Abdomen ; surgery ; Anticoagulants ; therapeutic use ; Aspirin ; therapeutic use ; Heparin ; therapeutic use ; Humans ; Pelvis ; surgery ; Postoperative Complications ; prevention & control ; Venous Thrombosis ; prevention & control ; Warfarin ; therapeutic use

Anticoagulants ; therapeutic use ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Pulmonary Embolism ; drug therapy ; Sleep Apnea, Obstructive ; complications ; Warfarin ; therapeutic use

Anticoagulants ; therapeutic use ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Pulmonary Embolism ; drug therapy ; Sleep Apnea, Obstructive ; complications ; Warfarin ; therapeutic use

Aged ; Anticoagulants/therapeutic use* ; Atrial Fibrillation/drug therapy* ; Humans ; Risk Factors ; Stroke/prevention & control* ; Warfarin

This guideline focuses on the primary prevention of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in Korea. The guidelines should be individualized and aim at patients scheduled for major surgery, as well as patients with a history of trauma, high-risk pregnancy, cancer, or other severe medical illnesses. Currently, no nation-wide data on the incidence of VTE exist, and randomized controlled trials aiming at the prevention of VTE in Korea have yielded few results. Therefore, these guidelines were based on the second edition of the Japanese Guidelines for the Prevention of VTE and the eighth edition of the American College of Chest Physicians (ACCP) Evidenced-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines. These guidelines establish low-, moderate-, and high-risk groups, and recommend appropriate thromboprophylaxis for each group.
Heparin, Low-Molecular-Weight/therapeutic use ; Humans ; Polysaccharides/therapeutic use ; Republic of Korea ; Risk Factors ; Venous Thromboembolism/*prevention & control/surgery/therapy ; Warfarin/therapeutic use

BACKGROUNDNon-valvular atrial fibrillation is associated with an increased risk of ischemic stroke; however, the appropriate intensity of anticoagulation therapy for Chinese patients has not been determined. The purpose of this study was to compare the safety and the efficacy of standard-intensity warfarin therapy, low-intensity warfarin therapy, and aspirin therapy for the prevention of ischemic events in Chinese patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF).

METHODSA total of 786 patients from 75 Chinese hospitals were enrolled in this study and randomized into three therapy groups: standard-intensity warfarin (international normalized ratio (INR) 2.1 to 2.5) group, low-intensity warfarin (INR 1.6 to 2.0) group and aspirin (200 mg per day) group. All patients were evaluated by physicians at 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21 and 24 months after randomization to obtain a patient questionnaire, physical examination and related laboratory tests.

RESULTSThe annual event rates of ischemic stroke, transient ischemic attack (TIA) or systemic thromboembolism were 2.6%, 3.1% and 6.9% in the standard-intensity warfarin, low-intensity warfarin and aspirin groups, respectively (P = 0.027). Thromboembolic event rates in both warfarin groups were significantly lower than that in the aspirin group (P = 0.018, P = 0.044), and there was no significant difference between the two warfarin groups. Severe hemorrhagic events occurred in 15 patients, 7 (2.6%) in the standard-intensity warfarin group, 7 (2.4%) in the low-intensity warfarin group and 1 (0.4%) in the aspirin group. The severe hemorrhagic event rates in the warfarin groups were higher than that in the aspirin group, but the difference did not reach statistical significance (P = 0.101). The mild hemorrhagic and total hemorrhagic event rates in the warfarin groups (whether in the standard-intensity warfarin group or low-intensity warfarin group) were much higher than that in the aspirin group with the annual event rates of total hemorrhages of 10.2%, 7.6% and 2.2%, respectively, in the 3 groups (P = 0.001). Furthermore, there was no significant difference in all cause mortality among the three study groups.

CONCLUSIONIn Chinese patients with NVAF, the warfarin therapy (INR 1.6 - 2.5) for the prevention of thromboembolic events was superior to aspirin.

Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Anticoagulants ; administration & dosage ; therapeutic use ; Aspirin ; administration & dosage ; therapeutic use ; Atrial Fibrillation ; drug therapy ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Warfarin ; administration & dosage ; therapeutic use

The optimal perioperative anticoagulation management in patients on warfarin therapy is poorly defined due to the lack of randomized trials. Because guidelines are heterogeneous, it was hypothesized that "treatment strategies are not uniform in clinical practice". Between February 2003 and May 2003, a questionnaire with 4 different clinical scenarios was distributed to physicians by e-mail, or direct contact was made by a survey monitor. Two scenarios described the cases of patients with a mechanical heart valve (MHV) in the mitral position, with additional risk factors for a systemic embolism; one undergoing major (scenario 1) and the other minor surgery (scenario 3). Two scenarios described patients with an aortic MHV; one undergoing major (scenario 2) and the other minor (scenario 4) surgery. Different preoperative and postoperative management options were offered. The treatment options for all scenarios were the same. Of the 90 questionnaires distributed, 52 (57.8%) were returned. Hospitalization for full-dose intravenous unfractionated heparin (IV UH) was the most commonly selected strategy in the preoperative phase for scenarios 1 (59%), 2 (42%) and 3 (44%). In scenario 4, 34% chose IV UH. Outpatient, full- dose, subcutaneous UH or low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) was the most selected option in the postoperative phase for all scenarios, with the exception of number 4 (52.9% in scenario 1, 34% in scenario 2, 32%, in scenario 3 and 28% in scenario 4). Even among expert clinicians, the management of perioperative anticoagulation is heterogeneous. In particular, the definition of risk categories and the optimal intensity of antithrombotic drugs need to be defined by well-designed prospective studies.
Anticoagulants/*therapeutic use ; Health Care Surveys ; *Heart Valve Prosthesis ; Humans ; Korea/epidemiology ; Perioperative Care/*methods ; *Physicians ; Risk Factors ; Thrombosis/epidemiology/*prevention & control ; Warfarin/*therapeutic use

Adolescent ; Adult ; Anticoagulants ; therapeutic use ; Aortic Valve Stenosis ; congenital ; surgery ; Dengue ; complications ; Heart Valve Prosthesis ; Humans ; Male ; Thrombocytopenia ; etiology ; Warfarin ; therapeutic use

OBJECTIVETo evaluate the factors responsible for the insufficient application of oral anticoagulation (OAC) in Chinese patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation.

METHODSThe research is a single center registration study in a tertiary referral hospital in Beijing. The general characteristics, history of atrial fibrillation, comorbidities and anticoagulation treatment were obtained from all patients.Factors affecting the oral Walfarin use were evaluated by univariable and multivariable regression analysis.

RESULTSOAC therapy with Walfarin was applied on Only 214(39.4%) out of 576 consecutive patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation. The OAC rate was 30.3% among non-ablation patients. Patients with persistent atrial fibrillation, diabetes, chronic heart failure, history of ischemic stroke/TIA and higher CHA2DS2-VASc score were more likely prescribed with Walfarin. Multivariable regression analysis showed that persistent fibrillation, history of chronic heart failure, ischemic stroke/TIA and non-coronary heart disease predicted the treatment with Walfarin.

CONCLUSIONSOAC use is extremely low in Chinese patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation. More efforts are warranted to improve OAC use in these patients.

Administration, Oral ; Aged ; Anticoagulants ; administration & dosage ; therapeutic use ; Atrial Fibrillation ; drug therapy ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Regression Analysis ; Warfarin ; administration & dosage ; therapeutic use

OBJECTIVETo investigate the clinical application of anticoagulation treatment with warfarin after prosthetic heart valve replacement and compare the effect and safety of different anticoagulant intensities.

METHODSA total of 845 Chinese patients receiving oral warfarin for anticoagulant treatment after prosthetic heart valve replacement in Guangdong General Hospital between 2000 and 2008 were enrolled in this survey. The general data, clinical data, medications, international normalized ratio (INR) and results of echocardiogram of these patients were followed up to observe the incidence of complication of thrombo-embolism and such adverse effect as hemorrhage.

RESULTSAll the patients were of Han nationality, and Cantonese accounted for 88.04%. The daily mean maintenance dose of warfarin was 2.92∓0.88 mg in these patients with a median INR of 2.09∓0.39. Of these patients, 44.62% received low-intensity anticoagulant treatment with warfarin with the INR maintained between 1.5 and 2.0, and 56.45% had standard anticoagulant intensity with the INR maintained between 2.0 and 3.0. The total incidence of thrombo-embolism was 4.14%. Severe hemorrhage occurred in 14 cases (1.66%), most frequently in the alimentary tract. The events of hemorrhage were correlated to the type of prosthetic heart valve replacement, occurring more frequently in patients with mechanical prosthetic heart valve replacement than in those with biological ones. No significant difference was found in the incidence of thrombo-embolism and server hemorrhage between the two groups receiving low and standard intensity therapy anticoagulant.

CONCLUSIONThe effect and safety of low-intensity anticoagulant treatment are comparable to that of standard intensity treatment in Chinese Han patients, and anticoagulation treatment with warfarin is effective and safe to maintain the INR between 1.8-3.0.

Adult ; Anticoagulants ; administration & dosage ; therapeutic use ; Female ; Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation ; methods ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Postoperative Period ; Warfarin ; administration & dosage ; therapeutic use