PURPOSE: The da Vinci(R) robot system has been used to perform complex reconstructive procedures in a minimally invasive fashion. Robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy has recently established as one of the standard cares. Based on experience with the robotic prostatectomy, its use is naturally expanding into other urologic surgeries. We examine our practical pattern and application of da Vinci(R) robot system in urologic field. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Robotic urologic surgery has been performed during a period from July 2005 to August 2008 in a total of 708 cases. Surgery was performed by 7 operators. In our series, radical prostatectomy was performed in 623 cases, partial nephrectomy in 43 cases, radical cystectomy in 11 cases, nephroureterectomy in 18 cases and other surgeries in 15 cases. RESULTS: In the first year, robotic urologic surgery was performed in 43 cases. However, in the second year, it was performed in 164 cases, and it was performed in 407 cases in the third year. In the first year, only prostatectomy was performed. In the second year, partial nephrectomy (2 cases), nephroureterectomy (3 cases) and cystectomy (1 case) were performed. In the third year, other urologic surgeries than prostatectomy were performed in 64 cases. The first robotic surgery was performed with long operative time. For instance, the operative time of prostatectomy, partial nephrectomy, cystectomy and nephroureterectomy was 418, 222, 340 and 320 minutes, respectively. Overall, the mean operative time of prostatectomy, partial nephrectomy, cystectomy and nephrourectectomy was 179, 173, 309, and 206 minutes, respectively. CONCLUSION: Based on our experience at a single-institution, robot system can be used both safely and efficiently in many areas of urologic surgeries including prostatectomy. Once this system is familiar to surgeons, it will be used in a wide range of urologic surgery.
Aged ; Cystectomy/instrumentation/methods ; Female ; Humans ; Korea ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Nephrectomy/instrumentation/methods ; Prostatectomy/instrumentation/methods ; Prostatic Neoplasms/surgery ; Robotics/instrumentation/*methods ; Urologic Surgical Procedures/instrumentation/*methods

OBJECTIVETo evaluate the clinical effect of urethral dilation with a zebra guidewire-guided fascia dilator in the treatment of complex urethral stricture after hypospadias surgery.

METHODSThis study included 12 cases of complex urethral stricture after hypospadias surgery that had failed to respond to other urethral dilation therapies. A zebra guidewire was put into the urethra via a ureteroscope placed in through a suprapubic puncture hole. Then a fascia dilator was inserted along the zebra guidewire for urethral dilation. A silicone catheter was reserved for 2 weeks after the dilation.

RESULTSAll the 12 patients achieved smooth urination after removal of the catheter. During the 6 - 28 months follow-up, 8 of the cases were cured after 1 - 6 regular urethral dilations and the other 4 experienced no more dysuria.

CONCLUSIONUrethral dilation with a zebra guidewire-guided fascia dilator is a safe and effective method for the treatment of complex urethral stricture after hypospadias surgery.

Adolescent ; Child ; Child, Preschool ; Dilatation ; instrumentation ; methods ; Fasciotomy ; Humans ; Hypospadias ; surgery ; Male ; Treatment Outcome ; Urethral Stricture ; etiology ; surgery ; Urologic Surgical Procedures ; instrumentation ; methods

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to examine whether urethroplasty with a turnover flap, as an alternative method of distal hypospadias repair in adolescents, improves the outcome of surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between January 2004 and December 2013, a total of 38 adolescents (aged 11-17 years) underwent distal hypospadias repair with either the tubularized incised plate (TIP) procedure (n=25) or the turnover flap procedure (n=13). The turnover flap procedure was performed with a proximal, ventral penile flap that was turned over to cover the urethral plate. Patient demographics, perioperative outcomes, complications, and postoperative uroflowmetry in each surgical group were analyzed retrospectively. RESULTS: The patient demographics were similar in the two groups. There were no significant differences in perioperative outcomes between the groups, including mean operative time, duration of hospital stay, and urethral catheterization. The number of patients with at least one complication, including wound dehiscence, urethrocutaneous fistula, meatal stenosis, and urethral stricture, was lower in the turnover flap group (1/13, 7.7%) than in the TIP group (11/25, 44%, p=0.030). The incidence of meatal stenosis was lower in the turnover flap group (0/12, 0%) than in the TIP group (6/25, 24%). In postoperative uroflowmetry, the plateau-shaped curve rate was lower in the turnover flap group (1/12, 8.3%) than in the TIP group (5/19, 26.3%); the peak flow was higher (p=0.030). CONCLUSIONS: The turnover flap procedure is clinically useful for repairing adolescent distal hypospadias because it offers lower complication rates and better functional outcomes than TIP.
Adolescent ; Child ; Follow-Up Studies ; Humans ; Hypospadias/*surgery ; Male ; Reconstructive Surgical Procedures/*methods ; Retrospective Studies ; *Surgical Flaps ; Suture Techniques/*instrumentation ; Time Factors ; Treatment Outcome ; Urethra/*surgery ; Urologic Surgical Procedures, Male/*methods ; Wound Healing

PURPOSE: Transurethral resection of bladder tumor (TURBT) can be a challenging procedure for an inexperienced surgeon. We suggest an easy technique for TURBT, which we have named the "grasp and bite" technique. We describe this technique and compare its effectiveness and safety with that of conventional TURBT. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Monopolar TURBT (24-Fr Karl Storz) was performed in 35 patients who had superficial bladder tumors. After defining the tumor margin, the tumor and surrounding mucosa were grasped by use of a loop electrode and resectoscope sheath. With tight grasping, linear moving resection was performed. The patients' demographic, intraoperative, and postoperative data were analyzed between the conventional and grasp and bite TURBT groups. RESULTS: Of 35 patients, 16 patients underwent conventional TURBT (group 1), and the other 19 patients underwent grasp and bite TURBT (group 2). Both groups were similar in age, tumor multiplicity, size, anesthesia method, and location. Grasp and bite TURBT could be performed as safely and effectively as conventional TURBT. There were no significant differences in irrigation duration, urethral catheterization, postoperative hemoglobin drop, or length of hospital stay. No significant side effects such as bladder perforation, severe obturator reflex, or persistent bleeding occurred. There were no significant pathological differences between specimens according to the type of resection technique. CONCLUSIONS: The grasp and bite TURBT technique was feasible for superficial bladder tumors. It may be a good tool for inexperienced surgeons owing to its convenient and easy manner.
Aged ; Cystoscopy ; Electrodes ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Postoperative Complications ; Urinary Bladder/pathology/*surgery ; Urinary Bladder Neoplasms/pathology/*surgery ; Urologic Surgical Procedures/instrumentation/*methods