1.Spoken and Written Narrative in Persian-Speaking Students Who Received Cochlear Implant and/or Hearing Aid.
Peyman ZAMANI ; Zahra SOLEYMANI ; Vahid RASHEDI ; Farhad FARAHANI ; Gohar LOTFI ; Mohammad REZAEI
Clinical and Experimental Otorhinolaryngology 2018;11(4):250-258
OBJECTIVES: To compare narrative skills between fourth and fifth grades of Persian-speaking students with hearing impairments and typical hearing students of the same grade and also to evaluate the effects of group, sex, hearing age, and educational grade of the students on their spoken/written narrative performance. METHODS: The subjects were 174 students aged 10–13 years, 54 of whom wore cochlear implants, 60 suffered from moderate to severe hearing losses and wore hearing aids, with the remaining 60 students being typical hearing in terms of the sense of hearing. The micro- and macrostructure components of spoken and written narrative were elicited from a pictorial story (The Playful Little Elephant) and then scored by raters. RESULTS: Compared to the typical hearing, the students with hearing impairments had significantly lower scores in all of the microstructure components of narratives. However, the findings showed no significant difference among different groups in macrostructure components of narratives. It was also revealed that the students had equal performance in spoken and written narrative. Finally, factor analysis manifested that group, sex, hearing age, and educational level of children might alter the outcome measures in various interactions. CONCLUSION: Although cochlear implantation was more effective than hearing aid on spoken and written narrative skills, the Persian-speaking students with hearing impairments were seen to need additional trainings on microstructure components of spoken/written narrative.
Child
;
Cochlear Implantation
;
Cochlear Implants*
;
Hearing Aids*
;
Hearing Loss
;
Hearing*
;
Humans
;
Narration
;
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
2.False-Positive Mycobacterium tuberculosis Detection: Ways to Prevent Cross- Contamination
Mohammad ASGHARZADEH ; Mahdi Asghari OZMA ; Jalil RASHEDI ; Mahdavi POOR ; Vahid AGHARZADEH ; Ali VEGARI ; Behrooz SHOKOUHI ; Khudaverdi GANBAROV ; Nima Najafi GHALEHLOU ; Hamed Ebrahmzadeh LEYLABADLO ; Hossein Samadi KAFIL
Tuberculosis and Respiratory Diseases 2020;83(3):211-217
The gold standard method for diagnosis of tuberculosis is the isolation of Mycobacterium tuberculosis through culture, but there is a probability of cross-contamination in simultaneous cultures of samples causing false-positives. This can result in delayed treatment of the underlying disease and drug side effects. In this paper, we reviewed studies on falsepositive cultures of M. tuberculosis . Rate of occurrence, effective factors, and extent of false-positives were analyzed. Ways to identify and reduce the false-positives and management of them are critical for all laboratories. In most cases, falsepositive is occurring in cases with only one positive culture but negative direct smear. The three most crucial factors in this regard are inappropriate technician function, contamination of reagents, and aerosol production. Thus, to reduce false-positives, good laboratory practice, as well as use of whole-genome sequencing or genotyping of all positive culture samples with a robust, extra pure method and rapid response, are essential for minimizing the rate of false-positives. Indeed, molecular approaches and epidemiological surveillance can provide a valuable tool besides culture to identify possible false positives.