 66 patients were included who underwent a craniectomy and subsequent cranioplasty caused by either a severe traumatic brain injury (n=35) or malignant infarction (n=31). The patients were divided into two groups depending on whether Neuro-Patch was used or not (31 in the Neuro-Patch group, 35 in the non-Neuro-Patch group). Propensity score matching was used to minimize the differences. Associated morbidities as well as operation time, and blood loss were analyzed and compared between the two groups. Results: : To prevent adhesion, Neuro-Patch was placed as an onlay, enough to cover the surrounding skull at least 1 cm beyond the bone edges. A small piece was also placed over the temporalis muscle during the craniectomy. A step-by-step dissection was performed to minimize retraction-related injury during the subsequent cranioplasty. The mean estimated blood loss was significantly lower in the Neuro-Patch group (54.6±34.9 vs. 149.0±70.8 mL, p<0.001) and the mean time from incision to bone closure in the Neuro-Patch group was 40.8±14.3 minutes, which was significantly lower than in the non-Neuro-Patch group (91.5±38.2 minutes) as well. For each analysis of complications, the differences were not significant, however, the overall complication rate was significantly lower in the Neuro-Patch group (9.7%) than in the non-Neuro-Patch group (42.9%). Conclusion : Neuro-Patch can be used safely and effectively as an anti-adhesive substitute during cranioplasty. To improve clinical outcomes as well as intraoperative parameters including the time from incision to bone closure, planned placement of Neuro-Patch during craniectomy and the step-by-step dissection during cranioplasty is important.

Minocycline is a semisynthetic tetracycline derivative that is often used in the treatment of acne vulgaris. To date, there has been only one case report of anaphylaxis to minocycline. We report here a case of anaphylaxis to oral minocycline. A 56-yr-old woman visited our hospital after three episodes of recurrent anaphylaxis. We performed an oral challenge test, the standard method for diagnosing drug allergies, with minocycline, one of the drugs she had taken previously. She developed urticaria, angioedema, nausea, vomiting, hypotension, and dyspnea within 4 min and was treated with intramuscular epinephrine, intravenous antihistamine and systemic corticosteroid. However, she presented similar symptoms at 50 min and at 110 min. In prescribing oral minocycline, physicians should consider the possibility of serious adverse reactions, such as anaphylaxis.
Administration, Oral ; Anaphylaxis/chemically induced/*diagnosis ; Anti-Bacterial Agents/*adverse effects ; Drug Hypersensitivity/diagnosis ; Female ; Humans ; Middle Aged ; Minocycline/*adverse effects ; Recurrence