Ultrasound (US) is a widely accessible and extensively used tool for breast imaging. It is commonly used as an additional screening tool, especially for women with dense breast tissue. Advances in artificial intelligence (AI) have led to the development of various AI systems that assist radiologists in identifying and diagnosing breast lesions using US. This article provides an overview of the background and supporting evidence for the use of AI in hand held breast US. It discusses the impact of AI on clinical workflow, covering breast cancer detection, diagnosis, prediction of molecular subtypes, evaluation of axillary lymph node status, and response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Additionally, the article highlights the potential significance of AI in breast US for low and middle income countries.

Ultrasound (US) is a widely accessible and extensively used tool for breast imaging. It is commonly used as an additional screening tool, especially for women with dense breast tissue. Advances in artificial intelligence (AI) have led to the development of various AI systems that assist radiologists in identifying and diagnosing breast lesions using US. This article provides an overview of the background and supporting evidence for the use of AI in hand held breast US. It discusses the impact of AI on clinical workflow, covering breast cancer detection, diagnosis, prediction of molecular subtypes, evaluation of axillary lymph node status, and response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Additionally, the article highlights the potential significance of AI in breast US for low and middle income countries.

Ultrasound (US) is a widely accessible and extensively used tool for breast imaging. It is commonly used as an additional screening tool, especially for women with dense breast tissue. Advances in artificial intelligence (AI) have led to the development of various AI systems that assist radiologists in identifying and diagnosing breast lesions using US. This article provides an overview of the background and supporting evidence for the use of AI in hand held breast US. It discusses the impact of AI on clinical workflow, covering breast cancer detection, diagnosis, prediction of molecular subtypes, evaluation of axillary lymph node status, and response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Additionally, the article highlights the potential significance of AI in breast US for low and middle income countries.

Ultrasound (US) is a widely accessible and extensively used tool for breast imaging. It is commonly used as an additional screening tool, especially for women with dense breast tissue. Advances in artificial intelligence (AI) have led to the development of various AI systems that assist radiologists in identifying and diagnosing breast lesions using US. This article provides an overview of the background and supporting evidence for the use of AI in hand held breast US. It discusses the impact of AI on clinical workflow, covering breast cancer detection, diagnosis, prediction of molecular subtypes, evaluation of axillary lymph node status, and response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Additionally, the article highlights the potential significance of AI in breast US for low and middle income countries.

Ultrasound (US) is a widely accessible and extensively used tool for breast imaging. It is commonly used as an additional screening tool, especially for women with dense breast tissue. Advances in artificial intelligence (AI) have led to the development of various AI systems that assist radiologists in identifying and diagnosing breast lesions using US. This article provides an overview of the background and supporting evidence for the use of AI in hand held breast US. It discusses the impact of AI on clinical workflow, covering breast cancer detection, diagnosis, prediction of molecular subtypes, evaluation of axillary lymph node status, and response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Additionally, the article highlights the potential significance of AI in breast US for low and middle income countries.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to describe the breast ultrasonography (US) features and to investigate whether performing a core biopsy is warranted in young women having palpable solid breast masses. METHODS: A total of 76 solid palpable masses in 68 consecutive women (< or =25 years old) underwent tissue diagnosis by percutaneous core biopsy. Two radiologists, who were blinded to the clinical history and histopathology, independently evaluated the US features according to Breast Imaging-Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) lexicon. The frequency of benign and malignant descriptor terms that were used to characterize the lesions were compared to the final pathology. RESULTS: All 76 palpable solid masses yielded benign pathology. On the US, the shape of the mass was described by radiologists 1 and 2 as oval or round (63.2% and 71.1%), margin as circumscribed (68.4% and 77.6%) and orientation as parallel (85.5% and 90.8%); the frequency of using all three benign descriptors was 61.8% and 68.5%, respectively. Suspicious descriptors were used less frequently by radiologists 1 and 2 including irregular shape (9.2% and 13.1%), non-circumscribed margin (31.6% and 22.4%) and non-parallel orientation (14.5% and 9.2%); the frequency of using all three suspicious descriptors was 9.2% and 11.8%, respectively. CONCLUSION: Despite the variable US features, breast malignancy seems extremely low in 25 years or younger women for palpable breast lesions. Using the BI-RADS lexicon, US accurately predicted benignity in about two thirds of our patients, supporting US surveillance as a safe alternative to invasive tissue sampling in this setting.
Biopsy ; Breast Diseases ; Breast* ; Diagnosis ; Female ; Humans ; Information Systems ; Pathology ; Subject Headings ; Ultrasonography ; Ultrasonography, Mammary ; Young Adult

Purpose: This study aimed to evaluate our institution's experience in using artificial intelligence (AI) decision support (DS) as part of the clinical workflow to triage patients with Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) 3 sonographic lesions whose follow-up was delayed during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, against subsequent imaging and/or pathologic follow-up results. Methods: This retrospective study included patients with a BI-RADS category 3 (i.e., probably benign) breast ultrasound assessment from August 2019–December 2019 whose follow-up was delayed during the COVID-19 pandemic and whose breast ultrasounds were re-reviewed using Koios DS Breast AI as part of the clinical workflow for triaging these patients. The output of Koios DS was compared with the true outcome of a presence or absence of breast cancer defined by resolution/stability on imaging follow-up for at least 2 years or pathology results. Results: The study included 161 women (mean age, 52 years) with 221 BI-RADS category 3 sonographic lesions. Of the 221 lesions, there were two confirmed cancers (0.9% malignancy rate). Koios DS assessed 112/221 lesions (50.7%) as benign, 42/221 lesions (19.0%) as probably benign, 64/221 lesions (29.0%) as suspicious, and 3/221 lesions (1.4%) as probably malignant. Koios DS had a sensitivity of 100% (2/2; 95% confidence interval [CI], 16% to 100%), specificity of 70% (154/219; 95% CI, 64% to 76%), negative predictive value of 100% (154/154; 95% CI, 98% to 100%), and false-positive rate of 30% (65/219; 95% CI, 24% to 36%). Conclusion When many follow-up appointments are delayed, e.g., natural disaster, or scenarios where resources are limited, breast ultrasound AI DS can help triage patients with probably benign breast ultrasounds.

Purpose: This study aimed to evaluate our institution's experience in using artificial intelligence (AI) decision support (DS) as part of the clinical workflow to triage patients with Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) 3 sonographic lesions whose follow-up was delayed during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, against subsequent imaging and/or pathologic follow-up results. Methods: This retrospective study included patients with a BI-RADS category 3 (i.e., probably benign) breast ultrasound assessment from August 2019–December 2019 whose follow-up was delayed during the COVID-19 pandemic and whose breast ultrasounds were re-reviewed using Koios DS Breast AI as part of the clinical workflow for triaging these patients. The output of Koios DS was compared with the true outcome of a presence or absence of breast cancer defined by resolution/stability on imaging follow-up for at least 2 years or pathology results. Results: The study included 161 women (mean age, 52 years) with 221 BI-RADS category 3 sonographic lesions. Of the 221 lesions, there were two confirmed cancers (0.9% malignancy rate). Koios DS assessed 112/221 lesions (50.7%) as benign, 42/221 lesions (19.0%) as probably benign, 64/221 lesions (29.0%) as suspicious, and 3/221 lesions (1.4%) as probably malignant. Koios DS had a sensitivity of 100% (2/2; 95% confidence interval [CI], 16% to 100%), specificity of 70% (154/219; 95% CI, 64% to 76%), negative predictive value of 100% (154/154; 95% CI, 98% to 100%), and false-positive rate of 30% (65/219; 95% CI, 24% to 36%). Conclusion When many follow-up appointments are delayed, e.g., natural disaster, or scenarios where resources are limited, breast ultrasound AI DS can help triage patients with probably benign breast ultrasounds.

Purpose: This study aimed to evaluate our institution's experience in using artificial intelligence (AI) decision support (DS) as part of the clinical workflow to triage patients with Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) 3 sonographic lesions whose follow-up was delayed during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, against subsequent imaging and/or pathologic follow-up results. Methods: This retrospective study included patients with a BI-RADS category 3 (i.e., probably benign) breast ultrasound assessment from August 2019–December 2019 whose follow-up was delayed during the COVID-19 pandemic and whose breast ultrasounds were re-reviewed using Koios DS Breast AI as part of the clinical workflow for triaging these patients. The output of Koios DS was compared with the true outcome of a presence or absence of breast cancer defined by resolution/stability on imaging follow-up for at least 2 years or pathology results. Results: The study included 161 women (mean age, 52 years) with 221 BI-RADS category 3 sonographic lesions. Of the 221 lesions, there were two confirmed cancers (0.9% malignancy rate). Koios DS assessed 112/221 lesions (50.7%) as benign, 42/221 lesions (19.0%) as probably benign, 64/221 lesions (29.0%) as suspicious, and 3/221 lesions (1.4%) as probably malignant. Koios DS had a sensitivity of 100% (2/2; 95% confidence interval [CI], 16% to 100%), specificity of 70% (154/219; 95% CI, 64% to 76%), negative predictive value of 100% (154/154; 95% CI, 98% to 100%), and false-positive rate of 30% (65/219; 95% CI, 24% to 36%). Conclusion When many follow-up appointments are delayed, e.g., natural disaster, or scenarios where resources are limited, breast ultrasound AI DS can help triage patients with probably benign breast ultrasounds.

Purpose: This study aimed to evaluate our institution's experience in using artificial intelligence (AI) decision support (DS) as part of the clinical workflow to triage patients with Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) 3 sonographic lesions whose follow-up was delayed during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, against subsequent imaging and/or pathologic follow-up results. Methods: This retrospective study included patients with a BI-RADS category 3 (i.e., probably benign) breast ultrasound assessment from August 2019–December 2019 whose follow-up was delayed during the COVID-19 pandemic and whose breast ultrasounds were re-reviewed using Koios DS Breast AI as part of the clinical workflow for triaging these patients. The output of Koios DS was compared with the true outcome of a presence or absence of breast cancer defined by resolution/stability on imaging follow-up for at least 2 years or pathology results. Results: The study included 161 women (mean age, 52 years) with 221 BI-RADS category 3 sonographic lesions. Of the 221 lesions, there were two confirmed cancers (0.9% malignancy rate). Koios DS assessed 112/221 lesions (50.7%) as benign, 42/221 lesions (19.0%) as probably benign, 64/221 lesions (29.0%) as suspicious, and 3/221 lesions (1.4%) as probably malignant. Koios DS had a sensitivity of 100% (2/2; 95% confidence interval [CI], 16% to 100%), specificity of 70% (154/219; 95% CI, 64% to 76%), negative predictive value of 100% (154/154; 95% CI, 98% to 100%), and false-positive rate of 30% (65/219; 95% CI, 24% to 36%). Conclusion When many follow-up appointments are delayed, e.g., natural disaster, or scenarios where resources are limited, breast ultrasound AI DS can help triage patients with probably benign breast ultrasounds.