The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of compound probiotics on milk performance,blood biochemical indexes,rumen fermentation parameters and nutrient digestibility of Holstein dairy cows in middle-and-later lactation.Forty-eight dairy cows with similar milk yield,days in milk and age were randomly divided into 4 groups treated with four different levels of compound probiotics as follows:the control group (0 g/d),group 1 (10 g/d),group 2 (20 g/d) and group 3 (30 g/d).The adaptation period was 7 days,and the total experimental period was 60 days.Results showed that:compared with the control group,supplementation of compound probiotics could improve milk yield and significantly increase the concentration of milk protein,lactose and total solids (P＜0.05);there was no significant effect on blood biochemical indexes (P＞ 0.05);compound probiotics could significantly increase the content of ammonia and microbial protein content (MCP) in the rumen (P＜ 0.05);the apparent nutrient digestibility of crude protein and crude fat of group 2 was significantly higher than other groups (P＜0.05);compared with the control group,the economic benefits of group 1,2,3 increased 2.28,4.80 and 4.09 yuan/d,respectively.In summary,dietary supplementation with 20 g/d of compound probiotics was the most effective method for milk performance,rumen fermentation parameters,nutrients apparent digestibility and economic benefit of Holstein dairy cows.

The total ascorbic acid contents of 21 kinds of vegetables and melons in Ch'angsha within the later 3 seasons of 1955 and the spring time of 1957 were determined with the 2,4-dinitrophenylhydrazine coloremetric method (Roe and Kuether, as well as its modification by Schaffert and Kingsley).From the result obtained, it is found that throughout the four seasons in Ch'angsha, there were many vegetables and melons rich in vitamin C. The antiscorbutic potency of the same species of vegetables showed seasonal variations.

Animals ; Caenorhabditis elegans ; metabolism ; radiation effects ; Caenorhabditis elegans Proteins ; genetics ; metabolism ; Light ; Lysine ; analogs & derivatives ; genetics ; metabolism ; Promoter Regions, Genetic ; Protein Transport ; RNA, Transfer ; genetics ; metabolism ; Tumor Necrosis Factor Ligand Superfamily Member 14 ; metabolism

Objective:To investigate the feasibility and safety of a robotic surgical system (or laparoscopy) in combination with colonoscopy (combined) for the treatment of stage T1N0M0 colorectal cancer.Methods:This was a descriptive case series. Indications for combined dual-scope surgery in this study were as follows: (1) preoperative colonoscopic examination of lesions in the middle and upper rectum and colon with pathologically confirmed high-grade intraepithelial neoplasia, intramucosal adenocarcinoma, or adenocarcinoma; (2) no distant or local lymph node metastases; and (3) endoscopic ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging evidence of tumor invasion of the mucosal or submucosal, but not the muscular, layer (i.e., T1). The clinical data of 13 patients with stage T1 colorectal cancer who had undergone dual-scope combined resection using a robotic surgery system or laparoscope-assisted combined colonoscopy surgery at the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University from April to October 2022 were retrospectively collected, including 6 males and 7 females, with a median age of 59 (48~88) years old. The tumors were located in the upper and middle rectum in six patients, in the sigmoid colon in three, and in the ascending colon in four. The median maximum diameter of the tumors was 3.0 (1.8–5.0) cm. The surgery was performed by a robotic surgery system (or laparoscopy) with peritumoral D1 lymph node dissection at the first station in the tumor area. The tumors were resected under direct vision and the defects in the intestinal wall were using a robotic surgery system (or laparoscopy). A robotic surgery system was combined with colonoscopy in eight cases and laparoscopy combined with colonoscopy in the remaining five. Studied variables includes surgical and pathological features, postoperative factors, and outcomes.Results:Surgery was successful in all 13 patients with no need for conversion to open surgery or intraoperative blood transfusion. The median operating time was 85 (60–120) minutes, median intraoperative bleeding 3 (2–5) mL, median number of lymph nodes harvested 3 (1–5), and the median circumferential resection margin 0.8 (0.5–1.0) cm. Postoperative pathological examination showed lymph node metastasis in one patient, who therefore underwent additional radical surgery. The median postoperative time to ambulation was 1 (1–2) days. The urinary catheters of all patients were removed 1 day after surgery and the median length of stay was 4 (3–5) days. No abdominal infection, anastomotic leakage or bleeding occurred in any of the study patients. The median follow-up time was 10 (6–12) months, during which no tumor recurrence or metastasis was found, and the quality of life was satisfactory.Conclusions:The combination of two minimally invasive platforms, a robotic surgery system (or laparoscopy) and colonoscopy, is safe and feasible for resection of stage T1 colorectal cancer and has a good short-term prognosis.

Objective:To investigate the feasibility and safety of a robotic surgical system (or laparoscopy) in combination with colonoscopy (combined) for the treatment of stage T1N0M0 colorectal cancer.Methods:This was a descriptive case series. Indications for combined dual-scope surgery in this study were as follows: (1) preoperative colonoscopic examination of lesions in the middle and upper rectum and colon with pathologically confirmed high-grade intraepithelial neoplasia, intramucosal adenocarcinoma, or adenocarcinoma; (2) no distant or local lymph node metastases; and (3) endoscopic ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging evidence of tumor invasion of the mucosal or submucosal, but not the muscular, layer (i.e., T1). The clinical data of 13 patients with stage T1 colorectal cancer who had undergone dual-scope combined resection using a robotic surgery system or laparoscope-assisted combined colonoscopy surgery at the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University from April to October 2022 were retrospectively collected, including 6 males and 7 females, with a median age of 59 (48~88) years old. The tumors were located in the upper and middle rectum in six patients, in the sigmoid colon in three, and in the ascending colon in four. The median maximum diameter of the tumors was 3.0 (1.8–5.0) cm. The surgery was performed by a robotic surgery system (or laparoscopy) with peritumoral D1 lymph node dissection at the first station in the tumor area. The tumors were resected under direct vision and the defects in the intestinal wall were using a robotic surgery system (or laparoscopy). A robotic surgery system was combined with colonoscopy in eight cases and laparoscopy combined with colonoscopy in the remaining five. Studied variables includes surgical and pathological features, postoperative factors, and outcomes.Results:Surgery was successful in all 13 patients with no need for conversion to open surgery or intraoperative blood transfusion. The median operating time was 85 (60–120) minutes, median intraoperative bleeding 3 (2–5) mL, median number of lymph nodes harvested 3 (1–5), and the median circumferential resection margin 0.8 (0.5–1.0) cm. Postoperative pathological examination showed lymph node metastasis in one patient, who therefore underwent additional radical surgery. The median postoperative time to ambulation was 1 (1–2) days. The urinary catheters of all patients were removed 1 day after surgery and the median length of stay was 4 (3–5) days. No abdominal infection, anastomotic leakage or bleeding occurred in any of the study patients. The median follow-up time was 10 (6–12) months, during which no tumor recurrence or metastasis was found, and the quality of life was satisfactory.Conclusions:The combination of two minimally invasive platforms, a robotic surgery system (or laparoscopy) and colonoscopy, is safe and feasible for resection of stage T1 colorectal cancer and has a good short-term prognosis.

Peking Union Medical College Hospital, as one of the most stressful medical institutions in China, is facing the problem of emergency department overcrowding. In order to effectively alleviate the emergency overcrowding, improve the medical quality and patients′ medical experience, the hospital firmly grasped the two incremental links of " throughput" and " output" factors, established a multidisciplinary and multi-department cooperation team, constructed a close medical alliance cooperation mode, and innovated and explored a harmonious emergency overcrowding relief mode with the goal of unblocking the " exit" of patients. The practice showed that the comprehensive measures could effectively alleviate the problem of emergency overcrowding, and improve the medical environment and medical quality.

Background and Objectives: Angiographic assessment of coronary stenosis severity using quantitative coronary angiography (QCA) is often inconsistent with that based on fractional flow reserve (FFR) or intravascular ultrasound (IVUS). We investigated the incidence of discrepancies between QCA and FFR or IVUS, and the outcomes of FFR- and IVUS-guided strategies in discordant coronary lesions. Methods: This study was a post-hoc analysis of the FLAVOUR study. We used a QCA-derived diameter stenosis (DS) of 60% or greater, the highest tertile, to classify coronary lesions as concordant or discordant with FFR or IVUS criteria for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). The patient-oriented composite outcome (POCO) was defined as a composite of death, myocardial infarction, or revascularization at 24 months. Results: The discordance rate between QCA and FFR or IVUS was 30.2% (n=551). The QCAFFR discordance rate was numerically lower than the QCA-IVUS discordance rate (28.2% vs. 32.4%, p=0.050). In 200 patients with ≥60% DS, PCI was deferred according to negative FFR (n=141) and negative IVUS (n=59) (15.3% vs. 6.5%, p<0.001). The POCO incidence was comparable between the FFR- and IVUS-guided deferral strategies (5.9% vs. 3.4%, p=0.479).Conversely, 351 patients with DS <60% underwent PCI according to positive FFR (n=118) and positive IVUS (n=233) (12.8% vs. 25.9%, p<0.001). FFR- and IVUS-guided PCI did not differ in the incidence of POCO (9.5% vs. 6.5%, p=0.294). Conclusions The proportion of QCA-FFR or IVUS discordance was approximately one third for intermediate coronary lesions. FFR- or IVUS-guided strategies for these lesions were comparable with respect to POCO at 24 months.

Background and Objectives: The Fractional Flow Reserve and Intravascular UltrasoundGuided Intervention Strategy for Clinical Outcomes in Patients with Intermediate Stenosis (FLAVOUR) trial demonstrated non-inferiority of fractional flow reserve (FFR)-guided percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) compared with intravascular ultrasound (IVUS)-guided PCI. We sought to investigate the cost-effectiveness of FFR-guided PCI compared to IVUS-guided PCI in Korea. Methods: A 2-part cost-effectiveness model, composed of a short-term decision tree model and a long-term Markov model, was developed for patients who underwent PCI to treat intermediate stenosis (40% to 70% stenosis by visual estimation on coronary angiography).The lifetime healthcare costs and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) were estimated from the healthcare system perspective. Transition probabilities were mainly referred from the FLAVOUR trial, and healthcare costs were mainly obtained through analysis of Korean National Health Insurance claims data. Health utilities were mainly obtained from the Seattle Angina Questionnaire responses of FLAVOUR trial participants mapped to EQ-5D. Results: From the Korean healthcare system perspective, the base-case analysis showed that FFR-guided PCI was 2,451 U.S. dollar lower in lifetime healthcare costs and 0.178 higher in QALYs compared to IVUS-guided PCI. FFR-guided PCI remained more likely to be cost-effective over a wide range of willingness-to-pay thresholds in the probabilistic sensitivity analysis. Conclusions Based on the results from the FLAVOUR trial, FFR-guided PCI is projected to decrease lifetime healthcare costs and increase QALYs compared with IVUS-guided PCI in intermediate coronary lesion, and it is a dominant strategy in Korea.

Background and Objectives: Angiographic assessment of coronary stenosis severity using quantitative coronary angiography (QCA) is often inconsistent with that based on fractional flow reserve (FFR) or intravascular ultrasound (IVUS). We investigated the incidence of discrepancies between QCA and FFR or IVUS, and the outcomes of FFR- and IVUS-guided strategies in discordant coronary lesions. Methods: This study was a post-hoc analysis of the FLAVOUR study. We used a QCA-derived diameter stenosis (DS) of 60% or greater, the highest tertile, to classify coronary lesions as concordant or discordant with FFR or IVUS criteria for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). The patient-oriented composite outcome (POCO) was defined as a composite of death, myocardial infarction, or revascularization at 24 months. Results: The discordance rate between QCA and FFR or IVUS was 30.2% (n=551). The QCAFFR discordance rate was numerically lower than the QCA-IVUS discordance rate (28.2% vs. 32.4%, p=0.050). In 200 patients with ≥60% DS, PCI was deferred according to negative FFR (n=141) and negative IVUS (n=59) (15.3% vs. 6.5%, p<0.001). The POCO incidence was comparable between the FFR- and IVUS-guided deferral strategies (5.9% vs. 3.4%, p=0.479).Conversely, 351 patients with DS <60% underwent PCI according to positive FFR (n=118) and positive IVUS (n=233) (12.8% vs. 25.9%, p<0.001). FFR- and IVUS-guided PCI did not differ in the incidence of POCO (9.5% vs. 6.5%, p=0.294). Conclusions The proportion of QCA-FFR or IVUS discordance was approximately one third for intermediate coronary lesions. FFR- or IVUS-guided strategies for these lesions were comparable with respect to POCO at 24 months.

Background and Objectives: The Fractional Flow Reserve and Intravascular UltrasoundGuided Intervention Strategy for Clinical Outcomes in Patients with Intermediate Stenosis (FLAVOUR) trial demonstrated non-inferiority of fractional flow reserve (FFR)-guided percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) compared with intravascular ultrasound (IVUS)-guided PCI. We sought to investigate the cost-effectiveness of FFR-guided PCI compared to IVUS-guided PCI in Korea. Methods: A 2-part cost-effectiveness model, composed of a short-term decision tree model and a long-term Markov model, was developed for patients who underwent PCI to treat intermediate stenosis (40% to 70% stenosis by visual estimation on coronary angiography).The lifetime healthcare costs and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) were estimated from the healthcare system perspective. Transition probabilities were mainly referred from the FLAVOUR trial, and healthcare costs were mainly obtained through analysis of Korean National Health Insurance claims data. Health utilities were mainly obtained from the Seattle Angina Questionnaire responses of FLAVOUR trial participants mapped to EQ-5D. Results: From the Korean healthcare system perspective, the base-case analysis showed that FFR-guided PCI was 2,451 U.S. dollar lower in lifetime healthcare costs and 0.178 higher in QALYs compared to IVUS-guided PCI. FFR-guided PCI remained more likely to be cost-effective over a wide range of willingness-to-pay thresholds in the probabilistic sensitivity analysis. Conclusions Based on the results from the FLAVOUR trial, FFR-guided PCI is projected to decrease lifetime healthcare costs and increase QALYs compared with IVUS-guided PCI in intermediate coronary lesion, and it is a dominant strategy in Korea.