2.Is Older Age a Contraindication for Single-Level Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion?
Jwalant Y. PATEL ; Vishal G. KUNDNANI ; Bansari CHAWADA
Asian Spine Journal 2021;15(4):447-454
Retrospective cohort. This study’s primary objective was to compare the clinico-radiological outcomes and incidence of perioperative complications of transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) at lower lumbar levels for elderly and younger patients. The secondary objective was to evaluate the effect of age on clinical outcomes and patient satisfaction in the two groups. The lumbar interbody fusion surgery in elder age has been reported to produce a higher complication rate and suboptimal results. Literature evaluating efficacy and safety of TLIF in elderly population is scanty. The effect of age on clinical outcome and the overall patient satisfaction after TLIF has been understudied. This retrospective study was conducted from 2011 to 2017 with 121 patients, who underwent TLIF and were divided into two cohorts based on age (group A, >65 years and group B, <65 years). Perioperative clinical/radiological parameters, postoperative complications, and satisfactory outcomes were evaluated in both groups. A statistical analysis between two matched groups was performed with logistic regression analysis and Student t-test. The mean age was 73.8±4.5 years in group A and 47.3±12.7 years in group B. There was no statistical difference in surgical time ( In judiciously selected patients with proper preoperative risk assessment and optimized medical co-morbidities, TLIF surgery can have successful results, in terms of clinical outcome and satisfaction, in the elderly. Older age should not be a contraindication for TLIF in patients with degenerative lumbar disease.
3.Is Older Age a Contraindication for Single-Level Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion?
Jwalant Y. PATEL ; Vishal G. KUNDNANI ; Bansari CHAWADA
Asian Spine Journal 2021;15(4):447-454
Retrospective cohort. This study’s primary objective was to compare the clinico-radiological outcomes and incidence of perioperative complications of transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) at lower lumbar levels for elderly and younger patients. The secondary objective was to evaluate the effect of age on clinical outcomes and patient satisfaction in the two groups. The lumbar interbody fusion surgery in elder age has been reported to produce a higher complication rate and suboptimal results. Literature evaluating efficacy and safety of TLIF in elderly population is scanty. The effect of age on clinical outcome and the overall patient satisfaction after TLIF has been understudied. This retrospective study was conducted from 2011 to 2017 with 121 patients, who underwent TLIF and were divided into two cohorts based on age (group A, >65 years and group B, <65 years). Perioperative clinical/radiological parameters, postoperative complications, and satisfactory outcomes were evaluated in both groups. A statistical analysis between two matched groups was performed with logistic regression analysis and Student t-test. The mean age was 73.8±4.5 years in group A and 47.3±12.7 years in group B. There was no statistical difference in surgical time ( In judiciously selected patients with proper preoperative risk assessment and optimized medical co-morbidities, TLIF surgery can have successful results, in terms of clinical outcome and satisfaction, in the elderly. Older age should not be a contraindication for TLIF in patients with degenerative lumbar disease.
4.Study of Patients with Bilateral Knee Osteoarthritis Undergoing Total Knee Replacement Procedure with Coexisting Lumbar Spondylosis Symptoms
Sanjay Bhalchandra LONDHE ; Ravi Vinod SHAH ; Meghana PATWARDHAN ; Amit Pankaj DOSHI ; Shubhankar Sanjay LONDHE ; Kavita SUBHEDAR ; Vishal KUNDNANI ; Jwalant PATEL
Asian Spine Journal 2021;15(6):825-830
Methods:
The study included 200 patients (164 females, 36 males) undergoing primary TKR. Follow-up was performed at 4 weeks, 3, 6, 12, and 24 months. Lumbar spine and knee symptom improvements were assessed using the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and Oxford Knee Score, respectively.
Results:
All 200 patients undergoing bilateral TKR presented with radiographic lumbar spine degenerative pathology; 60% (n=120) of the patients presented with moderate to severe clinical symptoms of lumbar spondylosis, including 54% (n=108) with degenerative lumbar spondylosis and lumbar canal stenosis and 6% (n=12) with degenerative spondylolisthesis. Of the 120 patients who presented with lumbar spine problems, 90% (n=108) reported improvement in their symptoms; the ODI score improved from 42.5%±4.1% preoperative score to 15.6%±2.3% postoperative score (p -value<0.001). Of the 12 patients with no improvement, 10 patients underwent percutaneous procedures for their lumbar spine pathology with good results, one patient underwent surgery, and one declined any intervention.
Conclusions
A significant number of patients (60%) undergoing bilateral TKR also present with symptomatic lumbar spine problems. Patients with mild to moderate lumbar spine degenerative symptoms and no associated severe radiating pain on activity are more likely to experience relief of their symptoms post-TKR.
5.Minimally Invasive Microscope-Assisted Stand-Alone Transarticular Screw Fixation without Gallie Supplementation in the Management of Mobile Atlantoaxial Instability
Tarun DUSAD ; Vishal KUNDNANI ; Shumayou DUTTA ; Ankit PATEL ; Gaurav MEHTA ; Mahendra SINGH
Asian Spine Journal 2018;12(4):710-719
STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective study. PURPOSE: To evaluate the clinico-radiological efficacy of stand-alone minimally invasive transarticular screw (MIS-TAS) fixation without supplemental Gallie fixation in the management of mobile C1–C2 instability. OVERVIEW OF LITERATURE: Data evaluating the efficacy and feasibility of MIS-TAS in the literature is scanty. METHODS: Patients with mobile atlantoaxial instability and >2 years follow-up were included and managed by stand-alone TAS fixation using the Magerl technique and morselized allograft without additional fixation. Patient demographics and intra-operative parameters were noted. Clinical parameters (Visual Analog Scale [VAS] and Oswestry Disability Index [ODI]), neurology (modified Japanese Orthopaedic Association [mJOA]), and radiological factors (anterior atlanto-dens interval and space available for cord) were evaluated pre and postoperatively. Computed tomography (CT) was performed in patients who did not show interspinous fusion on X-ray at 1 year, to verify intra-articular fusion. Statistical analysis was performed using IBM SPSS ver. 20.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA); the Student t-test and analysis of variance were used to assess statistical significance (p <0.05). RESULTS: A total of 82 consecutive cases (three males, one female; mean age, 36.26±5.78 years) were evaluated. In total, 163 TASs were placed. Significant improvement was noticed in clinical (mean preoperative VAS=7.2±2.19, postoperative VAS=3.3±1.12; mean preoperative ODI=78.3±4.83, postoperative ODI=34.05±3.26) and neurological features (mean preoperative mJOA=14.73±2.68, postoperative mJOA=17.5±2.21). Radiological evidence of fusion was noted in 97.5% cases at final follow-up. Seventeen patients were found to have no interspinous fusions upon X-rays, but CT revealed facet fusion in all patients except in two. Inadvertent vertebral artery injury was noted in three cases. CONCLUSIONS: Stand-alone TAS fixation with morselized allograft provides excellent radiological and clinical outcomes. The addition of a supplementary tension band and structural graft are not essential. This provides the opportunity to avoid the complications associated with graft harvesting and wiring.
Allografts
;
Asian Continental Ancestry Group
;
Atlanto-Axial Joint
;
Bone Wires
;
Demography
;
Female
;
Follow-Up Studies
;
Humans
;
Joint Instability
;
Male
;
Neurology
;
Retrospective Studies
;
Transplants
;
Vertebral Artery
6.Response to: Study of Patients with Bilateral Knee Osteoarthritis Undergoing Total Knee Replacement Procedure with Coexisting Lumbar Spondylosis Symptoms
Sanjay Bhalchandra LONDHE ; Ravi Vinod SHAH ; Meghana PATWARDHAN ; Amit Pankaj DOSHI ; Shubhankar Sanjay LONDHE ; Kavita SUBHEDAR ; Vishal KUNDNANI ; Jwalant PATEL
Asian Spine Journal 2022;16(2):304-306
7.Is Teriparatide Superior in Treating Osteoporotic Vertebral Compression Fractures in Comparison to Bisphosphonates Treatment Alone: A 2-Year Retrospective Analysis
Vishnu Vikraman NAIR ; Vishal KUNDNANI ; Abhijith SHETTY ; Manikant ANAND ; Mukul JAIN ; Nikhil DEWNANY
Asian Spine Journal 2023;17(6):1098-1107
Methods:
In a 24-month follow-up retrospective study, 191 patients with osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures were randomly assigned to the bisphosphonate group (n=104) or the teriparatide group (n=87), with patients opting for their treatment between January 2016 and October 2020. Demographic data and patient-reported outcomes scores, including the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), union rates, and kyphosis progression, were assessed at baseline, 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years after treatment.
Results:
Both groups had a significant decrease in VAS, from 8.38±0.74 to 3.15±1.40 in the bisphosphonate group and from 8.49±0.73 to 1.11±0.31 in the teriparatide group. The ODI scores reduced significantly at 2-year follow-ups, recording 25.02±13.94 and 15.11±2.17 in the bisphosphonate and teriparatide groups, respectively. Risks of nonunion development were slightly higher at 11.53% in the bisphosphonate group and 8.63% in the teriparatide group required operative intervention. The kyphosis progression angles were also significantly lower in the teriparatide group (4.97°±0.78°) than in the bisphosphonate group (8.09°±1.25°).
Conclusions
Over time, numerous studies have demonstrated the efficacy of bisphosphonates and teriparatide in ameliorating pain. In this study, the efficacy of teriparatide surpassed that of bisphosphonates in certain aspects, such as the initial 6-month union rates and reduction in the progression of segmental kyphosis. However, bisphosphonates and teriparatide yield similar and favorable union rates at 1 year and final follow-up.
8.Superior Facet Joint Violations in Single Level Minimally Invasive and Open Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Comparative Study
Jwalant Y. PATEL ; Vishal G. KUNDNANI ; Zahirabbas Imtiyaz MERCHANT ; Sanyam JAIN ; Neilakuo KIRE
Asian Spine Journal 2020;14(1):25-32
Methods:
In total, 225 cases (450 top screws; MIS-TIFL, 120; OPEN-TILF, 105) undergoing single-level lower lumbar fusion were included in the study. Postoperative computed tomography grading system was used to evaluate iatrogenic SFV. Patient and surgical factors such as age, body mass index, top-screw level, side of the top screw, depth of the spine, and superior facet joint angle (SFA) were analyzed in iatrogenic SFV and non-violation groups to determine their influence on iatrogenic SFV. The clinical outcomes in both groups were assessed preoperatively and postoperatively.
Results:
The overall incidence of iatrogenic SFV and high-grade violations was higher in MIS-TLIF (41.25%) than in OPEN-TLIF (30.4%). In both groups, bivariate analysis showed a significantly greater incidence of the iatrogenic SFV in patients aged <60 years and those with obesity, top pedicle screws at L4, right-sided top screws, SFA >35°, and depth of the spine >50 mm.
Conclusions
This study demonstrated that the incidence of iatrogenic SFV is greater in MIS-TLIF than in OPEN-TLIF at a single lower lumbar level. MIS-TLIF is effective for lumbar degenerative disease; however, the incidence of iatrogenic SFV was higher. Patient and surgical factors must be considered to protect the facet joints in both TLIF methods to avoid ASD.