1.Expert opinions on operation rules of Morita therapy outpatient service
Jiangbo LI ; Zucheng WANG ; Yuhua CUI ; Yingzhi LU ; Weijie QU ; Haiyin ZHANG ; Fuqiang MAO ; Fengqing QIE ; Wanghong SHI ; Qinfeng ZHANG ; Lingyi PAN ; Ling ZHANG ; Jianzhong LI ; Guangcheng CUI ; Tongxian CHEN ; Xiuqing MA ; Wei RONG ; Jianjun ZHANG ; Qingfang ZHONG ; Yanchi ZHANG ; Boquan ZHANG ; Xinrui WANG ; Wenyou MA ; Qingtao REN ; Yongfa JING ; Huanzhong LIU ; Zhenjian YU ; Laitian ZHAO ; Tianming HAN ; Xue HAN
Chinese Mental Health Journal 2024;38(1):68-72
Morita therapy has been bom for more than 100 years.Inpatient Morita therapy is highly oper-able and easy to master.It can improve many refractory neuroses through four-stage treatment.But more neuroses are treated in outpatient clinics,and Morita therapy cannot be used in hospitalized patients.Therefore,the formula-tion of expert opinions on outpatient operations is particularly important.This paper is based on domestic and for-eign references,and after many discussions by domestic Morita therapy experts,and then drew up the first version of the expert opinions on operation of outpatient Morita therapy.Meanwhile the operation rule of Morita therapy in three stages of outpatient treatment was formulated:in the etiological analysis stage,under the theoretical guidance of Morita therapy,analyze the pathogenic factors,to improve treatment compliance and reduce resistance;during the operating stage,guide patients to engage in constructive and meaningful actions,realizing the achievement of letting nature take its course principle;in the cultivating character and enriching life stage,pay attention to positive infor-mation,expanding the scope and content of actions,improving the ability to adapt to complex life,and preventing recurrence caused by insufficient abilities.It will lay a foundation for the promotion of Morita therapy in domestic outpatient clinics,so that more patients with neurosis and other psychological diseases could receive characteristic Morita therapy treatment in outpatient clinics.
2. Study on the health literacy and related factors of the cancer prevention consciousness among urban residents in China from 2015 to 2017
Chengcheng LIU ; Chunlei SHI ; Jufang SHI ; Ayan MAO ; Huiyao HUANG ; Pei DONG ; Fangzhou BAI ; Yunsi CHEN ; Debin WANG ; Guoxiang LIU ; Xianzhen LIAO ; Yana BAI ; Xiaojie SUN ; Jiansong REN ; Li YANG ; Donghua WEI ; Bingbing SONG ; Haike LEI ; Yuqin LIU ; Yongzhen ZHANG ; Siying REN ; Jinyi ZHOU ; Jialin WANG ; Jiyong GONG ; Lianzheng YU ; Yunyong LIU ; Lin ZHU ; Lanwei GUO ; Youging WANG ; Yutong HE ; Peian LOU ; Bo CAI ; Xiaohua SUN ; Shouling WU ; Xiao QI ; Kai ZHANG ; Ni LI ; Wanghong XU ; Wuqi QIU ; Min DAI ; Wanqing CHEN
Chinese Journal of Preventive Medicine 2020;54(1):47-53
Objective:
To understand the health literacy and relevant factors of cancer prevention consciousness in Chinese urban residents from 2015 to 2017.
Methods:
A cross-sectional survey was conducted in 16 provinces covered by the Cancer Screening Program in Urban China from 2015 to 2017. A total of 32 257 local residents aged ≥18 years old who could understand the investigation procedure were included in the study by using the cluster sampling method and convenient sampling method. All local residents were categorized into four groups, which contained 15 524 community residents, 8 016 cancer risk assessment/screening population, 2 289 cancer patients and 6 428 occupational population, respectively. The self-designed questionnaire was used to collect the information of demographic characteristics and cancer prevention consciousness focusing on nine common risk factors, including smoking, alcohol, fiber food, food in hot temperature or pickled food, chewing betel nut, helicobacter pylori, moldy food, hepatitis B infection, estrogen, and exercise. The logistic regression model was adopted to identify the influencing factors.
Results:
The overall health literacy of the cancer prevention consciousness was 77.4% (24 980 participants), with 77.4% (12 018 participants), 79.9% (6 406 participants), 77.2% (1 766 participants) and 74.5% (4 709 participants) in each group (