Education, Medical, Graduate ; standards ; General Surgery ; education ; Humans ; Singapore ; Workload ; statistics & numerical data

INTRODUCTIONLocal data comparing laparoscopic appendicectomy (LA) and open appendicectomy (OA) is lacking. We perform a cost and outcome comparison between LA and OA.

MATERIALS AND METHODSA retrospective review of all appendicectomies performed for suspected appendicitis from July 2010 to December 2010 was conducted. Patient demographics, duration of surgery, complication rates, total cost of stay (COS) and length of stay (LOS) were compared between LA and OA.

RESULTSA total of 198 patients underwent appendicectomy during the duration of study; 82 LA and 116 OA. There were 115 males (58.1%) and 83 females (41.9%). Median age was 33 years. Patients who underwent LA were significantly younger (P <0.001) with a greater proportion of females (P <0.0001) and were more likely to be negative appendicectomies (18.3% vs. 6.9%, P = 0.023). Duration of surgery was significantly longer in LA patients (86 min vs. 74 min, P = 0.003). LOS in the LA group was shorter by 1.3 days compared to OA (2.0 days vs. 3.3 days, P <0.0001). The differences in operative duration and LOS between LA and OA remained significant on multivariate analysis (P = 0.001 and P = 0.008, respectively). The COS (P = 0.359), wound infection rates (P = 0.528) and complication rates (P = 0.131) were not significantly different between the 2 groups.

CONCLUSIONLA is associated with a shorter LOS while its cost is equivalent to OA. From the perspective of utilisation of healthcare resources, LA appears to be superior.

Adolescent ; Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Appendectomy ; economics ; methods ; Costs and Cost Analysis ; Female ; Humans ; Laparoscopy ; Length of Stay ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Retrospective Studies ; Treatment Outcome ; Young Adult

INTRODUCTIONAcute pancreatitis appears to be less prevalent in multi-ethnic Southeast Asia, where the aetiology also appears to be influenced by ethnicity. As with acute pancreatitis elsewhere, however, pancreatic necrosis is a cause of significant mortality and the aim of this study was to review our institutional experience with pancreatic necrosectomy.

MATERIALS AND METHODSThe records of all patients who underwent pancreatic necrosectomy from January 2000 to December 2004 were analysed. Indications for surgery were the presence of infected necrosis, unresolving sepsis attributable to ongoing pancreatitis or the presence of gas in the pancreatic bed on imaging. Surgical debridement was achieved by debridement with closure over drains or by debridement with open packing.

RESULTSThe cohort comprised 14 of 373 patients admitted for acute pancreatitis (3.8%), with an overall mortality rate of 29%. All patients had infected necrosis with positive bacteriological cultures. Eight patients (57%) underwent debridement with closure over drains and 6 patients (43%) underwent debridement with open packing. All mortalities occurred in patients who underwent open packing, who were also associated with a higher mean Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II score. The mortality rate in patients who underwent debridement less than 4 weeks after admission was 33% (2 of 6), compared with 25% (2 of 8) in patients who underwent debridement after 4 weeks. There were no mortalities in patients operated on after 6 weeks.

CONCLUSIONSurgical debridement with closure of drains and a policy of performing delayed necrosectomy are viable in our population.

APACHE ; Adult ; Aged ; Asia, Southeastern ; epidemiology ; Cohort Studies ; Debridement ; methods ; Drainage ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Pancreatectomy ; methods ; Pancreatitis, Acute Necrotizing ; diagnosis ; mortality ; surgery ; Time Factors ; Tomography, X-Ray Computed

Asian People ; Humans ; Prevalence ; Stereotyping

Humans ; COVID-19/epidemiology* ; Operating Rooms ; SARS-CoV-2 ; Learning ; Delivery of Health Care