Background and Objectives: Among various emerging catheter-based treatments for severe tricuspid regurgitation (TR), the spacer device can reduce the regurgitation orifice without manipulating the valve leaflet. However, its clinical application has been hampered by traumatic anchoring to the myocardium and the coaxial alignment of the balloon resulting in insufficient TR reduction. This study aimed to evaluate the early-stage safety, technical feasibility, and preliminary efficacy of the novel atraumatic vertical spacer in patients with isolated severe TR. Methods: All procedures were guided by fluoroscopy and transthoracic echocardiography.The maximum device placement time with an inflated balloon was 24 hours. Changes in the amount of TR, right ventricular function, and patient hemodynamics were measured during balloon deployment. Results: A total of 7 patients (median age 74), underwent successful device implantation without procedure-related complications. During balloon inflation (median 25 minutes), there were no symptoms or signs indicative of TR intolerance. TR was reduced by 1 grade or greater in all patients, with 2 patients exhibiting a reduction of 3 grades, from torrential TR to a moderate degree. Mild TR after balloon inflation was achieved in 3 patients with baseline severe TR. The TR reduction observed during initial balloon deployment was sustained during the subsequent balloon maintenance period. Conclusions The Pivot-balloon procedure was safe, technically feasible, and effective in reducing TR in patients with severe TR. No periprocedural complications or adverse cardiovascular events were reported during device placement with TR reduction observed in all patients. However, longer-term follow-up is needed to confirm safety and treatment effect.

Background and Objectives: Among various emerging catheter-based treatments for severe tricuspid regurgitation (TR), the spacer device can reduce the regurgitation orifice without manipulating the valve leaflet. However, its clinical application has been hampered by traumatic anchoring to the myocardium and the coaxial alignment of the balloon resulting in insufficient TR reduction. This study aimed to evaluate the early-stage safety, technical feasibility, and preliminary efficacy of the novel atraumatic vertical spacer in patients with isolated severe TR. Methods: All procedures were guided by fluoroscopy and transthoracic echocardiography.The maximum device placement time with an inflated balloon was 24 hours. Changes in the amount of TR, right ventricular function, and patient hemodynamics were measured during balloon deployment. Results: A total of 7 patients (median age 74), underwent successful device implantation without procedure-related complications. During balloon inflation (median 25 minutes), there were no symptoms or signs indicative of TR intolerance. TR was reduced by 1 grade or greater in all patients, with 2 patients exhibiting a reduction of 3 grades, from torrential TR to a moderate degree. Mild TR after balloon inflation was achieved in 3 patients with baseline severe TR. The TR reduction observed during initial balloon deployment was sustained during the subsequent balloon maintenance period. Conclusions The Pivot-balloon procedure was safe, technically feasible, and effective in reducing TR in patients with severe TR. No periprocedural complications or adverse cardiovascular events were reported during device placement with TR reduction observed in all patients. However, longer-term follow-up is needed to confirm safety and treatment effect.

Background and Objectives: Among various emerging catheter-based treatments for severe tricuspid regurgitation (TR), the spacer device can reduce the regurgitation orifice without manipulating the valve leaflet. However, its clinical application has been hampered by traumatic anchoring to the myocardium and the coaxial alignment of the balloon resulting in insufficient TR reduction. This study aimed to evaluate the early-stage safety, technical feasibility, and preliminary efficacy of the novel atraumatic vertical spacer in patients with isolated severe TR. Methods: All procedures were guided by fluoroscopy and transthoracic echocardiography.The maximum device placement time with an inflated balloon was 24 hours. Changes in the amount of TR, right ventricular function, and patient hemodynamics were measured during balloon deployment. Results: A total of 7 patients (median age 74), underwent successful device implantation without procedure-related complications. During balloon inflation (median 25 minutes), there were no symptoms or signs indicative of TR intolerance. TR was reduced by 1 grade or greater in all patients, with 2 patients exhibiting a reduction of 3 grades, from torrential TR to a moderate degree. Mild TR after balloon inflation was achieved in 3 patients with baseline severe TR. The TR reduction observed during initial balloon deployment was sustained during the subsequent balloon maintenance period. Conclusions The Pivot-balloon procedure was safe, technically feasible, and effective in reducing TR in patients with severe TR. No periprocedural complications or adverse cardiovascular events were reported during device placement with TR reduction observed in all patients. However, longer-term follow-up is needed to confirm safety and treatment effect.

Background and Objectives: Among various emerging catheter-based treatments for severe tricuspid regurgitation (TR), the spacer device can reduce the regurgitation orifice without manipulating the valve leaflet. However, its clinical application has been hampered by traumatic anchoring to the myocardium and the coaxial alignment of the balloon resulting in insufficient TR reduction. This study aimed to evaluate the early-stage safety, technical feasibility, and preliminary efficacy of the novel atraumatic vertical spacer in patients with isolated severe TR. Methods: All procedures were guided by fluoroscopy and transthoracic echocardiography.The maximum device placement time with an inflated balloon was 24 hours. Changes in the amount of TR, right ventricular function, and patient hemodynamics were measured during balloon deployment. Results: A total of 7 patients (median age 74), underwent successful device implantation without procedure-related complications. During balloon inflation (median 25 minutes), there were no symptoms or signs indicative of TR intolerance. TR was reduced by 1 grade or greater in all patients, with 2 patients exhibiting a reduction of 3 grades, from torrential TR to a moderate degree. Mild TR after balloon inflation was achieved in 3 patients with baseline severe TR. The TR reduction observed during initial balloon deployment was sustained during the subsequent balloon maintenance period. Conclusions The Pivot-balloon procedure was safe, technically feasible, and effective in reducing TR in patients with severe TR. No periprocedural complications or adverse cardiovascular events were reported during device placement with TR reduction observed in all patients. However, longer-term follow-up is needed to confirm safety and treatment effect.

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the fracture strength of zirconia crowns of varying margin thicknesses. Materials and Methods: A model of the maxillary right first molar (Nissin, Kyoto, Japan) was prepared to create an abutment, which was fabricated into a metal die via a 3D metal printer. CAD software (exocad GmbH, Darmstadt, Germany) was used to design the crowns. A total of eight groups were generated: initially separated by margin thickness (0.1 mm and 0.8 mm), and then further divided by horizontal margin widths of 0.1 mm, 0.2 mm, 0.3 mm, and 0.4 mm. Zirconia crowns were designed for each group’s working models (N=10). Crown fracture strength was assessed using a universal testing machine (Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan), applying a compressive load until fracture and recording the maximum load. A scanning electron microscope was employed to observe fracture patterns. Fracture strength results were analyzed using one-way ANOVA, with the Tukey HSD test applied for post-hoc analysis (α=0.05). Results: Zirconia crown fracture strength significantly improved with increased horizontal margin width (P<0.001). However, margin thickness had no statistically significant effect on fracture strength (P=0.513). Conclusion Optimizing the horizontal margin width of zirconia crowns enhances their durability and performance.

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the fracture strength of zirconia crowns of varying margin thicknesses. Materials and Methods: A model of the maxillary right first molar (Nissin, Kyoto, Japan) was prepared to create an abutment, which was fabricated into a metal die via a 3D metal printer. CAD software (exocad GmbH, Darmstadt, Germany) was used to design the crowns. A total of eight groups were generated: initially separated by margin thickness (0.1 mm and 0.8 mm), and then further divided by horizontal margin widths of 0.1 mm, 0.2 mm, 0.3 mm, and 0.4 mm. Zirconia crowns were designed for each group’s working models (N=10). Crown fracture strength was assessed using a universal testing machine (Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan), applying a compressive load until fracture and recording the maximum load. A scanning electron microscope was employed to observe fracture patterns. Fracture strength results were analyzed using one-way ANOVA, with the Tukey HSD test applied for post-hoc analysis (α=0.05). Results: Zirconia crown fracture strength significantly improved with increased horizontal margin width (P<0.001). However, margin thickness had no statistically significant effect on fracture strength (P=0.513). Conclusion Optimizing the horizontal margin width of zirconia crowns enhances their durability and performance.

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the fracture strength of zirconia crowns of varying margin thicknesses. Materials and Methods: A model of the maxillary right first molar (Nissin, Kyoto, Japan) was prepared to create an abutment, which was fabricated into a metal die via a 3D metal printer. CAD software (exocad GmbH, Darmstadt, Germany) was used to design the crowns. A total of eight groups were generated: initially separated by margin thickness (0.1 mm and 0.8 mm), and then further divided by horizontal margin widths of 0.1 mm, 0.2 mm, 0.3 mm, and 0.4 mm. Zirconia crowns were designed for each group’s working models (N=10). Crown fracture strength was assessed using a universal testing machine (Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan), applying a compressive load until fracture and recording the maximum load. A scanning electron microscope was employed to observe fracture patterns. Fracture strength results were analyzed using one-way ANOVA, with the Tukey HSD test applied for post-hoc analysis (α=0.05). Results: Zirconia crown fracture strength significantly improved with increased horizontal margin width (P<0.001). However, margin thickness had no statistically significant effect on fracture strength (P=0.513). Conclusion Optimizing the horizontal margin width of zirconia crowns enhances their durability and performance.

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the fracture strength of zirconia crowns of varying margin thicknesses. Materials and Methods: A model of the maxillary right first molar (Nissin, Kyoto, Japan) was prepared to create an abutment, which was fabricated into a metal die via a 3D metal printer. CAD software (exocad GmbH, Darmstadt, Germany) was used to design the crowns. A total of eight groups were generated: initially separated by margin thickness (0.1 mm and 0.8 mm), and then further divided by horizontal margin widths of 0.1 mm, 0.2 mm, 0.3 mm, and 0.4 mm. Zirconia crowns were designed for each group’s working models (N=10). Crown fracture strength was assessed using a universal testing machine (Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan), applying a compressive load until fracture and recording the maximum load. A scanning electron microscope was employed to observe fracture patterns. Fracture strength results were analyzed using one-way ANOVA, with the Tukey HSD test applied for post-hoc analysis (α=0.05). Results: Zirconia crown fracture strength significantly improved with increased horizontal margin width (P<0.001). However, margin thickness had no statistically significant effect on fracture strength (P=0.513). Conclusion Optimizing the horizontal margin width of zirconia crowns enhances their durability and performance.

Objectives: Genetic factors are a major cause of osteoporosis. The present study evaluated the association of the apolipoprotein E (ApoE) genotype with bone mineral density (BMD) and its response to menopausal hormone therapy (MHT) in postmenopausal Korean women. Methods: This retrospective cohort study included 172 postmenopausal women with no endocrine diseases, medications, or lifestyles that would affect bone metabolism and who were continuously treated with MHT for at least 2 years. BMDs were measured at baseline and periodically. Results: Linear regression analysis demonstrated similar baseline BMDs at the lumbar spine, but significantly lower at the femur neck and total hip in the ApoE ε4 carrier than in the noncarrier group, after controlling for age, body mass index, and history of MHT usage. Overall, the Wilcoxon signed rank test demonstrated that MHT increased the BMD percentage change at all three regions, and the Generalized Estimating Equation (GEE) demonstrated significant time trends at the lumbar spine and femur neck. ApoE ε4 noncarriers exhibited a significant time trend in BMD changes at the femur neck, whereas ε4 carriers exhibited a time trend at the lumbar spine. However, BMD changes at each time point were comparable at all regions between the groups. Notably, GEE adjusted for baseline characteristics and BMD revealed a significant interaction effect of time and ApoE ε4 allele in BMD changes at the femur neck. Conclusions Postmenopausal Korean women carrying the ApoE ε4 allele demonstrated a lower hip BMD compared with ε4 noncarriers. Furthermore, the ε4 allele may modulate hip BMD responses to MHT.

Background/Aims: We evaluated nailfold capillaroscopy (NFC) of interstitial pneumonia with autoimmune features (IPAF) and compared it with that of patients with connective tissue disease-interstitial lung disease (CTD-ILD) and idiopathic interstitial pneumonia (IIP). Methods: Patients with newly diagnosed as ILD were evaluated using NFC. Baseline demographic, clinical, serological, and high-resolution CT findings were collected. NFC was semi-quantitatively scored with six domains ranging from 0 to 18. In addition, the overall patterns (sclerodermaon-scleroderma patterns) were determined. Results: A total of 81 patients (31 with CTD-ILD, 18 with IPAF, and 32 with IIP) were included. The non-specific interstitial pneumonia pattern was the most common ILD pattern in the CTD-ILD and IPAF groups, whereas the usual interstitial pneumonia pattern was the most common in the IIP group. The semi-quantitative score of the CTD-ILD group was higher than that of the IPAF or IIP groups (5.8 vs 4.2 vs 3.0, p < 0.001, respectively). Giant capillaries and haemorrhages were more frequently present in the CTD-ILD and IPAF groups than in the IIP group. A scleroderma pattern was present in 27.8% of the IPAF group, whereas none of the IIP patients showed a scleroderma pattern. Conclusions NFC findings may be useful in classifying patients with ILD into CTD-ILD/IPAF/IIP.