1.Towards Steroid-Free Immunosuppression after Liver Transplantation.
Victor M ZAYDFUDIM ; Shawn J PELLETIER
Gut and Liver 2016;10(4):495-496
No abstract available.
Immunosuppression*
;
Liver Transplantation*
;
Liver*
2.IgG4-Associated Cholangitis Can Mimic Hilar Cholangiocarcinoma.
Victor M ZAYDFUDIM ; Andrew Y WANG ; Eduard E DE LANGE ; Zimin ZHAO ; Christopher A MOSKALUK ; Todd W BAUER ; Reid B ADAMS
Gut and Liver 2015;9(4):556-560
IgG4-associated cholangitis can mimic hilar cholangiocarcinoma. Previously reported patients with IgG4-associated cholangitis mimicking cholangiocarcinoma had elevated serum IgG4 levels and long-segment biliary strictures. However, in the absence of other diagnostic criteria for malignancy, IgG4-associated cholangitis should remain a consideration among patients with normal serum IgG4 and a hilar mass suspicious for cholangiocarcinoma. The presence of a hilar mass and a malignant-appearing biliary stricture in two patients with normal serum IgG4 prompted further evaluation and subsequent concomitant liver and bile duct resection and reconstruction. The diagnosis of IgG4-associated cholangitis was established during the pathologic evaluation of the resected specimens. IgG4-associated cholangitis is a known imitator of hilar cholangiocarcinoma and should be considered in the differential diagnosis even among serologically IgG4-negative patients with a hilar mass prior to operative resection.
Aged
;
Bile Ducts/pathology/surgery
;
Cholangitis/blood/*diagnosis
;
Diagnosis, Differential
;
Humans
;
Immunoglobulin G/*blood
;
Klatskin Tumor/blood/*diagnosis
;
Liver/pathology/surgery
;
Male
3.Associations between income and survival in cholangiocarcinoma:A comprehensive subtype-based analysis
Calvin X. GENG ; Anuragh R. GUDUR ; Jagannath KADIYALA ; Daniel S. STRAND ; Vanessa M. SHAMI ; Andrew Y. WANG ; Alexander PODBOY ; Tri M. LE ; Matthew REILLEY ; Victor ZAYDFUDIM ; Ross C. D. BUERLEIN
Annals of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery 2024;28(2):144-154
Background:
s/Aims: Socioeconomic determinants of health are incompletely characterized in cholangiocarcinoma (CCA). We assessed how socioeconomic status influences initial treatment decisions and survival outcomes in patients with CCA, additionally performing multiple sub-analyses based on anatomic location of the primary tumor.
Methods:
Observational study using the 2018 submission of the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER)-18 Database. In total, 5,476 patients from 2004−2015 with a CCA were separated based on median household income (MHI) into low income (< 25th percentile of MHI) and high income (> 25th percentile of MHI) groups. Seventy-three percent of patients had complete follow up data, and were included in survival analyses. Survival and treatment outcomes were calculated using R-studio.
Results:
When all cases of CCA were included, the high-income group was more likely than the low-income to receive surgery, chemotherapy, and local tumor destruction modalities. Initial treatment modality based on income differed significantly between tumor locations. Patients of lower income had higher overall and cancer-specific mortality at 2 and 5 years. Non-cancer mortality was similar between the groups. Survival differences identified in the overall cohort were maintained in the intrahepatic CCA subgroup. No differences between income groups were noted in cancer-specific or overall mortality for perihilar tumors, with variable differences in the distal cohort.
Conclusions
Lower income was associated with higher rates of cancer-specific mortality and lower rates of surgical resection in CCA. There were significant differences in treatment selection and outcomes between intrahepatic, perihilar, and distal tumors. Population-based strategies aimed at identifying possible etiologies for these disparities are paramount to improving patient outcomes.
4.Associations between income and survival in cholangiocarcinoma:A comprehensive subtype-based analysis
Calvin X. GENG ; Anuragh R. GUDUR ; Jagannath KADIYALA ; Daniel S. STRAND ; Vanessa M. SHAMI ; Andrew Y. WANG ; Alexander PODBOY ; Tri M. LE ; Matthew REILLEY ; Victor ZAYDFUDIM ; Ross C. D. BUERLEIN
Annals of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery 2024;28(2):144-154
Background:
s/Aims: Socioeconomic determinants of health are incompletely characterized in cholangiocarcinoma (CCA). We assessed how socioeconomic status influences initial treatment decisions and survival outcomes in patients with CCA, additionally performing multiple sub-analyses based on anatomic location of the primary tumor.
Methods:
Observational study using the 2018 submission of the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER)-18 Database. In total, 5,476 patients from 2004−2015 with a CCA were separated based on median household income (MHI) into low income (< 25th percentile of MHI) and high income (> 25th percentile of MHI) groups. Seventy-three percent of patients had complete follow up data, and were included in survival analyses. Survival and treatment outcomes were calculated using R-studio.
Results:
When all cases of CCA were included, the high-income group was more likely than the low-income to receive surgery, chemotherapy, and local tumor destruction modalities. Initial treatment modality based on income differed significantly between tumor locations. Patients of lower income had higher overall and cancer-specific mortality at 2 and 5 years. Non-cancer mortality was similar between the groups. Survival differences identified in the overall cohort were maintained in the intrahepatic CCA subgroup. No differences between income groups were noted in cancer-specific or overall mortality for perihilar tumors, with variable differences in the distal cohort.
Conclusions
Lower income was associated with higher rates of cancer-specific mortality and lower rates of surgical resection in CCA. There were significant differences in treatment selection and outcomes between intrahepatic, perihilar, and distal tumors. Population-based strategies aimed at identifying possible etiologies for these disparities are paramount to improving patient outcomes.
5.Associations between income and survival in cholangiocarcinoma:A comprehensive subtype-based analysis
Calvin X. GENG ; Anuragh R. GUDUR ; Jagannath KADIYALA ; Daniel S. STRAND ; Vanessa M. SHAMI ; Andrew Y. WANG ; Alexander PODBOY ; Tri M. LE ; Matthew REILLEY ; Victor ZAYDFUDIM ; Ross C. D. BUERLEIN
Annals of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery 2024;28(2):144-154
Background:
s/Aims: Socioeconomic determinants of health are incompletely characterized in cholangiocarcinoma (CCA). We assessed how socioeconomic status influences initial treatment decisions and survival outcomes in patients with CCA, additionally performing multiple sub-analyses based on anatomic location of the primary tumor.
Methods:
Observational study using the 2018 submission of the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER)-18 Database. In total, 5,476 patients from 2004−2015 with a CCA were separated based on median household income (MHI) into low income (< 25th percentile of MHI) and high income (> 25th percentile of MHI) groups. Seventy-three percent of patients had complete follow up data, and were included in survival analyses. Survival and treatment outcomes were calculated using R-studio.
Results:
When all cases of CCA were included, the high-income group was more likely than the low-income to receive surgery, chemotherapy, and local tumor destruction modalities. Initial treatment modality based on income differed significantly between tumor locations. Patients of lower income had higher overall and cancer-specific mortality at 2 and 5 years. Non-cancer mortality was similar between the groups. Survival differences identified in the overall cohort were maintained in the intrahepatic CCA subgroup. No differences between income groups were noted in cancer-specific or overall mortality for perihilar tumors, with variable differences in the distal cohort.
Conclusions
Lower income was associated with higher rates of cancer-specific mortality and lower rates of surgical resection in CCA. There were significant differences in treatment selection and outcomes between intrahepatic, perihilar, and distal tumors. Population-based strategies aimed at identifying possible etiologies for these disparities are paramount to improving patient outcomes.
6.Associations between income and survival in cholangiocarcinoma:A comprehensive subtype-based analysis
Calvin X. GENG ; Anuragh R. GUDUR ; Jagannath KADIYALA ; Daniel S. STRAND ; Vanessa M. SHAMI ; Andrew Y. WANG ; Alexander PODBOY ; Tri M. LE ; Matthew REILLEY ; Victor ZAYDFUDIM ; Ross C. D. BUERLEIN
Annals of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery 2024;28(2):144-154
Background:
s/Aims: Socioeconomic determinants of health are incompletely characterized in cholangiocarcinoma (CCA). We assessed how socioeconomic status influences initial treatment decisions and survival outcomes in patients with CCA, additionally performing multiple sub-analyses based on anatomic location of the primary tumor.
Methods:
Observational study using the 2018 submission of the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER)-18 Database. In total, 5,476 patients from 2004−2015 with a CCA were separated based on median household income (MHI) into low income (< 25th percentile of MHI) and high income (> 25th percentile of MHI) groups. Seventy-three percent of patients had complete follow up data, and were included in survival analyses. Survival and treatment outcomes were calculated using R-studio.
Results:
When all cases of CCA were included, the high-income group was more likely than the low-income to receive surgery, chemotherapy, and local tumor destruction modalities. Initial treatment modality based on income differed significantly between tumor locations. Patients of lower income had higher overall and cancer-specific mortality at 2 and 5 years. Non-cancer mortality was similar between the groups. Survival differences identified in the overall cohort were maintained in the intrahepatic CCA subgroup. No differences between income groups were noted in cancer-specific or overall mortality for perihilar tumors, with variable differences in the distal cohort.
Conclusions
Lower income was associated with higher rates of cancer-specific mortality and lower rates of surgical resection in CCA. There were significant differences in treatment selection and outcomes between intrahepatic, perihilar, and distal tumors. Population-based strategies aimed at identifying possible etiologies for these disparities are paramount to improving patient outcomes.