Adult ; Antihypertensive Agents ; administration & dosage ; therapeutic use ; Cardiomyopathy, Dilated ; diagnosis ; drug therapy ; Echocardiography ; Humans ; Male ; Valsartan ; administration & dosage ; therapeutic use

OBJECTIVETo compare the renal protective effects between calcium channel blocker benidipine and angiotensin II receptor blocker valsartan in primary hypertension patients with proteinuria.

METHODSA total of 236 patients were divided to low (< 1 g/24 h) and high (1 - 3 g/24 h) proteinuria groups and treated with benidipine (8 mg/d) or valsartan (80 mg/d) for 48 weeks. Blood pressure, glomerular filtration rate (GFR) and 24 h protein were measured at baseline, 12, 24 and 48 weeks.

RESULTSBlood pressure was significantly and equally reduced in all treated groups (all P < 0.05 vs. baseline). GFR was also significantly and equally improved in all treated groups after 24 weeks treatments (all P < 0.05 at 24 weeks and 48 weeks). Proteinuria reduction at 24 and 48 weeks was more significant in patients treated with valsartan compared to patients treated with benidipine in low proteinuria group [24 weeks: (0.27 +/- 0.07) g/24 h vs. (0.39 +/- 0.06) g/24 h, P < 0.01; 48 weeks: (0.18 +/- 0.01) g/24 h vs. (0.30 +/- 0.05) g/24 h, P < 0.01].

CONCLUSIONThe renal protection efficacy of valsartan and benidipine was similar in primary hypertensive patients with proteinuria.

Adult ; Aged ; Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists ; therapeutic use ; Calcium Channel Blockers ; therapeutic use ; Dihydropyridines ; therapeutic use ; Female ; Glomerular Filtration Rate ; Humans ; Hypertension ; complications ; drug therapy ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Proteinuria ; complications ; drug therapy ; Tetrazoles ; therapeutic use ; Valine ; analogs & derivatives ; therapeutic use ; Valsartan

Female ; Humans ; Hypertension, Portal ; drug therapy ; etiology ; Liver Cirrhosis ; complications ; drug therapy ; Male ; Tetrazoles ; therapeutic use ; Valine ; analogs & derivatives ; therapeutic use ; Valsartan

OBJECTIVETo compare the effects of valsartan combined with amlodipine or hydrochlorothiazide regimen on blood pressure variation and plasma nitric oxide (NO) and endothelin (ET) in elderly hypertensive patients.

METHODSA total of 61 elderly patients with grade 2 or 3 hypertension were randomized into valsartan + amlodipine (the amlodipine group, n = 31) or valsartan + hydrochlorothiazide (the hydrochlorothiazide group, n = 30) group. Blood lipids, fasting plasma glucose and uric acid were determined before the treatment. 24-hour dynamic blood pressure, NO and ET were monitored at baseline, 8 and 16 weeks after treatment.

RESULTS24 hours blood pressure and daytime blood pressure were similar between two groups at all 3 time points. At 16 weeks, morning systolic blood pressure surge was significantly lower in amlodipine group than in hydrochlorothiazide group [(22.6 ± 8.8) mm Hg (1 mm Hg = 0.133 kPa) vs. (26.3 ± 13.7) mm Hg, P < 0.05]. 24 hours systolic blood pressure variability (SBPV) decreased progressively in both groups [the amlodipine group: (12.5 ± 2.8) mm Hg vs. (10.2 ± 2.2) mm Hg vs. (8.8 ± 1.6) mm Hg, P < 0.01; the hydrochlorothiazide group: (12.5 ± 2.5) mm Hg vs. (10.7 ± 2.2) mm Hg vs. (9.6 ± 2.0) mm Hg, P < 0.01]. Daytime SBPV also decreased progressively in both groups [the amlodipine group: (12.2 ± 3.0) mm Hg vs. (10.1 ± 2.3) mm Hg vs. (8.4 ± 1.9) mm Hg, P < 0.01; the hydrochlorothiazide group: (11.8 ± 2.7) mm Hg vs. (10.4 ± 1.9) mm Hg vs. (9.6 ± 2.2) mm Hg, P < 0.01]. 24 hours diastolic blood pressure variability (DBPV) was significantly reduced post therapy in the amlodipine group [(15.5 ± 3.4) mm Hg vs. (13.0 ± 3.5) mm Hg vs. (12.3 ± 2.5), P < 0.01] but not in the hydrochlorothiazide group. NO increased progressively [(27.3 ± 13.6) µmol/L vs. (47.2 ± 16.3) µmol/L vs. (69.5 ± 18.9) µmol/L in the amlodipine group, P < 0.01; (33.5 ± 13.9) µmol/L vs. (49.7 ± 21.9) µmol/L vs. (66.7 ± 24.7) µmol/L in the hydrochlorothiazide group, P < 0.01] and ET decreased progressively [(45.3 ± 8.0) ng/L vs. (37.4 ± 3.9) ng/L vs. (34.2 ± 4.4) ng/L in the amlodipine group, P < 0.01; (46.6 ± 10.4) ng/L vs. (37.0 ± 5.4) ng/L vs. (36.1 ± 8.2) ng/L in the hydrochlorothiazide group, P < 0.01] in both groups.

CONCLUSIONValsartan in combination with amlodipine or hydrochlorothiazide can both effectively lower BPV in elderly hypertensive patients and improve the vascular endothelial function and the former regimen is more suitable for elderly hypertensive patients.

Aged ; Amlodipine ; therapeutic use ; Blood Pressure ; drug effects ; Drug Therapy, Combination ; Female ; Humans ; Hydrochlorothiazide ; therapeutic use ; Hypertension ; drug therapy ; physiopathology ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Tetrazoles ; therapeutic use ; Treatment Outcome ; Valine ; analogs & derivatives ; therapeutic use ; Valsartan

OBJECTIVETo investigate the effect and mechanism of valsartan and felodipine extended release tablets (Plendil) on a novel salt-sensitive hypertensive rat induced by sensory denervation.

METHODSNewborn Wistar rats were given 50 mg/kg capsaicin subcutaneously on the 1st and 2nd day of life. Control rats were treated with vehicle solution (10%ethanol, 10%Tween 80 in saline). After weanling period (3 weeks), male rats were divided into 5 groups and subject to the following treatment for 4 weeks: control + high salt diet (4%, CON-HS), capsaicin + normal salt diet (0.5%, CAP-NS), capsaicin + high salt diet (CAP-HS), capsaicin + high salt diet + Valsartan (30 mg/kg per day, by orally) (CAP-HS-VAL), capsaicin + high salt diet + Plendil (30 mg/kg per day, by orally) (CAP-HS-PLE). Tail-cuff systolic blood pressure, body weight, intralymphocytic [Ca(2+)](i), plasma calcitonin gene-related peptide concentration ([CGRP]), angiotensin II concentration ([AngII]) and 24 hour water intake, urinary volume, urinary Na(+) and K(+) concentrations were examined.

RESULTSTail-cuff systolic blood pressure and intralymphocytic [Ca(2+)](i) were lower in CAP-HS-VAL or CAP-HS-PLE group than those in CAP-HS group. Plasma [AngII] were higher in CAP-HS-VAL group than that in other groups. Tail-cuff systolic blood pressure were lower in CAP-HS-VAL group than that in CAP-HS-PLE group. Intralymphocytic [Ca(2+)](i) were lower in CAP-HS-PLE group than that in CAP-HS-VAL group. The 24 hour urine sodium excretion was higher in CAP-HS-PLE group than that in CAP-HS or CAP-HS-VAL group.

CONCLUSIONValsartan or Plendil could prevent the development of salt-sensitive hypertension induced by sensory denervation and the overloading of intracellular [Ca(2+)](i), which indicated that salt-sensitive hypertension induced by sensory nerve degeneration might be related to renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) and the over loading intracellular [Ca(2+)](i), and might be more closely to RAAS.

Animals ; Antihypertensive Agents ; therapeutic use ; Blood Pressure ; Felodipine ; therapeutic use ; Hypertension ; chemically induced ; drug therapy ; physiopathology ; Male ; Rats ; Rats, Wistar ; Sodium Chloride, Dietary ; Tetrazoles ; therapeutic use ; Valine ; analogs & derivatives ; therapeutic use ; Valsartan

OBJECTIVETo assess the efficacy and safety of valsartan/hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) 80/12.5 mg once daily (o.d.) in Chinese patients with mild to moderate essential hypertension who was not adequately controlled by valsartan 80 mg o.d. monotherapy.

METHODSIn this multi-center, double-blind, randomized, active controlled, parallel group trial, 1051 out of 1175 Chinese patients with mild to moderate essential hypertension [DBP >or= 95 mm Hg and < 110 mm Hg (1 mm Hg = 0.133 kPa)] completed single-blind run-in period (valsartan 80 mg o.d. therapy for 4 weeks) after 2 week's wash-out period. At the end of the single-blind run-in period, those patients with DBP >or= 95 mm Hg (n = 864) were randomized in 1:1 ratio to Valsartan and Valsartan 80 mg (n = 429)/HCTZ80/12.5 mg (n = 435) treatment o.d. for 8 weeks. Safety and efficacy was assessed every 4 weeks during double blind phase.

RESULTSAt the end of study, valsartan/HCTZ 80/12.5 mg combination treatment further reduced systolic (-3.5 mm Hg) and diastolic (-2.2 mm Hg) pressures and increased the rate of patients reaching goal BP level (53.9% vs. 40.9%) compared to valsartan 80 mg o.d. monotherapy. Incidence of side effects was similar between the combination therapy and monotherapy groups (8.9% vs. 5.1%, P > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONEfficacy of Valsartan 80 mg/HCTZ 12.5 mg compound was superior to valsartan 80 mg on BP reduction and goal BP control rate in Chinese patients with mild to moderate essential hypertension. The combination of Valsartan 80 mg/hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) 12.5 mg provides a suitable treatment for Chinese patients who are not adequately controlled by valsartan 80 mg o.d. monotherapy.

Adult ; Antihypertensive Agents ; adverse effects ; therapeutic use ; Double-Blind Method ; Drug Therapy, Combination ; Female ; Humans ; Hydrochlorothiazide ; adverse effects ; therapeutic use ; Hypertension ; drug therapy ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Tetrazoles ; adverse effects ; therapeutic use ; Valine ; adverse effects ; analogs & derivatives ; therapeutic use ; Valsartan

Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers ; therapeutic use ; Animals ; Gastric Mucosa ; blood supply ; pathology ; Hypertension, Portal ; drug therapy ; Male ; Propranolol ; therapeutic use ; Rats ; Rats, Wistar ; Tetrazoles ; therapeutic use ; Valine ; analogs & derivatives ; therapeutic use ; Valsartan

Humans ; Stroke Volume ; Valsartan/therapeutic use* ; Heart Failure/drug therapy* ; Hypotension/drug therapy* ; Aminobutyrates/therapeutic use* ; Drug Combinations ; Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists/therapeutic use* ; Tetrazoles/therapeutic use* ; Treatment Outcome ; Ventricular Function, Left

Humans ; Stroke Volume ; Valsartan/therapeutic use* ; Heart Failure/drug therapy* ; Hypotension/drug therapy* ; Aminobutyrates/therapeutic use* ; Drug Combinations ; Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists/therapeutic use* ; Tetrazoles/therapeutic use* ; Treatment Outcome ; Ventricular Function, Left

OBJECTIVETo observe the effects of angiotensin II type 1 receptor blocker valsartan in preventing hepatic fibrosis induced by dimethylnitrosamine in rats.

METHODSExcept rats in the control group, all were given intraperitoneal injections of 1% dimethylnitrosamine (DMN 1 ml/kg, two or three consecutive days/a week for 6 weeks). From the first day of the intraperitoneal injection, rats in treatment groups were given valsartan for 8 weeks by gastric gavage. Liver tissue and blood samples of all rats were examined at 56 days (8 weeks). AngII levels were determined by radioimmunoassay. Hepatic mRNA levels of Collagen type I (Col I) and tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase1 (TIMP1) were evaluated by reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR).

RESULTSValsartan significantly attenuated the degree of liver fibrosis and decreased the hepatic AngII content compared with DMN treated rats (P<0.01). mRNA levels of Col I and TIMP1 were upregulated in DMN treated rats compared with normal rats. Valsartan downregulated the elevation of Col I and TIMP1 mRNA levels (P<0.01).

CONCLUSIONHepatic AngII content of the model group was increased, the local tissue RAS was activated in DMN induced liver fibrosis. Valsartan can retard the progression of hepatic fibrosis and may provide an effective new strategy for anti-liver fibrosis therapy.

Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers ; pharmacology ; therapeutic use ; Animals ; Dimethylnitrosamine ; Female ; Liver Cirrhosis, Experimental ; chemically induced ; prevention & control ; Male ; Random Allocation ; Rats ; Rats, Wistar ; Tetrazoles ; pharmacology ; therapeutic use ; Valine ; analogs & derivatives ; pharmacology ; therapeutic use ; Valsartan