INTRODUCTIONMedical education is trending towards an outcome-based curriculum that prepares medical graduates to excel in a rapidly evolving, team-centred healthcare delivery system. The Mayo Medical School (MMS) has recently redesigned its curriculum to introduce early clinical relevance, optimise course integration, provide flexibility and promote active learning. This study aims to evaluate the role that curricular flexibility plays in students' perceived learning, satisfaction and performance.

MATERIALS AND METHODSFirst-year students completed a 5-point Likert scale survey regarding satisfaction with and perceived learning from various components of the flexible curriculum during 2 different academic blocks. Students' academic performance was assessed by a National Board of Medical Examiners (NBME) Subject Examination after each block.

RESULTSIn comparing student-rated satisfaction and perceived learning from didactics versus other curricular components for Block 3 (Pathology and Immunology) and Block 5 (Gross Anatomy and Radiology), students rated didactics higher in all cases in which there was a statistically significant difference in the ratings. There was a statistically significant positive correlation between the amount learned and satisfaction for all curricular components with the exception of Block 5 independent study. During Block 3, only interest in the subject matter correlated positively with the NBME score, while during Block 5, only time spent in class correlated negatively with the NBME score.

CONCLUSIONSAlthough various components of the flexible curriculum do not appear to affect satisfaction and perceived learning, their potential influence on graduate outcomes, in terms of delivering healthcare providers who are patient-centred, creative thinkers and compassionate leaders should not be discounted.

Curriculum ; trends ; Education, Medical ; methods ; Educational Measurement ; Humans ; Personal Satisfaction ; Students, Medical ; psychology ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; United States

INTRODUCTIONToday's physicians must demonstrate both professionalism and leadership skills in order to succeed in largely team-based healthcare environments. The purpose of this study was to determine if professionalism attributes, leadership style, and leadership style adaptability are associated with academic performance among first-year students early in their medical curriculum.

MATERIALS AND METHODSStudents were divided into 4-member dissection groups for the duration of the Gross and Developmental Anatomy course. Leadership responsibility was randomly assigned to a team member on a rotating basis every 5 weeks. After each 5-week block, student performance was measured by written and practical examinations, and each student assessed their leader's or their own professionalism attributes and leadership style using validated survey instruments.

RESULTSMost students demonstrated either a "selling" only (57%) or "participating" only (30%) leadership style with low to moderate leadership adaptability. "Participating" and "delegating" leadership styles have the highest average group written exam scores (89.4%, P <0.008). "Telling" only or "selling" only leaders have the lowest average group exam scores (83.5%, P <0.001). "Selling" and "participating" leaders have significantly lower average group practical exam scores than other styles (81.5%, P <0.007). Positive associations were observed between the written and practical examination scores and the leader's integrity (P = 0.003, P = 0.002) and responsibility (P <0.001, P = 0.037).

CONCLUSIONSThis study demonstrates that various situational leadership styles and aspects of professionalism are associated with written and practical examination scores in the Gross and Developmental Anatomy course. Furthermore, it demonstrates that first-year medical students are in need of leadership skill development.

Anatomy, Cross-Sectional ; education ; Curriculum ; standards ; Education, Medical ; methods ; standards ; Female ; Humans ; Leadership ; Male ; Practice Patterns, Physicians' ; Retrospective Studies ; Students, Medical

INTRODUCTIONChanges in worldwide healthcare delivery require review of current medical school curricula structure to develop learning outcomes that ensures mastery of knowledge and clinical competency. In the last 3 years, Mayo Medical School implemented outcomes-based curriculum to encompass new graduate outcomes.

MATERIALS AND METHODSStandard courses were replaced by 6-week clinically-integrated didactic blocks separated by student-self selected academic enrichment activities. Gross and microscopic anatomy was integrated with radiology and genetics respectively. Laboratory components include virtual microscopy and anatomical dissection. Students assigned to teams utilise computer portals to share learning experiences. High-resolution computed tomographic (CT) scans of cadavers prior to dissection were made available for correlative learning between the cadaveric material and radiologic images.

RESULTSStudents work in teams on assigned presentations that include histology, cell and molecular biology, genetics and genomic using the Nexus Portal, based on DrupalEd, to share their observations, reflections and dissection findings.

CONCLUSIONSNew generation of medical students are clearly comfortable utilising web-based programmes that maximise their learning potential of conceptually difficult and labor intensive courses. Team-based learning approach emphasising the use of knowledge-sharing computer portals maximises opportunities for students to master their knowledge and improve cognitive skills to ensure clinical competency.

Anatomy ; education ; Clinical Competence ; Education, Medical, Undergraduate ; methods ; Humans ; Internet ; Microscopy ; Problem-Based Learning