Purpose: We aimed to evaluate the precision of preoperative colonoscopic tattooing and intraoperative colonoscopic tumor localization in determining distal surgical margins for leftsided colorectal cancer surgery. Methods: This retrospective study included 30 patients who underwent laparoscopic colorectal surgery, preoperative colonoscopic tattooing, and intraoperative colonoscopic localization for colorectal cancer at our center between July 2020 and March 2024. Clinical data were collected, and the precision of these methods was assessed by measuring the differences between the target resection margin and the actual pathological resection margin. Results: In four patient cases, the indocyanine green tattoo was not visible in the laparoscopic surgical field. The average stained length of the tattoo was 2.89 cm, with a mean distance of 1.18 cm between the low margin of the tattoo and the cancer. The difference between the target distal resection margin by intraoperative colonoscopic localization and the actual pathological resection margin was 0.88 cm. No complications related to the intraoperative colonoscopy were observed. Conclusion Preoperative tattooing showed limitations, such as spreading and occasional invisibility. Intraoperative colonoscopic localization proved to be an effective method for achieving more precise distal surgical margins in left-sided colorectal cancer surgery.

Purpose: We aimed to evaluate the precision of preoperative colonoscopic tattooing and intraoperative colonoscopic tumor localization in determining distal surgical margins for leftsided colorectal cancer surgery. Methods: This retrospective study included 30 patients who underwent laparoscopic colorectal surgery, preoperative colonoscopic tattooing, and intraoperative colonoscopic localization for colorectal cancer at our center between July 2020 and March 2024. Clinical data were collected, and the precision of these methods was assessed by measuring the differences between the target resection margin and the actual pathological resection margin. Results: In four patient cases, the indocyanine green tattoo was not visible in the laparoscopic surgical field. The average stained length of the tattoo was 2.89 cm, with a mean distance of 1.18 cm between the low margin of the tattoo and the cancer. The difference between the target distal resection margin by intraoperative colonoscopic localization and the actual pathological resection margin was 0.88 cm. No complications related to the intraoperative colonoscopy were observed. Conclusion Preoperative tattooing showed limitations, such as spreading and occasional invisibility. Intraoperative colonoscopic localization proved to be an effective method for achieving more precise distal surgical margins in left-sided colorectal cancer surgery.

Purpose: We aimed to evaluate the precision of preoperative colonoscopic tattooing and intraoperative colonoscopic tumor localization in determining distal surgical margins for leftsided colorectal cancer surgery. Methods: This retrospective study included 30 patients who underwent laparoscopic colorectal surgery, preoperative colonoscopic tattooing, and intraoperative colonoscopic localization for colorectal cancer at our center between July 2020 and March 2024. Clinical data were collected, and the precision of these methods was assessed by measuring the differences between the target resection margin and the actual pathological resection margin. Results: In four patient cases, the indocyanine green tattoo was not visible in the laparoscopic surgical field. The average stained length of the tattoo was 2.89 cm, with a mean distance of 1.18 cm between the low margin of the tattoo and the cancer. The difference between the target distal resection margin by intraoperative colonoscopic localization and the actual pathological resection margin was 0.88 cm. No complications related to the intraoperative colonoscopy were observed. Conclusion Preoperative tattooing showed limitations, such as spreading and occasional invisibility. Intraoperative colonoscopic localization proved to be an effective method for achieving more precise distal surgical margins in left-sided colorectal cancer surgery.

Objective: This study aimed to investigate the closure rate and adverse effects of combination therapy with acetaminophen and ibuprofen for hemodynamically significant patent ductus arteriosus (hsPDA) compared with monotherapy with ibuprofen in extremely preterm infants (EPTs). Methods: This was a single-center, retrospective, and historical control study of infants with hsPDA born at <28 weeks of gestation and a birth weight <1,000 g. Based on the first-line therapeutic policy for hsPDA, the cohort was classified into a monotherapy group (period I: January 2019-July 2021) and a combination therapy group (period II: September 2021-August 2023). Baseline characteristics, treatment outcomes, adverse effects, and morbidities were compared between the groups. Results: Of the 43 EPTs with hsPDA, 26 received monotherapy with ibuprofen during period I, and 17 received combination therapy with acetaminophen and ibuprofen during period II. The successful closure rates after the first medical therapy were 42.3% in the monotherapy group vs. 76.5% in the combination therapy group (P=0.027). No significant difference in adverse effects during medication use was observed between the groups. Conclusion Combination therapy with acetaminophen and ibuprofen improved the closure rate for hsPDA without detectable adverse effects. Combination therapy could be considered the first therapeutic option for hsPDA in EPTs. Further well-designed studies are needed to define the safety and effectiveness of combination therapy.

Objective: This study aimed to investigate the closure rate and adverse effects of combination therapy with acetaminophen and ibuprofen for hemodynamically significant patent ductus arteriosus (hsPDA) compared with monotherapy with ibuprofen in extremely preterm infants (EPTs). Methods: This was a single-center, retrospective, and historical control study of infants with hsPDA born at <28 weeks of gestation and a birth weight <1,000 g. Based on the first-line therapeutic policy for hsPDA, the cohort was classified into a monotherapy group (period I: January 2019-July 2021) and a combination therapy group (period II: September 2021-August 2023). Baseline characteristics, treatment outcomes, adverse effects, and morbidities were compared between the groups. Results: Of the 43 EPTs with hsPDA, 26 received monotherapy with ibuprofen during period I, and 17 received combination therapy with acetaminophen and ibuprofen during period II. The successful closure rates after the first medical therapy were 42.3% in the monotherapy group vs. 76.5% in the combination therapy group (P=0.027). No significant difference in adverse effects during medication use was observed between the groups. Conclusion Combination therapy with acetaminophen and ibuprofen improved the closure rate for hsPDA without detectable adverse effects. Combination therapy could be considered the first therapeutic option for hsPDA in EPTs. Further well-designed studies are needed to define the safety and effectiveness of combination therapy.

Objective: This study aimed to investigate the closure rate and adverse effects of combination therapy with acetaminophen and ibuprofen for hemodynamically significant patent ductus arteriosus (hsPDA) compared with monotherapy with ibuprofen in extremely preterm infants (EPTs). Methods: This was a single-center, retrospective, and historical control study of infants with hsPDA born at <28 weeks of gestation and a birth weight <1,000 g. Based on the first-line therapeutic policy for hsPDA, the cohort was classified into a monotherapy group (period I: January 2019-July 2021) and a combination therapy group (period II: September 2021-August 2023). Baseline characteristics, treatment outcomes, adverse effects, and morbidities were compared between the groups. Results: Of the 43 EPTs with hsPDA, 26 received monotherapy with ibuprofen during period I, and 17 received combination therapy with acetaminophen and ibuprofen during period II. The successful closure rates after the first medical therapy were 42.3% in the monotherapy group vs. 76.5% in the combination therapy group (P=0.027). No significant difference in adverse effects during medication use was observed between the groups. Conclusion Combination therapy with acetaminophen and ibuprofen improved the closure rate for hsPDA without detectable adverse effects. Combination therapy could be considered the first therapeutic option for hsPDA in EPTs. Further well-designed studies are needed to define the safety and effectiveness of combination therapy.

Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the therapeutic role of lymphadenectomy in patients surgically treated for clinically early-stage epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC). Methods: This retrospective, multicenter study included patients with clinically earlystage EOC based on preoperative abdominal-pelvic computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging findings between 2007 and 2021. Oncologic outcomes and perioperative complications were compared between the lymphadenectomy and non-lymphadenectomy groups. Independent prognostic factors were determined using Cox regression analysis.Disease-free survival (DFS) was the primary outcome. Overall survival (OS) and perioperative outcomes were the secondary outcomes. Results: In total, 586 patients (lymphadenectomy group, n=453 [77.3%]; nonlymphadenectomy groups, n=133 [22.7%]) were eligible. After surgical staging, upstaging was identified based on the presence of lymph node metastasis in 14 (3.1%) of 453 patients.No significant difference was found in the 5-year DFS (88.9% vs. 83.4%, p=0.203) and 5-year OS (97.2% vs. 97.7%, p=0.895) between the two groups. Using multivariable analysis, lymphadenectomy was not significantly associated with DFS or OS. However, using subgroup analysis, the lymphadenectomy group with serous histology had higher 5-year DFS rates than did the non-lymphadenectomy group (86.5% vs. 74.4%, p=0.048; adjusted hazard ratio=0.281; 95% confidence interval=0.107–0.735; p=0.010). The lymphadenectomy group had longer operating time (p<0.001), higher estimated blood loss (p<0.001), and higher perioperative complication rate (p=0.004) than did the non-lymphadenectomy group. Conclusion In patients with clinically early-stage EOC with serous histology, lymphadenectomy was associated with survival benefits. Considering its potential harm,

In the 2023 series, we summarized the major clinical research advances in gynecologic oncology based on communications at the conference of Asian Society of Gynecologic Oncology Review Course. The review consisted of 1) Endometrial cancer: immune checkpoint inhibitor, antibody drug conjugates (ADCs), selective inhibitor of nuclear export, CDK4/6 inhibitors WEE1 inhibitor, poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors. 2) Cervical cancer: surgery in low-risk early-stage cervical cancer, therapy for locally advanced stage and advanced, metastatic, or recurrent setting; and 3) Ovarian cancer: immunotherapy, triplet therapies using immune checkpoint inhibitors along with antiangiogenic agents and PARP inhibitors, and ADCs. In 2023, the field of endometrial cancer treatment witnessed a landmark year, marked by several practice-changing outcomes with immune checkpoint inhibitors and the reliable efficacy of PARP inhibitors and ADCs.

Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the therapeutic role of lymphadenectomy in patients surgically treated for clinically early-stage epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC). Methods: This retrospective, multicenter study included patients with clinically earlystage EOC based on preoperative abdominal-pelvic computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging findings between 2007 and 2021. Oncologic outcomes and perioperative complications were compared between the lymphadenectomy and non-lymphadenectomy groups. Independent prognostic factors were determined using Cox regression analysis.Disease-free survival (DFS) was the primary outcome. Overall survival (OS) and perioperative outcomes were the secondary outcomes. Results: In total, 586 patients (lymphadenectomy group, n=453 [77.3%]; nonlymphadenectomy groups, n=133 [22.7%]) were eligible. After surgical staging, upstaging was identified based on the presence of lymph node metastasis in 14 (3.1%) of 453 patients.No significant difference was found in the 5-year DFS (88.9% vs. 83.4%, p=0.203) and 5-year OS (97.2% vs. 97.7%, p=0.895) between the two groups. Using multivariable analysis, lymphadenectomy was not significantly associated with DFS or OS. However, using subgroup analysis, the lymphadenectomy group with serous histology had higher 5-year DFS rates than did the non-lymphadenectomy group (86.5% vs. 74.4%, p=0.048; adjusted hazard ratio=0.281; 95% confidence interval=0.107–0.735; p=0.010). The lymphadenectomy group had longer operating time (p<0.001), higher estimated blood loss (p<0.001), and higher perioperative complication rate (p=0.004) than did the non-lymphadenectomy group. Conclusion In patients with clinically early-stage EOC with serous histology, lymphadenectomy was associated with survival benefits. Considering its potential harm,

In the 2023 series, we summarized the major clinical research advances in gynecologic oncology based on communications at the conference of Asian Society of Gynecologic Oncology Review Course. The review consisted of 1) Endometrial cancer: immune checkpoint inhibitor, antibody drug conjugates (ADCs), selective inhibitor of nuclear export, CDK4/6 inhibitors WEE1 inhibitor, poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors. 2) Cervical cancer: surgery in low-risk early-stage cervical cancer, therapy for locally advanced stage and advanced, metastatic, or recurrent setting; and 3) Ovarian cancer: immunotherapy, triplet therapies using immune checkpoint inhibitors along with antiangiogenic agents and PARP inhibitors, and ADCs. In 2023, the field of endometrial cancer treatment witnessed a landmark year, marked by several practice-changing outcomes with immune checkpoint inhibitors and the reliable efficacy of PARP inhibitors and ADCs.