Cimetidine is a well-tolerated H2-receptor antagonist widely used in the treatment of gastroduodenal diseases and allergic reactions such as urticaria. Numerous adverse reactions have been attributed to cimetidine, which is understandable in view of the attention and scrutiny the drug has received, its widespread use, and its systemic effects. The incidence of general side effects is less than 2%. The drug has caused an array of central nervous system disturbances, gynecomastia, and rarely hepatotoxicity, interstitial nephritis, bradycardia, hypotension, and even cardiac arrest. Cardiovascular side effects are extremely rare and have occurred during rapid intravenous injection. We report a case of anaphylactic shock after rapid intravenous injection of cimetidine.
Anaphylaxis* ; Bradycardia ; Central Nervous System ; Cimetidine* ; Gynecomastia ; Heart Arrest ; Hypersensitivity ; Hypotension ; Incidence ; Injections, Intravenous* ; Male ; Nephritis, Interstitial ; Urticaria

BACKGROUND: In younger children, early diagnosis of acute appendicitis can be difficult because patients may not be able to provide a good history of their symptoms and the etiologies of the abdominal pain is often unclear. Therefore, the diagnosis is may be delayed and may be made after perforation has occurred. METHODS: The cases of 20 children of 3 years of age or less who underwent appendectomies due to appendicitis from January 1995 to March 2000 were retrospectively reviewed. Data were gathered including seasonal variation, gender, mean age, presenting signs and symptoms, physical signs, diagnostic methods, WBC counts, postoperative complications and length of postoperative hospital stay. RESULTS: The male-to-female ratio was 1.5:1. Fifteen cases were diagnosed after perforation had occurred, and 5 cases were nonperforated. The mean age was 29.6(+/-5.5) months; 60% were males(12/20). The most common presenting symptom was abdominal pain(95%). The most common signs was abdominal tenderness; especially, muscle guarding was more common in the perforated group(100% vs. 0%). The mean duration of symptoms prior to visiting the ED and the average length of hospital stay were 4.4 days and 10.1 days in the perforated group and 2.2 days and 4.2 days in the nonperforated group, retrospectively. CONCLUSION: In children of 3 years of age or less, when abdominal pain is persistent without response to conservative treatment and there is associated abdominal tenderness, appendicitis must be considered. especially, when there are fever, diarrhea and muscle guarding, perforated appendicitis must be considered.
Abdominal Pain ; Appendectomy ; Appendicitis* ; Child* ; Diagnosis ; Diarrhea ; Early Diagnosis ; Fever ; Humans ; Length of Stay ; Postoperative Complications ; Retrospective Studies ; Seasons

We have encountered a rare case of symmetrical peripheral gangrene complicating Escherichia coli sepsis in a 47-years-old male. He was successfully treated with antibiotics, anticoagulants, and vasodilator. To our knowledge, this is the first report on symmetrical peripheral gangrene complicating E. coli sepsis in Korea.
Anti-Bacterial Agents ; Anticoagulants ; Escherichia coli* ; Escherichia* ; Gangrene* ; Humans ; Korea ; Male ; Sepsis*

We have encountered a rare case of symmetrical peripheral gangrene complicating Escherichia coli sepsis in a 47-years-old male. He was successfully treated with antibiotics, anticoagulants, and vasodilator. To our knowledge, this is the first report on symmetrical peripheral gangrene complicating E. coli sepsis in Korea.
Anti-Bacterial Agents ; Anticoagulants ; Escherichia coli* ; Escherichia* ; Gangrene* ; Humans ; Korea ; Male ; Sepsis*

Purpose: To determine an appropriate surgical technique, it is important to predict pathological results for patientswith clinically localized prostate cancer (PCa) eligible for nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy (NSRP). Severalstudies have highlighted that serum testosterone level was associated with aggressive features of PCa. Therefore,we analyzed factors, including serum testosterone, to predict upstaging and upgrading after surgery for patientswith clinically localized PCa eligible for NSRP. Materials and Methods: We retrospectively evaluated patients who underwent radical prostatectomy (RP) betweenJanuary 2015 and May 2018 at our institution. Patients with Gleason grade group 1 or 2 on biopsy,prostate-specific antigen<10, and ≤clinical/radiologic stage T2 were included in this study. Upstaging andupgrading were defined as pathological stage≥T3a and Gleason grade group≥3, respectively. We evaluatedthe patients’ demographics and outcomes according to upstaging and upgrading after surgery. Predictive factorsfor upstaging and upgrading were analyzed using a multivariate logistic regression model. Results: Of 108 patients included in the study, upstaging and upgrading after surgery were observed in 24 (22.2%)and 36 (33.3%), respectively. Low serum testosterone level, small prostate size, and positive core number≥3on biopsy were identified as predictive factors for upstaging in multivariate analysis. Although serum testosteronewas associated with upgrading in univariate analysis, only clinical/radiologic stage and biopsy Gleason grade groupwere observed as predictive factors for upgrading in multivariate analysis. Conclusions Serum testosterone level was identified as a predictive factor for upstaging after RP for clinicallylocalized PCa eligible for NSRP.

BACKGROUND: To evaluate mid-term oncological and functional outcomes in patients with prostate cancer treated by robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (RALP) at our institution. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 128 patients with prostate cancer who underwent RALP at our institution between February 2008 and April 2010. All patients enrolled in this study were followed up for at least 5 years. We analyzed biochemical recurrence (BCR)-free survival using a Kaplan-Meier survival curve analysis and predictive factors for BCR using multivariate Cox regression analysis. Continence recovery rate, defined as no use of urinary pads, was also evaluated. RESULTS: Based on the D'Amico risk classification, there were 30 low-risk patients (23.4%), 47 intermediate-risk patients (38.8%), and 51 high-risk patients (39.8%), preoperatively. Based on pathological findings, 50.0% of patients (64/128) showed non-organ confined disease (≥T3a) and 26.6% (34/128) had high grade disease (Gleason score ≥8). During a median follow-up period of 71 months (range, 66–78 months), the frequency of BCR was 33.6% (43/128) and the median BCR-free survival was 65.9 (0.4–88.0) months. Multivariate Cox regression analysis revealed that high grade disease (Gleason score ≥8) was an independent predictor for BCR (hazard ratio=4.180, 95% confidence interval=1.02–17.12, p=0.047). In addition, a majority of patients remained continent following the RALP procedure, without the need for additional intervention for post-prostatectomy incontinence. CONCLUSION Our study demonstrated acceptable outcomes following an initial RALP procedure, despite 50% of the patients investigated demonstrating high-risk features associated with non-organ confined disease.

BACKGROUND: To evaluate mid-term oncological and functional outcomes in patients with prostate cancer treated by robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (RALP) at our institution.METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 128 patients with prostate cancer who underwent RALP at our institution between February 2008 and April 2010. All patients enrolled in this study were followed up for at least 5 years. We analyzed biochemical recurrence (BCR)-free survival using a Kaplan-Meier survival curve analysis and predictive factors for BCR using multivariate Cox regression analysis. Continence recovery rate, defined as no use of urinary pads, was also evaluated.RESULTS: Based on the D'Amico risk classification, there were 30 low-risk patients (23.4%), 47 intermediate-risk patients (38.8%), and 51 high-risk patients (39.8%), preoperatively. Based on pathological findings, 50.0% of patients (64/128) showed non-organ confined disease (≥T3a) and 26.6% (34/128) had high grade disease (Gleason score ≥8). During a median follow-up period of 71 months (range, 66–78 months), the frequency of BCR was 33.6% (43/128) and the median BCR-free survival was 65.9 (0.4–88.0) months. Multivariate Cox regression analysis revealed that high grade disease (Gleason score ≥8) was an independent predictor for BCR (hazard ratio=4.180, 95% confidence interval=1.02–17.12, p=0.047). In addition, a majority of patients remained continent following the RALP procedure, without the need for additional intervention for post-prostatectomy incontinence.CONCLUSION: Our study demonstrated acceptable outcomes following an initial RALP procedure, despite 50% of the patients investigated demonstrating high-risk features associated with non-organ confined disease.
Classification ; Follow-Up Studies ; Humans ; Medical Records ; Prostatectomy ; Prostatic Neoplasms ; Recurrence ; Retrospective Studies ; Urinary Incontinence

"Clinical Practice Guideline for Stroke Rehabilitation in Korea 2012" is a 2nd edition of clinical practice guideline (CPG) for stroke rehabilitation in Korea, which updates the 1st edition published in 2009. After 1st stroke rehabilitation CPG, many studies concerning stroke rehabilitation have been published and the necessity for update has been raised. The Korea Centers for Disease Control and Prevention supported the project "Development of Clinical Practice Guideline for Stroke Rehabilitation" in 2012. Thirty-two specialists in stroke rehabilitation from 18 universities and 3 rehabilitation hospitals and 10 consultants participated in this project. The scope of this CPG included both ischemic and hemorrhagic stroke from the acute to chronic stages. The purpose of this CPG is to provide guidelines for doctors and therapists to make a decision when they manage stroke patients and ultimately, to help stroke patients obtain maximal functional recovery and return to the society. "Clinical Practice Guideline for Stroke Rehabilitation in Korea 2012" consists of 'Chapter 1; Introduction of Stroke Rehabilitation', 'Chapter 2; Rehabilitation for Stroke Syndrome, 'Chapter 3; Rehabilitation for Return to the Society', and 'Chapter 4; Advanced Technique for Stroke Rehabilitation'. Both the adaptation and de novo development methods were used to develop this 2nd edition of CPG. The appraisal of foreign CPGs was performed using 'Korean appraisal of guidelines for research and evaluation II' (K-AGREE II); moreover, four CPGs from Scotland (2010), Austrailia (2010), USA (2010), Canada (2010) were chosen for adaptation. For de novo development, articles that were published following the latest foreign CPGs were searched from the database system, PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane library. Literatures were assessed in the aspect of subjects, study design, study results' consistency, language and application possibility in the Korean society. The chosen articles' level of evidence and grade of recommendation were decided by the criteria of Scotland (2010) and the formal consensus was derived by the nominal group technique. The levels of evidence range from 1++ to 4 and the grades of recommendation range from A to D. GPP (Good Practice Point) was recommended as best practice based on the clinical experience of the guideline developmental group. The draft of the developed CPG was reviewed by the experts group in the public hearings and then revised.
Canada ; Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (U.S.) ; Consensus ; Consultants ; Humans ; Korea* ; Practice Guidelines as Topic ; Rehabilitation* ; Scotland ; Specialization ; Stroke*

“Clinical Practice Guideline for Stroke Rehabilitation in Korea 2016” is the 3rd edition of clinical practice guideline (CPG) for stroke rehabilitation in Korea, which updates the 2nd edition published in 2014. Forty-two specialists in stroke rehabilitation from 21 universities and 4 rehabilitation hospitals and 4 consultants participated in this update. The purpose of this CPG is to provide optimum practical guidelines for stroke rehabilitation teams to make a decision when they manage stroke patients and ultimately, to help stroke patients obtain maximal functional recovery and return to the society. The recent two CPGs from Canada (2015) and USA (2016) and articles that were published following the 2nd edition were used to develop this 3rd edition of CPG for stroke rehabilitation in Korea. The chosen articles' level of evidence and grade of recommendation were decided by the criteria of Scotland (2010) and the formal consensus was derived by the nominal group technique. The levels of evidence range from 1++ to 4 and the grades of recommendation range from A to D. Good Practice Point was recommended as best practice based on the clinical experience of the guideline developmental group. The draft of the developed CPG was reviewed by the experts group in the public hearings and then revised. “Clinical Practice Guideline for Stroke Rehabilitation in Korea 2016” consists of ‘Chapter 1; Introduction of Stroke Rehabilitation’, ‘Chapter 2; Rehabilitation for Stroke Syndrome, ‘Chapter 3; Rehabilitation for Returning to the Society’, and ‘Chapter 4; Advanced Technique for Stroke Rehabilitation’. “Clinical Practice Guideline for Stroke Rehabilitation in Korea 2016” will provide direction and standardization for acute, subacute and chronic stroke rehabilitation in Korea.
Canada ; Consensus ; Consultants ; Humans ; Korea* ; Practice Guidelines as Topic ; Rehabilitation* ; Scotland ; Specialization ; Stroke*