INTRODUCTIONMyopes are suspected to be poorer at responding to accommodative stimuli than emmetropes, and this may worsen the degree of their myopia. The study aims to compare the abilities of young adult emmetropes and myopes in responding to accommodative stimuli, as indicated by their Accommodation Stimulus Response Curves (ASRCs) in a predominantly Chinese population.

MATERIALS AND METHODSSeventeen emmetropes and 33 myopes aged between 16 and 23 years (mean, 18.6 +/- 1.2) were recruited, of whom 11 were progressing and 22 were non-progressing myopes. The ASRC gradients of subjects were measured using the methods of decreasing distance series (DDS), positive (PLS) and negative lens series (NLS).

RESULTSThe ASRC is method dependent. The gradients of the curves are significantly different among 3 methods of measurement using single-factor ANOVA (F3.057 = 44.815, P <0.01). The slopes of the accommodative errors of all subjects were steeper using the NLS method, and the lags of accommodation increased with elevated demands. No significant differences in ASRC gradients were found between emmetropes, non-progressing myopes and progressing myopes for the range of accommodative demands for each method. Progressing myopes showed the highest error towards the higher demand compared with the emmetropes and non-progressing myopes.

CONCLUSIONAccommodative responses of myopes were more sluggish though there were no statistical differences in ASRC gradients between emmetropes and myopes. It is not certain if the poorer accommodative responses were a cause, or a consequence, of myopia.

Accommodation, Ocular ; Adolescent ; Adult ; Disease Progression ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Myopia ; physiopathology ; Refraction, Ocular

INTRODUCTIONThe aim of the study was to compare the visual performance of LASIK eyes measured using high-contrast logMAR letter charts under bright (photopic) and dim (mesopic) conditions.

MATERIALS AND METHODSA total of 46 subjects (35 +/- 8 years of age) undergoing LASIK procedures were recruited for the study. The best spectacle-corrected visual acuity (BSCVA) of each subject was measured using the high-contrast ETDRS logMAR chart under photopic and mesopic conditions at 3 visits: preoperative (Pre), 1 month postoperative (Post1) and 3 months postoperative (Post3). The differences in logMAR scores for the right eyes only were analysed for the Pre-Post1 (n = 46), Pre-Post3 (n = 18) and Post1-Post3 (n = 16) comparisons.

RESULTSThe logMAR scores of subjects were worse at the 1-month postoperative visit than preoperatively, and improvement in visual performance was seen at the 3-month postoperative visit. These changes in visual performance became more evident under mesopic conditions. The means and standard errors of the differences in logMAR scores for the Pre-Post3 (0.097 +/- 0.020) were slightly larger than those of the Pre-Post1 (-0.067 +/- 0.019) and Post1-Post3 (0.031 +/- 0.012) comparisons. Under mesopic conditions, the visual performance of the subjects was statistically significant for the 3 comparisons, but not under photopic conditions.

CONCLUSIONHigh-contrast logMAR chart performed under mesopic conditions has the potential to replace visual acuity measured under photopic conditions in providing more reliable representation of postoperative visual outcomes of LASIK eyes. Eye doctors should consider performing this vision test routinely to gauge the success of LASIK surgery.

Adult ; Contrast Sensitivity ; Female ; Humans ; Keratomileusis, Laser In Situ ; adverse effects ; Lighting ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Reproducibility of Results ; Vision Disorders ; diagnosis ; etiology ; Vision Tests ; methods ; Visual Acuity