OBJECTIVE: To explore the clinical characteristics and molecular genetic mechanism of a fetus with recombinant chromosome 8 (Rec8) syndrome. METHODS: A fetus who was diagnosed with Rec8 syndrome at the Provincial Hospital Affiliated to Shandong First Medical University on July 20, 2021 due to high risk for sex chromosomal aneuploidy indicated by non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) (at 21st gestational week) was selected as the study subject. Clinical data of the fetus was collected. G-banded karyotyping and chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA) were carried out on the amniotic fluid sample. Peripheral blood samples of the couple were also subjected to G banded karyotyping analysis. RESULTS: Prenatal ultrasonography at 23rd gestational week revealed hypertelorism, thick lips, renal pelvis separation, intrahepatic echogenic foci, and ventricular septal defect. The karyotype of amniotic fluid was 46,XX,rec(8)(qter→q22.3::p23.1→qter), and CMA was arr[GRCh37]8p23.3p23.1(158049_6793322)×1, 8q22.3q24.3(101712402_146295771)×3. The karyotype of the pregnant woman was 46,XX,inv(8)(p23.1q22.3), whilst that of her husband was normal. CONCLUSION The Rec8 syndrome in the fetus may be attributed to the pericentric inversion of chromosome 8 in its mother. Molecular testing revealed that the breakpoints of this Rec8 have differed from previously reported ones.
Humans ; Fetus/abnormalities* ; Chromosomes, Human, Pair 8 ; Female ; Pregnancy ; Karyotyping

OBJECTIVETo assess the value of combined fetal karyotyping and chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA) for the verification of high-risk pregnancy signaled by noninvasive prenatal screening (NIPS) based on high-throughput sequencing.

METHODSOne hundred and fifty-one pregnant women with high risks for aneuploidies of chromosomes 13, 18, 21, X and Y or pathological copy number variations (CNVs) by NIPS were subjected to amniocytic karyotyping and CMA analysis.

RESULTSOne hundred and forty-two women were found to have a high risk for fetal chromosomal aneuploidies, which included 83 cases of trisomy 21, 17 cases of trisomy 18, 2 cases of trisomy 13, and 40 cases of sex chromosome aneuploidies. Amniocytic karyotyping and CMA analysis has confirmed 81 cases of trisomy 21, 15 cases of trisomy 18, 10 cases of 47,XXY, 4 cases of 47,XXX, 2 cases of 47,XYY and 1 case of 46,X,del(X)(q26.1). Two trisomy 21, two trisomy 18, 2 trisomy 13, and 23 cases of sex chromosomal aneuploidies were verified as false positives. For 9 women with pathological fetal CNVs detected by NIPS, combined fetal karyotyping and CMA has confirmed 1 case of chromosome 13 microdeletion, 1 case of chromosome 18 microduplication, and 1 case of chromosome 18 deletion. For a case with 30 Mb duplication of chromosome 2 and 25 Mb duplication of chromosome 8, CMA analysis had no positive finding, while fetal umbilical cord blood karyotyping has yielded a 46,XX,dup(2)(p23.1p25.3)[13]/46,XX[87] karyotype. The remaining 5 cases were confirmed as false positive results.

CONCLUSIONCombined fetal karyotyping and CMA has provided a powerful tool for verifying high-risk fetuses signaled by NIPS.

Aneuploidy ; DNA Copy Number Variations ; Down Syndrome ; Female ; High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing ; methods ; Humans ; Karyotyping ; Microarray Analysis ; Pregnancy ; Prenatal Diagnosis ; Trisomy 13 Syndrome ; Trisomy 18 Syndrome

Objective:To compare the consistency and difference of non-mydriatic two-field 45° ultra-wide field Optos and Clarus500 fundus imaging in a large-scale diabetic retinopathy (DR) screening.Methods:A diagnostic methodology study. From November 2020 to August 2021, 526 eyes of 277 patients with type 2 diabetes who diagnosed in Department of Ophthalmology, Henan Provincial People's Hospital were included in the study. Among them, there were 175 males with 328 eyes and 102 females with 198 eyes; the age was 53±10 years old. The same experienced technician performed the non-mydriatic dual-field 45° fundus imaging and the non-mydriatic ultra-wide-angle imaging system Optos, Clarus500 single-field fundus imaging examination on the patient on the same day, and obtained the dual-field 45° fundus image and Optos, Clarus500 single-field fundus image. The Optos and Clarus500 single-field fundus images in the same area as the dual-field 45° fundus image were captured by Photoshop software, and the Optos and Clarus500 dual-field fundus images were obtained. Subsequently, two experienced ophthalmologists performed interpretation and DR grading of the 5 groups of images, respectively. Images with inconsistent grading results were interpreted by a third ophthalmologist and used as the final grading result. In order to avoid the mydriatic dual-field 45° imaging interpretation results as the standard, the consistency and detection rate difference of the two ultra-wide-angle imaging systems in the rapid DR screening results were evaluated. The weighted Kappa ( κ) test was used to analyze the consistency of DR diagnosis between dual-field 45° fundus imaging and Optos and Clarus500 fundus imaging; χ2 test was used to compare the detection rates of DR between different imaging systems. Results:Compared with the dual-field 45° fundus image, the Clarus500 single-field had a higher DR detection rate ( χ2=24.965, P<0.001), and the Optos dual-field fundus image had a lower DR detection rate ( χ2=49.559, P<0.001). Compared with the DR detection rate of dual-field 45° fundus image, Optos single-field fundus image, Clarus500 double-field fundus image had no significant difference ( χ2=2.572, 0.649; P=0.109, 0.421). Compared with Optos, Clarus500 single-field and dual-field fundus images DR detection rate, the difference was statistically significant ( χ2=43.214, 61.216; P<0.001). Consistency assessment of DR grading results: dual-field 45° fundus images and Clarus500 dual-field fundus images ( κ value=0.932, 95% confidence interval ( CI) 0.907-0.956) were highly consistent; dual-field 45° fundus images and Optos single-field fundus images [ κ value=0.474, 95% CI 0.417-0.532], Optos dual-field fundus image ( κ value=0.495, 95% CI 0.438-0.551), Optos dual-field fundus image ( κ value=0.495, 95% CI 0.438-0.551) and Clarus500 dual-field fundus image ( κ value=0.452, 95% CI 0.395-0.506) were moderately consistent; dual-field 45°fundus images and Clarus500 single-field fundus images ( κ value=0.354, 95% CI 0.303-0.403) and Optos single-field fundus images and Clarus500 single-field fundus images ( κ value=0.347, 95% CI 0.287-0.393) showed general agreement. Conclusions:Compared with Optos dual-field fundus image, dual-field 45°fundus image and Clarus500 dual-field fundus image have high consistency in the grading results of DR rapid screening. Compared with Optos single-field fundus image, the detection rate of the DR of Clarus500 single-field fundus image is higher.