1.Platelet and tumor metastasis
Journal of International Oncology 2010;37(10):790-791
Platelets can interact with circulating tumor cells to form platelet-tumor cell thrombus, which can facilitate the immune evasion of tumor cells. Activated platelets can also release a variety of bioactive factors, promoting tumor growth, invasion and angiogenesis. Research exploring the relationship between platelet and tumor metastasis can help elucidate the mechanisms of tumor metastasis and find new therapies for treatment of tumor metastasis.
2.Preliminary study on the relationship between thrombocytosis and gastric cancer
Journal of International Oncology 2014;41(5):380-382
Objective To explore the relationship between thrombocytosis and gastric cancer at the points of clinicopathological stage and prognosis.Methods The clinical data of 156 gastric cancer patients from January 2005 to January 2007 were retrospectively analyzed,and the status of patients was obtained through telephone calls.The frequency of patients with thrombocytosis in different clinicopathological stages was analyzed,and comparison of survival time was made between normal PLT groups and thrombocytosis groups.Results 20.5% patients with gastric cancer were accompanied with thrombocytosis in 156 cases,and the frequency of patients with thrombocytosis in Ⅰ,Ⅱ,Ⅲ,Ⅳ stage were 4.8%,21.7%,24.4%,30.4%,and the difference was statistically significante (x2 =8.768,P =0.003).Patients with thrombocytosis had a shorter survival time than those with normal platelet counts (one year survival rate:59.4% vs 81.5%,x2 =6.984,P =0.008 ; three years survival rate:34.4% vs 63.7%,x2 =8.968,P =0.003).Conclusion In gastric cancer,thrombocytosis is associated with TNM stage.The gastric cancer patients with thrombocytosis have poorer prognosis than those without thrombocytosis.
3.A dosimetric comparison of volumetric modulated arc therapy with intensity modulated radiation therapy for head and neck cancer
Journal of International Oncology 2020;47(8):457-461
Objective:To compare the dosimetric differences between volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) and intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) for head and neck cancer.Methods:From January 2019 to December 2019, 46 cases of patients with head and neck cancer confirmed by pathology in the First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University were selected. All patients underwent CT-simulation in supine position. Planning target volumes (PTVs) were delineated for two dose levels of PTV70 and PTV54 in 35 equal fraction. Simultaneous integrated boost plan was generated for all patients and optimized with both techniques, VMAT and IMRT with similar planning objectives. The dosimetry differences between the two plans were compared.Results:The conformity index (CI)95% of PTV70 in VMAT plan was higher than that in IMRT plan (0.91±0.02 vs. 0.86±0.06), and the difference was statistically significant ( t=4.933, P=0.004). The homogeneity index (HI)95% of PTV54 in VMAT plan was superior to that in IMRT (0.09±0.04 vs. 0.26±0.02), and the difference was statistically significant ( t=4.548, P=0.038). The spinal cord D 1% of VMAT was lower than that in IMRT (37.62±4.34 vs. 40.93±7.45), and the difference was statistically significant ( t=2.615, P=0.045). The dose of left parotid gland in VMAT was (21.28±8.13) Gy and the dose of right parotid gland was (22.39±7.42) Gy, which were slightly lower than those in IMRT [(22.73±11.42) Gy and (24.25±7.91) Gy], but the differences were not statistically significant ( t=0.703, P=0.322; t=1.134, P=0.315). Compared with IMRT, VMAT could significantly reduce the number of monitor units (521±112 vs. 2 129±564), and could significantly shorten the treatment time of patients [(2.12±0.39) min vs. (9.18±2.62) min], and the differences were statistically significant ( t=18.957, P<0.001; t=18.213, P<0.001). Conclusion:The dose distribution of VMAT technology is better than IMRT, the dose of organ at risk is reduced, the monitor unit is lesser, and the treatment time is shorter.