1.Labour Induction With Randomized Comparison Of Oral And Intravaginal Misoprostol In Post Date Multigravida Women
Aqueela Ayaz ; Shazia Saeed ; Mian Usman Farooq ; Iftikhar Ahmad ; Muhammad Luqman Ali Bahoo ; Muhammad Saeed
Malaysian Journal of Medical Sciences 2009;16(1):34-38
The efficacy and safety of oral versus vaginal misoprostol for elective induction of labor in post
date multigravida with an unfavourable cervix was compared over a period of one year in the Bahawal
Victoria Hospital, Bahawalpur, Pakistan. Eightyeight multigravida post date women were divided into
two groups and given 50 mg misoprostol orally and 50 mg intravaginally, respectively. The induction
to onset of significant uterine contractions and delivery intervals were lower in the first group (7.8 h
vs. 8.9 h) when compared to (10.4 h vs. 12 h). The first group had a higher rate of Caesarean section
(7% vs. 4%; p>0.05), uterine hyperstimulation (9% vs. 5%; p>0.05), uterine tachysystole (23% vs. 14%;
p>0.05) and neonatal admissions to intensive care unit (12% vs. 4%; p>0.05) when compared to second
group. Fifty mg oral misoprostol has the potential to induce labor as safely and effectively as the
intravaginal route.
2.Bilateral myelomatous pleural effusion: presentation of two cases.
Akshay AMARANENI ; Usman SAEED ; Devin MALIK ; Megan BROWN ; Sreenivasa R CHANDANA
Blood Research 2016;51(2):142-144
No abstract available.
Pleural Effusion*
3.Bilateral myelomatous pleural effusion: presentation of two cases.
Akshay AMARANENI ; Usman SAEED ; Devin MALIK ; Megan BROWN ; Sreenivasa R CHANDANA
Blood Research 2016;51(2):142-144
No abstract available.
Pleural Effusion*
4.Intercomparison of environmental gamma doses measured with A NaI (Tl) survey meter and thermoluminescent dosimeters (TLDs) in the Poonch division of Azad Kashmir, Pakistan.
Muhammad RAFIQUE ; Kimberlee J KEARFOTT ; Khalil AHMAD ; Jabeen AKHTER ; Abdul Razzaq KHAN ; Raja Azhar SAEED ; Saeed Ur RAHMAN ; Matiullah ; Muhammad Usman RAJPUT
Biomedical and Environmental Sciences 2014;27(12):969-972
This study presents the intercomparison of the outdoor environmental gamma dose rates measured using a NaI (Tl) based survey meter along with thermoluminescent dosimeters (TLDs) and estimation of excess lifetime cancer risk (ELCR), for the inhabitants of Poonch division of the Azad Kashmir, Pakistan. CaF2: Dy (TLD-200) card dosimeters were installed at height of 1 m from ground at fifteen different locations covering the entire Poonch division comprising of three districts. During three distinct two month time periods within the six month study period, all the installed dosimeters were exposed to outdoor environmental gamma radiations, retrieved and read out at Radiation Dosimetry Laboratory, Health Physics Division, PINSTECH laboratory, Islamabad. The ambient outdoor gamma dose rate measurements were also taken with NaI (Tl) based portable radiometric instrument at 1 m above the ground. To estimate the annual gamma doses, NaI (Tl) based survey data were used for one complete year following the deployment of the dosimeters. The mean annual gamma dose rates measured by TLDs and survey meter were found as 1.47±0.10 and 0.862±0.003 mGy/y respectively. Taking into account a 29% outdoor occupancy factor, the annual average effective dose rate for individuals was estimated as 0.298±0.04 and 0.175±0.03 mSv/y by TLDs and survey meter, respectively. For outdoor exposure, the ELCR was calculated from the TLD and survey meter measurements. The environmental outdoor average annual effective dose obtained in present study are less than the estimated world average terrestrial and cosmic gamma ray dose rate of 0.9 mSv/y reported in UNSCEAR 2000. The possible origins of gamma doses in the area and incompatibilities of results obtained from the two different measurement techniques are also discussed.
Gamma Rays
;
adverse effects
;
Humans
;
Neoplasms
;
etiology
;
Pakistan
;
Radiation Monitoring
;
instrumentation