[Objective] To explore the relationship between neutrophil activation under cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) and the incidence of cardiac surgery-associated acute kidney injury (CS-AKI). [Methods] This prospective cohort study enrolled adult patients who scheduled for cardiac surgery under CPB at West China Hospital between May 1, 2022 and March 31, 2023. The primary outcome was acute kidney injury (AKI). Blood samples (5 mL) were obtained from the central vein before surgery, at rewarming, at the end of CPB, and 24 hours after surgery. Neutrophils were labeled with CD11b, CD54 and other markers. To assess the effect of neutrophils activation on AKI, propensity score matching (PSM) was employed to equilibrate covariates between the groups. [Results] A total of 120 patients included into the study, and 17 (14.2%) developed AKI. Both CD11b⁺ and CD54⁺ neutrophils significantly increased during the rewarming phase and the increases were kept until 24 hours after surgery. During rewarming, the numbers of CD11b⁺ neutrophils were significantly higher in AKI compared to non-AKI (4.71×10⁹/L vs 3.31×10⁹/L, Z=-2.14, P<0.05). Similarly, the CD54⁺ neutrophils counts were also significantly higher in AKI than in non-AKI before surgery (2.75×10⁹/L vs 1.79×10⁹/L, Z=-2.99, P<0.05), during rewarming (3.12×10⁹/L vs 1.62×10⁹/L, Z=-4.34, P<0.05), and at the end of CPB (4.28×10⁹/L vs 2.14×10⁹/L, Z=-3.91, P<0.05). An analysis of 32 matched patients (16 in each group) revealed that CD11b⁺ and CD54⁺ neutrophil levels of AKI were 1.74 folds (4.83×10⁹/L vs 2.77×10⁹/L, Z=-2.72, P<0.05) and 2.34 folds (3.32×10⁹/L vs 1.42×10⁹/L, Z=-4.12, P<0.05), respectively, of non-AKI at rewarming phase. [Conclusion] Neutrophils are activated during CPB, and they can be identified by CD11b/CD54 markers. The activated neutrophils of AKI patients are approximately 2 folds of non-AKI during the rewarming phase, with disparity reached peak between groups during rewarming. These findings suggest the removal of 50% of activated neutrophils during the rewarming phase may be effective to reduce the risk of AKI.

Objective:To investigate the factors that affect the therapeutic effects of endoscopic radiofrequency ablation (Stretta procedure) on gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD).Methods:Seventy patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease who received endoscopic radiofrequency ablation (Stretta procedure) treatment in Jinhua Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine from January 2016 to January 2019 were included in this study. They were divided into good prognosis group ( n = 57) and poor prognosis group ( n = 13) according to prognostic effects. The clinical data of all patients were collected, including gender, age, body mass index (BMI), course of disease, complications (hypertension, coronary heart disease, diabetes), smoking, drinking, Hamilton Depression Scale (HAMD) and Hamilton Anxiety Scale (HAMA) scores. Unconditional stepwise logistic regression was performed to analyze the factors that affect the therapeutic effects of Stretta procedure on GERD. Results:Univariate analysis results revealed that the proportion of patients aged ≥ 60 years with BMI ≥ 25 kg/m 2, alcohol abuse, HAMD score ≥ 8, HAMD score ≥ 7 was significantly higher in the poor prognosis group than in the good prognosis group ( χ2 = 9.574, 10.821, 22.575, 8.653, 10.586, 4.070, 8.653, all P < 0.05). Logistic regression analysis confirmed that female gender, age ≥ 60 years, BMI ≥ 25 kg/m 2, course of disease ≥ 5 years, alcohol abuse, HAMD score ≥ 8 and HAMA score ≥ 7 were the risk factors for poor prognosis of gastroesophageal reflux disease ( χ2 = 11.174, 6.023, 8.698, 5.972, 5.821, 7.485, 5.443, all P < 0.05). Consistency analysis revealed that gender, age, BMI, course of disease, alcohol abuse, HAMD score and HAMA score could be used to predict the therapeutic effects of endoscopic radiofrequency ablation (Stretta procedure) on GERD. Combined application of gender, age, BMI, course of disease, alcohol abuse, HAMD score and HAMA score exhibited higher consistency than a single application, 0.827 > 0.577, 0.533, 0.795, 0.547, 0.606, 0.434 and 0.547. Conclusion:There are many factors that affect the therapeutic effects of endoscopic radiofrequency ablation (Stretta procedure) on GERD, including gender, age, BMI, course of disease, alcohol abuse, HAMD score and HAMA score. This is of certain reference value for clinical treatment of GERD, and combined application of these influential factors has a high accuracy in the prediction of the therapeutic effects of Stretta procedure on GERD.

Objective: To evaluate the endothelial function in obstructive sleep apnea syndrome(OSAS) children and to identify related factors of endothelial dysfunction. Methods: This was a cross-sectional study. Children with habitual snoring (snoring ≥3 nights per week) admitted to the ward of otolaryngology, head and neck surgery, Beijing Children′s Hospital were recruited to this study between 1^st June 2015 and 1^st March 2016. All children aged 3 to 11 years and of them 245 were boys and 110 were girls. All subjects underwent an overnight polysomnography (PSG), as well as endothelial function testing. All subjects were grouped into primary snoring (PS) and OSAS group according to the obstructive apnea hypopnea index (OAHI). T test or Wilcoxon test were used to compare the differences in PSG results between the two groups, and univariate and multivariate correlation analyses were used to explore the relevant factors affecting the endothelial function. Results: A total of 355 subjects were enrolled and 248 had OSAS, and 107 had PS. There were no significant differences in age, gender and body mass index (BMI) Z-score between the two groups (all P>0.05). OSAS group had higher OAHI, oxgen desaturation index and respiratory related arousal index (5.2 (2.2, 13.2) vs. 0.4 (0.1, 0.7), 4.1 (2.0, 13.1) vs. 0.5 (0.1, 1.0), 2.5 (1.0, 4.8) vs. 0.4 (0.1, 0.9), Z=-14.957, -11.790, -10.378, all P<0.01), and lower minimum oxygen saturation and reactive hyperemia index (RHI) than those of PS (0.89 (0.85, 0.92) vs. 0.94 (0.91, 0.95), 1.2±0.2 vs. 1.1±0.1, Z=-9.337, t=5.354, P<0.01). Univariate regression analysis showed that RHI was linearly correlated with age (parameter estimate=0.017, P<0.01), gender (parameter estimate=0.065, P<0.01), OAHI (parameter estimate=-0.023, P<0.01), oxygen desaturation index (parameter estimate=-0.019, P<0.01), respiratory related arousal index (parameter estimate=-0.031, P<0.01), and oxygen saturation nadir (parameter estimate=0.067, P=0.045). The relationship between BMI Z-score and RHI was quadratic. Multivariate regression analysis showed that age (parameter estimate=0.015, P<0.01), BMI Z-score (parameter estimate=0.040, P<0.01), BMI Z-score quadratic form (parameter estimate=-0.010, P<0.01), respiratory related arousal index (parameter estimate=-0.020, P<0.01) were independently correlated with RHI. Conclusions Children with OSAS have significant endothelial dysfunction compared with PS. Frequent arousals due to obstructive respiratory events during sleep may be a candidate risk factor for endothelial dysfunction in children with OSAS.

Objective:To compare the efficacy between laparoscopy and open surgery for gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) larger than 2 cm.Methods:A multicenter retrospective cohort study was performed. Inclusion criteria: long diameter of primary gastric GIST > 2 cm; undergoing laparoscopy or open surgery; diagnosis confirmed by postoperative pathology without distant metastasis; without preoperative targeted therapy. Clinicopathological data of 857 gastric GIST patients, including 320 in PLA General Hospital, 284 in Shanghai Renji Hospital, 175 in Wuhan Union Hospital and 78 in Tianjin Cancer Hospital, from January 2010 to May 2017 were retrospectively collected. There were 418 males and 439 females, mainly aged between 50 and 70 years old. Among 857 patients, 413 were in the laparoscopy group and 444 in the open group. The nearest neighbor matching of propensity score matching method was conducted with 1:1 matching based on tumor location and size between laparoscopy and open group to obtain samples of covariate equilibrium, and the caliper value was 0.04. The t test, χ 2 test and Wilcoxon rank test were used to compare short-term efficacy, and the Kaplan-Meier curve and log rank test were applied to compare long-term outcomes between the two groups. Results:After propensity score matching, laparoscopy group and open group both enrolled 293 cases. The baseline data, including age, gender, tumor location, tumor long diameter, NIH classification, etc. were not significantly different between the two groups (all P>0.05). Compared with the open group, the laparoscopy group had less intraoperative blood loss [<100 ml: 2.9% (155/293) vs. 36.2% (106/293), Z=-12.857, P<0.001], shorter time to postoperative feeding [(4.0±0.2) days vs. (5.3±0.9) days, t=1.505, P=0.003] and to the removal of drainage tube [(4.8±1.0) days vs. (6.5±1.0) days, t=1.847, P=0.008], and shorter postoperative hospital stay [(8.6±0.3) days vs. (10.5±0.3) days, t=4.235, P<0.001]. Subgroups analysis according to anatomical location: (1) Gastric cardia and pylorus: there were no statistically significant differences in perioperative parameters between the two groups (all P>0.05). (2) Stomach base: feeding time after surgery [(4.0±0.2) days vs. (4.5±0.2) days, t=0.512, P=0.038], drainage tube removal time [(5.1±0.4) days vs. (6.4±0.6) days, t=0.517, P=0.044], postoperative hospital stay [(8.0±0.5) days vs. (11.1±0.9) days, t=0.500, P=0.002] were all significantly shorter in the laparoscopy group as compared to the open group, while the differences in other perioperative parameters were not statistically significant (all P>0.05). (3) Lesser curvature of the stomach: the laparoscopy group had less intraoperative blood loss [<100 ml ratio: 58.1% (43/74) vs. 33.7% (25/74), Z=7.632, P=0.034], shorter gastric tube removal time [(2.7±0.2) days vs. (3.2±0.3) days, t=0.503, P=0.007], earlier postoperative passage of gas [(2.8±0.1) days vs. (3.4±0.2) days, t=0.532, P=0.030], earlier postoperative feeding [(3.6±0.2) days vs. (4.3±0.2) days, t=0.508, P=0.020], shorter drainage tube removal time [(4.2±0.4) days vs. (5.7±0.5) days, t=0.508, P=0.020] and postoperative hospital stay [(8.3±0.6) days vs. (10.7±0.3) days, t=0.502, P=0.006] as compared to the open group. (4) Great curvature of the stomach: the laparoscopy group presented less intraoperative blood loss [<100 ml ratio: 52.7% (39/74) vs. 36.5% (27/74), Z=7.681, P=0.032], earlier gastric tube removal [(2.6±0.2) days vs. (3.6±0.2) days, t=0.501, P=0.001], earlier postoperative passage of gas [(2.7±0.2) days vs. (3.4±0.2) days, t=0.501, P=0.016], earlier postoperative feeding [(3.6±0.2) days vs. (4.7±0.2) days, t=0.500, P=0.001], shorter drainage tube removal time [(4.0±0.5) days to (5.9±0.4) days, t=0.508, P=0.002] and postoperative hospital stay [(7.5±0.3) days to (9.5±0.1) days, t=0.500, P=0.001] than the open group. Subgroup analysis according to tumor size: (1) Tumor long diameter 2.0-5.0 cm: the laparoscopy group had earlier passage of gas [(2.9±0.1) days vs. (3.5±0.1) days, t=0.500, P=0.001], earlier postoperative feeding [(4.5±0.1) days vs. (5.0±0.2) days, t=0.501, P=0.013], shorter drainage tube removal time [(4.8±0.3) days vs. (6.0±0.3) days, t=0.511, P=0.008] and postoperative hospital stay [(8.1±0.4) days to (10.1±0.3) days, t=0.513, P=0.001] than the open group. (2) Tumor long diameter 5.1-10.0 cm: in the laparoscopic group, postoperative feeding time [(4.0±0.2) days vs. (4.7±0.2) days, t=0.506, P=0.015], drainage tube removal time [(4.6±0.4) days vs. (6.4±0.5)) days, t=0.501, P=0.004], postoperative hospital stay [(8.2±0.3) days vs. (10.9±0.6) days, t=0.500, P=0.001] were all shorter than those in the open group. No intraoperative and postoperative complications were observed in each group. The 5-year recurrence-free survival rates of the laparoscopy group and the open group were 95.4% and 91.6%, respectively ( P=0.734), and the 5-year overall survival rates were 93.8% and 90.8% ( P=0.691), respectively, and the differences were not statistically significant. Conclusions:In experienced medical centers, laparoscopic surgery for gastric GIST larger than 2 cm is safe and feasible, and can achieve comparable efficacy with open surgery. For gastric GISTs which do not locate in the greater curvature and the anterior wall of the stomach, and whose long diameter is ≤5 cm, laparoscopic surgery does not increase the risk of recurrence and metastasis, and can accelerate postoperative recovery.

Objective:To compare the efficacy between laparoscopy and open surgery for gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) larger than 2 cm.Methods:A multicenter retrospective cohort study was performed. Inclusion criteria: long diameter of primary gastric GIST > 2 cm; undergoing laparoscopy or open surgery; diagnosis confirmed by postoperative pathology without distant metastasis; without preoperative targeted therapy. Clinicopathological data of 857 gastric GIST patients, including 320 in PLA General Hospital, 284 in Shanghai Renji Hospital, 175 in Wuhan Union Hospital and 78 in Tianjin Cancer Hospital, from January 2010 to May 2017 were retrospectively collected. There were 418 males and 439 females, mainly aged between 50 and 70 years old. Among 857 patients, 413 were in the laparoscopy group and 444 in the open group. The nearest neighbor matching of propensity score matching method was conducted with 1:1 matching based on tumor location and size between laparoscopy and open group to obtain samples of covariate equilibrium, and the caliper value was 0.04. The t test, χ 2 test and Wilcoxon rank test were used to compare short-term efficacy, and the Kaplan-Meier curve and log rank test were applied to compare long-term outcomes between the two groups. Results:After propensity score matching, laparoscopy group and open group both enrolled 293 cases. The baseline data, including age, gender, tumor location, tumor long diameter, NIH classification, etc. were not significantly different between the two groups (all P>0.05). Compared with the open group, the laparoscopy group had less intraoperative blood loss [<100 ml: 2.9% (155/293) vs. 36.2% (106/293), Z=-12.857, P<0.001], shorter time to postoperative feeding [(4.0±0.2) days vs. (5.3±0.9) days, t=1.505, P=0.003] and to the removal of drainage tube [(4.8±1.0) days vs. (6.5±1.0) days, t=1.847, P=0.008], and shorter postoperative hospital stay [(8.6±0.3) days vs. (10.5±0.3) days, t=4.235, P<0.001]. Subgroups analysis according to anatomical location: (1) Gastric cardia and pylorus: there were no statistically significant differences in perioperative parameters between the two groups (all P>0.05). (2) Stomach base: feeding time after surgery [(4.0±0.2) days vs. (4.5±0.2) days, t=0.512, P=0.038], drainage tube removal time [(5.1±0.4) days vs. (6.4±0.6) days, t=0.517, P=0.044], postoperative hospital stay [(8.0±0.5) days vs. (11.1±0.9) days, t=0.500, P=0.002] were all significantly shorter in the laparoscopy group as compared to the open group, while the differences in other perioperative parameters were not statistically significant (all P>0.05). (3) Lesser curvature of the stomach: the laparoscopy group had less intraoperative blood loss [<100 ml ratio: 58.1% (43/74) vs. 33.7% (25/74), Z=7.632, P=0.034], shorter gastric tube removal time [(2.7±0.2) days vs. (3.2±0.3) days, t=0.503, P=0.007], earlier postoperative passage of gas [(2.8±0.1) days vs. (3.4±0.2) days, t=0.532, P=0.030], earlier postoperative feeding [(3.6±0.2) days vs. (4.3±0.2) days, t=0.508, P=0.020], shorter drainage tube removal time [(4.2±0.4) days vs. (5.7±0.5) days, t=0.508, P=0.020] and postoperative hospital stay [(8.3±0.6) days vs. (10.7±0.3) days, t=0.502, P=0.006] as compared to the open group. (4) Great curvature of the stomach: the laparoscopy group presented less intraoperative blood loss [<100 ml ratio: 52.7% (39/74) vs. 36.5% (27/74), Z=7.681, P=0.032], earlier gastric tube removal [(2.6±0.2) days vs. (3.6±0.2) days, t=0.501, P=0.001], earlier postoperative passage of gas [(2.7±0.2) days vs. (3.4±0.2) days, t=0.501, P=0.016], earlier postoperative feeding [(3.6±0.2) days vs. (4.7±0.2) days, t=0.500, P=0.001], shorter drainage tube removal time [(4.0±0.5) days to (5.9±0.4) days, t=0.508, P=0.002] and postoperative hospital stay [(7.5±0.3) days to (9.5±0.1) days, t=0.500, P=0.001] than the open group. Subgroup analysis according to tumor size: (1) Tumor long diameter 2.0-5.0 cm: the laparoscopy group had earlier passage of gas [(2.9±0.1) days vs. (3.5±0.1) days, t=0.500, P=0.001], earlier postoperative feeding [(4.5±0.1) days vs. (5.0±0.2) days, t=0.501, P=0.013], shorter drainage tube removal time [(4.8±0.3) days vs. (6.0±0.3) days, t=0.511, P=0.008] and postoperative hospital stay [(8.1±0.4) days to (10.1±0.3) days, t=0.513, P=0.001] than the open group. (2) Tumor long diameter 5.1-10.0 cm: in the laparoscopic group, postoperative feeding time [(4.0±0.2) days vs. (4.7±0.2) days, t=0.506, P=0.015], drainage tube removal time [(4.6±0.4) days vs. (6.4±0.5)) days, t=0.501, P=0.004], postoperative hospital stay [(8.2±0.3) days vs. (10.9±0.6) days, t=0.500, P=0.001] were all shorter than those in the open group. No intraoperative and postoperative complications were observed in each group. The 5-year recurrence-free survival rates of the laparoscopy group and the open group were 95.4% and 91.6%, respectively ( P=0.734), and the 5-year overall survival rates were 93.8% and 90.8% ( P=0.691), respectively, and the differences were not statistically significant. Conclusions:In experienced medical centers, laparoscopic surgery for gastric GIST larger than 2 cm is safe and feasible, and can achieve comparable efficacy with open surgery. For gastric GISTs which do not locate in the greater curvature and the anterior wall of the stomach, and whose long diameter is ≤5 cm, laparoscopic surgery does not increase the risk of recurrence and metastasis, and can accelerate postoperative recovery.

OBJECTIVETo analyze the efficacy and prognosis of different treatments on small intestinal gastrointestinal stromal tumors(SIGIST).

METHODSClinical data of 63 patients with SIGIST who were admitted to the Chinese PLA General Hospital from January 2004 to December 2013 were analyzed retrospectively. According to resection procedure and postoperative use of imatinib, patients were divided into R0 resection plus imatinib group (13 cases), R0 resection without imatinib group (42 cases), non-R0 resection plus imatinib group (7 cases), non-R0 resection without imatinib group (1 case). Survival was compared among groups. Result All the patients were followed up with a median length of 24 months(3 to 120 months), and the over survival (OS) rates at 1-year, 3-year, 5-year were 97%, 94% and 80%. In R0 resection plus imatinib group, R0 resection without imatinib group, and non-R0 resection plus imatinib group, the progression free survival(PFS) time was 24, 24 and 23 months; the 1-year PFS were 100%, 97% and 83%; the 3-year PFS were 100%, 45% and 83%; the 5-year PFS were 100%, 28% and 42%. R0 resection plus imatinib group had significantly higher PFS(all P<0.05). The case of non-R0 resection without imatinib died 6 months after operation. Among 55 patients undergoing R0 resection, recurrence was found in 16 patients, whose recurrence rates of 1-year, 3-yeart and 5-year were 2%,43% and 58%. Local recurrence was found in 8 cases, hepatic recurrence in 3 cases and widespread recurrence in 5 cases, who received simple imatinib, operation plus imatinib and imatinib intervention, with median survival time of 66.5 months, 92.5 months and 48 months respectively. One patient initiatively abandoned treatment and died 17 months later.

CONCLUSIONThe total resection and postoperative imatinib administration can improve the prognosis and raise the progression free survival of patients with small intestinal stromal tumors.

Antineoplastic Agents ; therapeutic use ; Benzamides ; therapeutic use ; Disease-Free Survival ; Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors ; drug therapy ; surgery ; Humans ; Imatinib Mesylate ; Intestinal Neoplasms ; drug therapy ; pathology ; surgery ; Intestine, Small ; pathology ; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local ; Piperazines ; therapeutic use ; Prognosis ; Pyrimidines ; therapeutic use ; Retrospective Studies

Objective To analyze the survival rates of gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs),and the influence of surgical treatment and imatinib to the survival times.Methods The clinical data of 132 patients with GIST who were admitted to Peoples Liberation Army Hospital from January 2003 to December 2013 were retrospectively analyzed.Results All the patients were followed up with a median time of 22 months (1-83 months).The survival rates of 1-year,3-year,5-year were 99 ％,96 ％,92 ％ in this study.The tumor located at cardiac part,fundus of stomach,greater curvature,lesser curvature and pylorus part was 19 cases (14.4 ％),34 cases (25.8 ％),38 cases (28.8 ％),38 cases (28.8 ％) and 3 cases (2.3 ％),respectively.The positive rates of CD117,CD34 and Ki-67 was 116 cases (87.9 ％),119 cases (90.2 ％),51 cases (38.6 ％).According to Fletcher risk classification,the patients of high-low risk,low risk,intermediate risk,and high risk were 10 cases (7.6 ％),34 cases (25.8 ％),14 cases (10.6 ％),and 74 cases (56.1％),respectively.The differences of survive rates in the different excision method and imatinib treatment had statistics significance (P =0.000).The differences of survive rates in Fletcher risk classification had statistics significance (P =0.028).However,the differences of survive rates in location of gastric GIST showed no significant difference (P ＞ 0.05).Conclusions GIST in different parts of gastric have not obviously different survival rates,respectively.The total resection and imatinib treatment could raise the survival rates of patients with GIST.

Objective To analyze the efficacy and prognosis of different treatments on small intestinal gastrointestinal stromal tumors (SIGIST). Methods Clinical data of 63 patients with SIGIST who were admitted to the Chinese PLA General Hospital from January 2004 to December 2013 were analyzed retrospectively. According to resection procedure and postoperative use of imatinib, patients were divided into R0 resection plus imatinib group (13 cases), R0 resection without imatinib group (42 cases), non-R0 resection plus imatinib group (7 cases), non-R0 resection without imatinib group (1 case). Survival was compared among groups. Result All the patients were followed up with a median length of 24 months(3 to 120 months), and the over survival (OS) rates at 1-year, 3-year, 5-year were 97%, 94% and 80%. In R0 resection plus imatinib group, R0 resection without imatinib group, and non-R0 resection plus imatinib group, the progression free survival (PFS) time was 24, 24 and 23 months; the 1-year PFS were 100%, 97% and 83%; the 3-year PFS were 100%, 45% and 83%; the 5-year PFS were 100%, 28% and 42%. R0 resection plus imatinib group had significantly higher PFS (all P<0.05). The case of non-R0 resection without imatinib died 6 months after operation. Among 55 patients undergoing R0 resection, recurrence was found in 16 patients, whose recurrence rates of 1-year, 3-yeart and 5-year were 2%,43% and 58%. Local recurrence was found in 8 cases, hepatic recurrence in 3 cases and widespread recurrence in 5 cases , who received simple imatinib , operation plus imatinib and imatinib intervention, with median survival time of 66.5 months, 92.5 months and 48 months respectively. One patient initiatively abandoned treatment and died 17 months later. Conclusion The total resection and postoperative imatinib administration can improve the prognosis and raise the progression free survival of patients with small intestinal stromal tumors.

Objective To analyze the efficacy and prognosis of different treatments on small intestinal gastrointestinal stromal tumors (SIGIST). Methods Clinical data of 63 patients with SIGIST who were admitted to the Chinese PLA General Hospital from January 2004 to December 2013 were analyzed retrospectively. According to resection procedure and postoperative use of imatinib, patients were divided into R0 resection plus imatinib group (13 cases), R0 resection without imatinib group (42 cases), non-R0 resection plus imatinib group (7 cases), non-R0 resection without imatinib group (1 case). Survival was compared among groups. Result All the patients were followed up with a median length of 24 months(3 to 120 months), and the over survival (OS) rates at 1-year, 3-year, 5-year were 97%, 94% and 80%. In R0 resection plus imatinib group, R0 resection without imatinib group, and non-R0 resection plus imatinib group, the progression free survival (PFS) time was 24, 24 and 23 months; the 1-year PFS were 100%, 97% and 83%; the 3-year PFS were 100%, 45% and 83%; the 5-year PFS were 100%, 28% and 42%. R0 resection plus imatinib group had significantly higher PFS (all P<0.05). The case of non-R0 resection without imatinib died 6 months after operation. Among 55 patients undergoing R0 resection, recurrence was found in 16 patients, whose recurrence rates of 1-year, 3-yeart and 5-year were 2%,43% and 58%. Local recurrence was found in 8 cases, hepatic recurrence in 3 cases and widespread recurrence in 5 cases , who received simple imatinib , operation plus imatinib and imatinib intervention, with median survival time of 66.5 months, 92.5 months and 48 months respectively. One patient initiatively abandoned treatment and died 17 months later. Conclusion The total resection and postoperative imatinib administration can improve the prognosis and raise the progression free survival of patients with small intestinal stromal tumors.

Objective To analyze the clinical characters,therapeutic effect of gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST),the effects of surgical approach and imatinib adjuvant therapy on it.Methods From January 2004 to April 2010,the clinical data of 214 patients with primary GIST were retrospectively analyzed.The effects of surgical approach and imatinib on the survival of the GIST patients were compared.Count data were analyzed by chi-square test,and the survival rates were analyzed with the life table method and Kaplan-Meier curve.Results A total of 214 GIST patients'survival rates of 1-year,3-year,5-year were 93.0％,87.0％ and 80.0％.According to the risk classification of National Institutes of Health,the differences of overall survival rates after surgery were statistically significant (x2 =22.058,P＜0.05).The differences of survival rate among different nuclear division number were statistically significant (x2=26.599,P＜0.05).The survival rate of pathological nuclear division number over 10/50 high power field (HPF) was the lowest.The overall survival rate of patients with gastrointestinal GIST was higher than patients with extragastrointestinal GIST,and the difference was statistically significant (x2 =68.139,P ＜ 0.05).After complete resection of the tumor,the survival rate of patients with local recurrence was higher than those with widely recurrence,and the difference was statistically significant (x2 =4.409,P＜ 0.05).After complete resection of the tumor,the survival rate of patients taking imatinib was higher than that of patients not taking imatinib.Conclusions The surgical treatment was the main therapy for GIST.Complete resection of the tumor and taking imatinib after surgery could improve the prognosis and the survival rate of the GIST patients.