Objective To explore the prevalence of 11 efflux pumps in isolates of multidrugresistant Escherichia coli(MDR-ECO). Methods Efflux pumps emrB, emrD , emrE, mdfA, sugE, mdtl,tehA, oqxA, qacE△1, qacE and smr-2 were detected by polymerase chain reaction(PCR)in 20 MDR-ECOs isolated from clinical samples. Results Efflux pumps emrB, emrD, emrE, mdfA, sugE, mdtI, qacE △1, tehA and oqxA were detected, and 8 efflux pumps were found in the same strain. Conclusion Multidrug- resistance in Escherichia coli may be related with efflux pumps.

Objective:To explore the practical value of general anesthesia with non-intubated spontaneous breathing in uniportal thoracoscopic surgery in elderly patients.Methods:Clinical data of 86 elderly patients undergone uniportal thoracoscopy surgery during hospitalization at our hospital between March 2020 and December 2021 were retrospectively reviewed and analyzed.Based on the anesthesia intubation method, they were divided into a non-intubated spontaneous breathing video-assisted thoracic surgery group(NI-VATS group)and a one-lung ventilation video-assisted thoracic surgery group(OLV-VATS group), with 43 cases in each group.Data were compared on the inflammatory indexes, preparation time for anesthesia, time to awakening after anesthesia, intraoperative lung collapse score, mediastinal flutter score, time to postoperative feeding, digestive tract complications, sore throat, postoperative pulmonary atelectasis, and hospitalization time.Results:Compared with the OLV-VATS group, the NI-VATS group had a shorter anesthesia preparation time [(19.8±2.6)min vs.(32.3±4.5)min, t=-15.77, P<0.001]and a shorter time to awakening [(6.8±2.1)min vs.(11.9±2.9)min, t=-9.485, P<0.001], slightly poorer operating field during surgery, an unfavorable lung collapse score [(2.5±0.7) vs.(1.8±0.7) t=4.704, P<0.001], worse mediastinal flutter [(2.1±0.6) vs.(1.3±0.5), t=6.514, P<0.001]. Lower procalcitonin(PCT)[(0.189±0.130)μg/L vs.(0.264±0.123)μg/L, t=-2.744, P=0.007), a shorter time to postoperative feeding [(3.4±1.0)h vs.(5.5±1.0)h, t=-9.55, P<0.001], and lower rates of digestive tract reactions(4.7% vs.20.9%, χ2=5.108, P=0.024)and throat pain(4.7% vs.23.3%, χ2=6.198, P=0.013), and a shorter length of hospital stay [(3.8±0.3)d vs.(4.9±0.8)d, t=-7.266, P<0.001]. Conclusions:For the elderly patients undergoing uniportal thoracoscopic surgery, non-intubated spontaneous breathing may somewhat obstruct the operating field, but it can shorten the time of anesthesia and the time to awakening, does not increase complications from anesthesia and surgery, favors rapid postoperative recovery for patients and therefore should be promoted.

The rapid development of high-throughput sequencing technologies has led to a dramatic decrease in the money and time required for de novo genome sequencing or genome resequencing projects, with new genome sequences constantly released every week. Among such projects, the plethora of updated genome assemblies induces the requirement of version-dependent annotation files and other compatible public dataset for downstream analysis. To handle these tasks in an efficient manner, we developed the reference-based genome assembly and annotation tool (RGAAT), a flexible toolkit for resequencing-based consensus building and annotation update. RGAAT can detect sequence variants with comparable precision, specificity, and sensitivity to GATK and with higher precision and specificity than Freebayes and SAMtools on four DNA-seq datasets tested in this study. RGAAT can also identify sequence variants based on cross-cultivar or cross-version genomic alignments. Unlike GATK and SAMtools/BCFtools, RGAAT builds the consensus sequence by taking into account the true allele frequency. Finally, RGAAT generates a coordinate conversion file between the reference and query genomes using sequence variants and supports annotation file transfer. Compared to the rapid annotation transfer tool (RATT), RGAAT displays better performance characteristics for annotation transfer between different genome assemblies, strains, and species. In addition, RGAAT can be used for genome modification, genome comparison, and coordinate conversion. RGAAT is available at https://sourceforge.net/projects/rgaat/ and https://github.com/wushyer/RGAAT_v2 at no cost.
Genome ; Genomics ; High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing ; methods ; standards ; Humans ; Reference Standards ; Sequence Analysis, DNA ; methods ; standards ; Software