1.Differential Histone Acetylation in Sub-Regions of Bed Nucleus of the Stria Terminalis Underlies Fear Consolidation and Extinction.
Vandana RANJAN ; Sanjay SINGH ; Sarfraj Ahmad SIDDIQUI ; Sukanya TRIPATHI ; Mohd Yahiya KHAN ; Anand PRAKASH
Psychiatry Investigation 2017;14(3):350-359
OBJECTIVE: The hallmark of anxiety disorders is excessive fear. Previous studies have suggested that selective neural projections from Basal nucleus of stria terminalis (BNST) to amygdala and vice-versa precisely control the fear learning process. However the exact mechanism how the BNST controls fear consolidation and its extinction is largely unknown. In the present study we observed the changes in the BNST sub-regions following fear conditioning and its extinction. METHODS: The change in the number of positive neurons was determined by immunohistochemistry for Acetyl H3 (Histone 3), Acetyl H4 (Histone 4), cAMP response element binding Protein (CBP) and c-fos in three sub-regions of the BNST namely the anterio-lateral BNST (STLP) and anterio-medial BNST (STMA), and lateral-ventral BNST (STLV) of rats subjected to auditory fear conditioning and extinction. RESULTS: We found significant increase in the number of CBP, acetyl H3 and acetyl H4 positive neurons in the STMA and STLV but not in the STLP after fear conditioning. However, following fear extinction the number of CBP, acetyl H3 and acetyl H4 positive neurons increased significantly in the STLP but not in the STMA and STLV. Similar changes were observed in the number of c-fos positive neurons after fear consolidation and extinction. CONCLUSION: The results from this study suggest that the differential histone acetylation in the different sub-regions of the BNST following fear learning and its extinction may be responsible for changes in the neuronal activation patterns resulting in either fear or less fear.
Acetylation*
;
Amygdala
;
Animals
;
Anxiety Disorders
;
Cyclic AMP Response Element-Binding Protein
;
Histones*
;
Immunohistochemistry
;
Learning
;
Neurons
;
Rats
;
Septal Nuclei*
2.Use of thiopurines in inflammatory bowel disease: an update
Arshdeep SINGH ; Ramit MAHAJAN ; Saurabh KEDIA ; Amit Kumar DUTTA ; Abhinav ANAND ; Charles N. BERNSTEIN ; Devendra DESAI ; C. Ganesh PAI ; Govind MAKHARIA ; Harsh Vardhan TEVETHIA ; Joyce WY MAK ; Kirandeep KAUR ; Kiran PEDDI ; Mukesh Kumar RANJAN ; Perttu ARKKILA ; Rakesh KOCHHAR ; Rupa BANERJEE ; Saroj Kant SINHA ; Siew Chien NG ; Stephen HANAUER ; Suhang VERMA ; Usha DUTTA ; Vandana MIDHA ; Varun MEHTA ; Vineet AHUJA ; Ajit SOOD
Intestinal Research 2022;20(1):11-30
Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), once considered a disease of the Western hemisphere, has emerged as a global disease. As the disease prevalence is on a steady rise, management of IBD has come under the spotlight. 5-Aminosalicylates, corticosteroids, immunosuppressive agents and biologics are the backbone of treatment of IBD. With the advent of biologics and small molecules, the need for surgery and hospitalization has decreased. However, economic viability and acceptability is an important determinant of local prescription patterns. Nearly one-third of the patients in West receive biologics as the first/initial therapy. The scenario is different in developing countries where biologics are used only in a small proportion of patients with IBD. Increased risk of reactivation of tuberculosis and high cost of the therapy are limitations to their use. Thiopurines hence become critical for optimal management of patients with IBD in these regions. However, approximately one-third of patients are intolerant or develop adverse effects with their use. This has led to suboptimal use of thiopurines in clinical practice. This review article discusses the clinical aspects of thiopurine use in patients with IBD with the aim of optimizing their use to full therapeutic potential.