1.Development of Korean Version of Developmental Coordination Disorder Questionnaire (DCDQ-K)
JooYeon KO ; WanHee LEE ; JungJee WOON ; YoungA KIM
Journal of Korean Physical Therapy 2020;32(1):44-51
Purpose:
This study translated the developmental coordination disorder questionnaire’07 (DCDQ’07) into Korean and investigated the psychometric properties of the Korean DCDQ (DCDQ-K) using validation processes.
Methods:
The subjects were 300 parents with typically developing children aged 5-15 years (162 girls and 138 boys, mean age 9.24 years, SD 2.59) across the country. To develop the Korean DCDQ, a forward-backward-original author feedback-panel meeting-pilot study with parents was done. The internal consistency, test-retest reliability performed two weeks apart, content validity, discriminative validity, convergent validity, and constructive validity were examined with the pre-version of the DCDQ-K.
Results:
Approximately 15.33% of the subjects were probably shown DCD using DCDQ-K. Significant differences in age and province were observed in the DCDQ-K total score. The reliabilities and validities were good in the DCDQ-K.
Conclusion
The DCDQ-K is a reasonable screening tool for DCD children.
2.Development of Korean Version of Developmental Coordination Disorder Questionnaire (DCDQ-K)
JooYeon KO ; WanHee LEE ; JungJee WOON ; YoungA KIM
Journal of Korean Physical Therapy 2020;32(1):44-51
Purpose:
This study translated the developmental coordination disorder questionnaire’07 (DCDQ’07) into Korean and investigated the psychometric properties of the Korean DCDQ (DCDQ-K) using validation processes.
Methods:
The subjects were 300 parents with typically developing children aged 5-15 years (162 girls and 138 boys, mean age 9.24 years, SD 2.59) across the country. To develop the Korean DCDQ, a forward-backward-original author feedback-panel meeting-pilot study with parents was done. The internal consistency, test-retest reliability performed two weeks apart, content validity, discriminative validity, convergent validity, and constructive validity were examined with the pre-version of the DCDQ-K.
Results:
Approximately 15.33% of the subjects were probably shown DCD using DCDQ-K. Significant differences in age and province were observed in the DCDQ-K total score. The reliabilities and validities were good in the DCDQ-K.
Conclusion
The DCDQ-K is a reasonable screening tool for DCD children.