1.Analysis of XRCC1 and TYMS gene polymorphism test results of resected non-small cell lung cancer
Yong CUI ; Bingqun WU ; Xinchun DUAN ; Guan SHI ; Dong CHANG ; Min GONG
International Journal of Surgery 2015;42(1):26-29,后插1
Objective To discusses the clinical significance of XRCC1 399 and TYMS 5'-translation section enhancement subsequence polymorphism in guidance the postoperative individual chemotherapy for patients with resected non-small cell lung cancer.Methods Retrospectively analyze the results of 150 cases from February 2010to June 2014.Statistical analysis with SPSS 21.0.Results Three of the most common gene type of XRCC1 399 is Arg/Arg(58.7%),Arg/Gln(36.7%) and Gln/Gln(4.6%),respectively.Three of the most common gene type of TYMS is 3R/3R (70.7%),2R/3R (25.3%) and 2R/2R (4.0%),respectively.Conclusion In resected non-small cell lung cancer,XRCC1 399 Arg/Arg genotype is the most common,followed by Arg/Gln type.At the sarne time,TYMS gene type 3R/3R accounted for more than 70%,especially higher percentage of in adenocarcinoma.Neither of these two gene polymorphism is recommended as marker to guide the postoperative individual chemotherapy.
2.Variations in Serum CEA and CYFRA21-1 Levels Before and After Surgery Facilitate Prognosis of Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Patients
DUAN XINCHUN ; CUI YONG ; GONG MIN ; TIAN FENG ; SHI GUAN ; WU BINGQUN ; LIU MINGLIANG ; GUO JIAYUN ; KONG YUANYUAN
Chinese Journal of Lung Cancer 2015;(6):358-364
Background and objectiveSerum carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) and the soluble fragment of cyto-keratin 19 (CYFAR21-1) are important tumor markers (TMs) in the preoperative examination of patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, the prognostic role of these markers in NSCLC patients remains controversial. hTe aim of the study was to investigate the clinical signiifcance of serum CEA variances and CYFAR21-1 levels for the prognosis of NSCLC patients following surgery.MethodshTis retrospective study investigated the clinical records and follow-up sessions of 175 patients with NSCLC who accepted surgery and adjuvant chemotherapy. Patients were subdivided into groups based on serum CEA and CYFAR21-1 levels. Survival analysis was conducted usingKaplan-Meier method for each group. hTe prognostic fac-tor was evaluated usingCox proportional hazards model.Results hTe overall survival (OS) of patients with high preopera-tive CEA or CYFAR21-1 levels was lower than that of patients with normal preoperative CEA or CYFAR21-1 levels. hTe OS displayed a signiifcant difference (P=0.001) between groups with high and normal preoperative CYFAR21-1. Compared with groups exhibiting normal preoperative and postoperative levels of CEA or CYFAR21-1, the OS was shorter for groups with high preoperative and postoperative levels of CEA or CYFAR21-1. hTe difference of the paired groups was signiifcant (P<0.05). Compared with the groups with normal preoperative and postoperative levels of CEA and CYFAR21-1, the OS was lower for the groups with high preoperative and postoperative levels of CEA and CYFAR21-1, which indicated a signiifcant difference (P<0.001). hTe CEACYFAR211 (HHHH), CEACYFAR211 (NNHH), CYFAR21-1 (HH), CEA (HH), and male genderwere identiifed as independent prognostic factors (P<0.05).ConclusionhTis study suggested that the prognosis of NSCLC patients was not signiifcantly satisfactory if preoperative and postoperative level of serum CEA or CYFAR21-1 was higher than standard value, especially if the preoperative and postoperative levels of CYFAR21-1 and CEA were higher than the standard values. hTe measurement of preoperative and postoperative levels of CYFAR21-1 and CEA proved helpful for the prognosis of patients with NSCLC.
3.Comparison of the Survival Time in the Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Patients with Different Organ Metastasis.
Bingqun WU ; Shenhai WEI ; Jintao TIAN ; Xiaoping SONG ; Pengcheng HU ; Yong CUI
Chinese Journal of Lung Cancer 2019;22(2):105-110
BACKGROUND:
The purpose of this study is to compare the survival time of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with different organ metastasis. Among all cancers, the morbidity and mortality of lung cancer is the highest worldwide, which may caused by local recurrence and distant metastasis, and the location of metastasis may predict the prognosis of patients.
METHODS:
A total of 117,542 patients with NSCLC diagnosed between 2010 and 2014 were enrolled from Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Result (SEER) databases, and the relationship between distant metastasis and survival time was retrospectively analyzed.
RESULTS:
Of all the 117,542 patients diagnosed with non-small cell lung cancer, 42,071 (35.8%) patients had different degrees of distant metastasis during their medical history, including 26,932 single organ metastases and 15,139 multiple organ metastases, accounting for 64.0% and 36.0% of the metastatic patients respectively. Compared with patients with no metastasis, whose median survival time was 21 months, the median survival time of patients with metastases was 7 months (lung), 6 months (brain), 5 months (bone), 4 months (liver), and 3 months (multiple organ) respectively, and the difference was significant (P<0.001, except liver vs multiple organ P=0.650); Most patients with NSCLC (88.4%) eventually died of lung cancer.
CONCLUSIONS
Distant metastasis of NSCLC patients indicates poor prognosis. In NSCLC patients with single organ metastasis, the prognosis of lung metastasis is the best, and liver metastasis is the worst, and multiple organ metastasis is worse than single organ metastasis.
Aged
;
Aged, 80 and over
;
Bone Neoplasms
;
mortality
;
secondary
;
Brain Neoplasms
;
mortality
;
secondary
;
Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung
;
mortality
;
pathology
;
Female
;
Humans
;
Liver Neoplasms
;
mortality
;
secondary
;
Lung Neoplasms
;
mortality
;
pathology
;
Male
;
Middle Aged
;
Neoplasm Metastasis
;
Neoplasm Staging
;
Prognosis
;
Retrospective Studies