1.Prognostic Value of Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio in Obstructing Colorectal Cancer Treated by Endoscopic Stenting as a Bridge to Surgery
Jiwei GUO ; Aik Yong CHOK ; Hui Jun LIM ; Wei Xuan TAY ; Weng Kit LYE ; Lasitha Bhagya SAMARAKOON ; Emile John TAN ; Ronnie MATHEW
Annals of Coloproctology 2021;37(3):159-165
Purpose:
Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) has been reported to predict adverse survival outcomes among patients with colorectal cancer (CRC). This study evaluates the prognostic value of NLR among patients with obstructing CRC who successfully underwent stenting before curative surgery.
Methods:
We retrospectively reviewed patients who underwent stenting before surgery. Patient demographics, tumor characteristics, perioperative outcomes, recurrence-free survival (RFS), and overall survival (OS) were analyzed. NLR was calculated from the differential white blood cell counts at least 4 days after successful stenting, before elective surgery. Optimal cutoff to dichotomize NLR was obtained by maximizing log-rank test statistic with recursive partitioning of KaplanMeier RFS and OS curves. The optimal cutoff for high NLR was ≥ 5 at presentation before stenting, and ≥ 4 after stenting.
Results:
Fifty-seven patients with localized obstructing CRC underwent successful endoscopic stenting before curative surgery. High NLR was associated with lymphovascular invasion (P = 0.006) and apical lymph node involvement (P = 0.034). Major perioperative complication(s) (hazard ratio [HR], 11.34; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.49 to 51.56; P < 0.01) and high NLR (HR, 3.69; 95% CI, 1.46 to 9.35; P < 0.01) negatively impacted OS on univariate and multivariate analyses. High NLR negatively impacted RFS on univariate analysis (HR, 2.91; 95% CI, 1.29 to 6.60; P = 0.01).
Conclusion
NLR of ≥ 4 after stenting is an independent prognostic factor among patients with obstructing localized CRC who are successfully decompressed by endoscopic stenting before curative surgery.
2.Prognostic Value of Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio in Obstructing Colorectal Cancer Treated by Endoscopic Stenting as a Bridge to Surgery
Jiwei GUO ; Aik Yong CHOK ; Hui Jun LIM ; Wei Xuan TAY ; Weng Kit LYE ; Lasitha Bhagya SAMARAKOON ; Emile John TAN ; Ronnie MATHEW
Annals of Coloproctology 2021;37(3):159-165
Purpose:
Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) has been reported to predict adverse survival outcomes among patients with colorectal cancer (CRC). This study evaluates the prognostic value of NLR among patients with obstructing CRC who successfully underwent stenting before curative surgery.
Methods:
We retrospectively reviewed patients who underwent stenting before surgery. Patient demographics, tumor characteristics, perioperative outcomes, recurrence-free survival (RFS), and overall survival (OS) were analyzed. NLR was calculated from the differential white blood cell counts at least 4 days after successful stenting, before elective surgery. Optimal cutoff to dichotomize NLR was obtained by maximizing log-rank test statistic with recursive partitioning of KaplanMeier RFS and OS curves. The optimal cutoff for high NLR was ≥ 5 at presentation before stenting, and ≥ 4 after stenting.
Results:
Fifty-seven patients with localized obstructing CRC underwent successful endoscopic stenting before curative surgery. High NLR was associated with lymphovascular invasion (P = 0.006) and apical lymph node involvement (P = 0.034). Major perioperative complication(s) (hazard ratio [HR], 11.34; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.49 to 51.56; P < 0.01) and high NLR (HR, 3.69; 95% CI, 1.46 to 9.35; P < 0.01) negatively impacted OS on univariate and multivariate analyses. High NLR negatively impacted RFS on univariate analysis (HR, 2.91; 95% CI, 1.29 to 6.60; P = 0.01).
Conclusion
NLR of ≥ 4 after stenting is an independent prognostic factor among patients with obstructing localized CRC who are successfully decompressed by endoscopic stenting before curative surgery.
3.EPOSTER • DRUG DISCOVERY AND DEVELOPMENT
Marwan Ibrahim ; Olivier D LaFlamme ; Turgay Akay ; Julia Barczuk ; Wioletta Rozpedek-Kaminska ; Grzegorz Galita ; Natalia Siwecka ; Ireneusz Majsterek ; Sharmni Vishnu K. ; Thin Thin Wi ; Saint Nway Aye ; Arun Kumar ; Grace Devadason ; Fatin Aqilah Binti Ishak ; Goh Jia Shen ; Dhaniya A/P Subramaniam ; Hiew Ke Wei ; Hong Yan Ren ; Sivalingam Nalliah ; Nikitha Lalindri Mareena Senaratne ; Chong Chun Wie ; Divya Gopinath ; Pang Yi Xuan ; Mohamed Ismath Fathima Fahumida ; Muhammad Imran Bin Al Nazir Hussain ; Nethmi Thathsarani Jayathilake ; Sujata Khobragade ; Htoo Htoo Kyaw Soe ; Soe Moe ; Mila Nu Nu Htay ; Rosamund Koo ; Tan Wai Yee ; Wong Zi Qin ; Lau Kai Yee ; Ali Haider Mohammed ; Ali Blebil ; Juman Dujaili ; Alicia Yu Tian Tan ; Cheryl Yan Yen Ng ; Ching Xin Ni ; Michelle Ng Yeen Tan ; Kokila A/P Thiagarajah ; Justin Jing Cherg Chong ; Yong Khai Pang ; Pei Wern Hue ; Raksaini Sivasubramaniam ; Fathimath Hadhima ; Jun Jean Ong ; Matthew Joseph Manavalan ; Reyna Rehan ; Tularama Naidu ; Hansi Amarasinghe ; Minosh Kumar ; Sdney Jia Eer Tew ; Yee Sin Chong ; Yi Ting Sim ; Qi Xuan Ng ; Wei Jin Wong ; Shaun Wen Huey Lee ; Ronald Fook Seng Lee ; Wei Ni Tay ; Yi Tan ; Wai Yew Yang ; Shu Hwa Ong ; Yee Siew Lim ; Siddique Abu Nowajish ; Zobaidul Amin ; Umajeyam Anbarasan ; Lim Kean Ghee ; John Pinto ; Quek Jia Hui ; Ching Xiu Wei ; Dominic Lim Tao Ran ; Philip George ; Chandramani Thuraisingham ; Tan Kok Joon ; Wong Zhi Hang ; Freya Tang Sin Wei ; Ho Ket Li ; Shu Shuen Yee ; Goon Month Lim ; Wen Tien Tan ; Sin Wei Tang
International e-Journal of Science, Medicine and Education 2022;16(Suppl1):21-37