Objective To explore the perioperative outcomes and safety of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) in laparoscopic radical cystectomy (LRC).Methods We retrospectively evaluated outcome of 10 LRC patients on ERAS protocol from May 2017 to October 2017,and 39 LRC patients on conventional recovery after surgery(CRAS) protocol from July 2015 to November 2016.There were (60.9 ±11.4) years and (63.7 ± 12.1) years in ERAS group and CRAS group respectively(P =0.514);(25.5 ±2.7) kg/m2 and (24.4 ± 3.6) kg/m2 with body mass index (P =0.375).Both of the median of charlson comorbidity index (P =0.931) and American Society of Anesthesiologists score (P =0.254) were 2 There was no statistical significance between the two groups for type of urinary diversion and preoperative laboratory studies (P ＞ 0.05).Patients' perioperative outcomes,early (30-day) complications and postoperative readmission rate were compared.Results The ERAS group had less intraoperative crystalloid infusion [(950.0 ± 474.3) ml vs.(1 797.4 ± 448.1) ml,P ＜ 0.001],faster removed gastric tube (0 d vs.4 d,P ＜0.001),and shorter passing flatus time [(1.6 ± 0.8) d vs.(2.9 ± 1.4) d,P =0.006] than the CRAS group;however,no difference was found in terms of intraoperative colliod infusion [(1 110.0 ± 331.5)ml vs.(1 117.9 ± 397.9) ml,P =0.954].No patients from either group required conversion to open surgery.There was no significant difference between the two groups for operative time (P =0.311),estimated blood loss (P =0.073),drain days (P =0.681),postoperative hospital stay (P =0.509),overall blood transfusion (P =1.000),intensive care unit stay (P =1.000) and tumor characteristics (pathological stage,histology,nodes removed,positive nodes,lymph node-positive patients,positive surgical margins).The 30-day postoperative complications were documented in 5 (50％)and 23 (59％)patients in groups ERAS and CRAS (P =0.878),respectively.And the most common complication were minor complications (Clavien-Dindo grade 1 and 2) in both groups (100.0％ vs.86.9％,P =0.729).The 30-day readmission rate was 20.0％ (2 patients) in ERAS group and 10.3％ (4 patients) in CRAS group with no statistical significance(P =0.588).Conclusions Our ERAS protocol expedited bowel function recovery after RC and urinary diversion without increasing in 30-day complications compared with CRAS.The key of implement ERAS pathway is to explore and develop their own protocol conformed to their medical treatment enviroment.