Extrinsic compression of the left main coronary artery (LMCA) secondary to pulmonary artery dilatation is a rare syndrome. Most cases of pulmonary artery hypertension but no atherosclerotic risk factors rarely undergo coronary angiography, and hence, diagnoses are seldom made and proper management is often delayed in these patients. We describe a patient that presented with pulmonary hypertension, clinical angina, and extrinsic compression of the LMCA by the pulmonary artery, who was treated successfully by percutaneous coronary intervention. Follow-up coronary angiography showed patent stent in the LMCA in the proximity of the dilated main pulmonary artery. This case reminds us that coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary intervention should be considered in pulmonary hypertension patients presenting with angina or left ventricular dysfunction.
Angina Pectoris/etiology ; Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary ; Coronary Angiography ; Coronary Stenosis/radiography/therapy ; Coronary Vessels/radiography/*ultrasonography ; Dilatation, Pathologic ; Female ; Humans ; Hypertension, Pulmonary/etiology/radiography ; Middle Aged ; Pulmonary Artery/radiography/*ultrasonography ; Stents ; Tomography, X-Ray Computed ; Ventricular Dysfunction, Left

OBJECTIVE: To compare multi-detector CT (MDCT) using 128-slice coronary CT angiography (Definition AS+, Siemens Medical Solution, Forchheim, Germany) with ECG-based maximum tube current modulation with echocardiography for the determination of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), end-diastolic volume (EDV), end-systolic volume (ESV), as well as assessing coronary artery image quality and patient radiation dose. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty consecutive patients (M:F = 20:10; mean age, 57.9 +/- 11.4 years) were referred for MDCT for evaluation of atypical chest pain. EF, EDV and ESV were determined for both MDCT and echocardiography, and the correlation coefficients were assessed. Coronary artery segment subjective image quality (1, excellent; 4, poor) and radiation dose were recorded. RESULTS: Left ventricular EF, EDV, and ESV were calculated by MDCT and echocardiography and the comparison showed a significant correlation with those estimated by echocardiography (p < 0.05). Consistently, the LVEFs calculated by MDCT and echocardiography were not statistically different. However, LV, EDV and ESV from MDCT were statistically higher than those from echocardiography (p < 0.05). The average image quality score of the coronary artery segment was 1.10 and the mean patient radiation dose was 3.99 +/- 1.85 mSv. CONCLUSION: Although LV volume was overestimated by MDCT, MDCT provides comparable results to echocardiography for LVEF and LVV, with a low radiation dose.
Coronary Angiography/*methods ; Coronary Disease/*radiography/ultrasonography ; Diastole ; Echocardiography ; *Electrocardiography ; Female ; Humans ; Linear Models ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Radiation Dosage ; Radiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted ; Stroke Volume ; Systole ; *Tomography, X-Ray Computed ; Ventricular Dysfunction, Left/*radiography/ultrasonography