PURPOSE: To compare perioperative outcomes between running and interrupted vesicourethral anastomosis in open radical prostatectomy (RP). MATERIALS AND METHODS: The medical records of 112 patients who underwent open RP for prostate cancer at our institution from 2006 to 2008 by a single surgeon were retrospectively reviewed. Preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative parameters were measured. RESULTS: Of 112 consecutive patients, 62 patients underwent vesicourethral anastomosis by use of the running technique, whereas 50 patients underwent anastomosis with the interrupted technique. The groups did not differ significantly in age, body mass index, prostate-specific antigen, prostate volume, or pathologic findings. The intraoperative extravasation rate was significantly lower in the running group (8.1% vs. 24.0%, p=0.01). The mean anastomosis time was 15.1+/-5.3 and 19.3+/-4.6 minutes in the running and interrupted groups, respectively (p=0.04). The rates of postoperative extravasation were similar for both groups (6.4% vs. 10.0%, p=0.12). The duration of catheterization was significantly shorter in the running group (9.0+/-3.0 days vs. 12.9+/-6.4 days, p<0.01). The rate of urinary retention after catheter removal and the rate of bladder neck contracture were not significantly different between the two groups. The rate of urinary continence at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months after RP was also similar in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: Both anastomosis techniques provided similar functional results and a similar rate of postoperative urine extravasation. However, running vesicourethral anastomosis decreased the rate of intraoperative extravasation and time for anastomosis, without increasing the risk of urinary retention or bladder neck contracture.
Aged ; Anastomosis, Surgical/methods ; Follow-Up Studies ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Neoplasm Staging ; Prostatectomy/adverse effects/*methods ; Prostatic Neoplasms/pathology/*surgery ; Retrospective Studies ; Suture Techniques ; Treatment Outcome ; Urethra/*surgery ; Urinary Bladder/*surgery ; Urinary Incontinence/etiology/prevention & control ; Urinary Retention/etiology

PURPOSE: This study was done to develop an evidence-based incontinence care protocol through an adaptation process and to evaluate the effects of the protocol. METHODS: The protocol was developed according to the guideline of adaptation. A non-randomized controlled trial was used for testing the effects of the new Incontinence Care Protocol. A total of 120 patients having bowel incontinence with Bristol stool type 5, 6, and 7 and admitted to intensive care units were recruited to this study. The newly developed incontinence care protocol was used with patients in the experimental group and conventional skin care was given to patients in the control group. Outcome variables were incontinence-associated dermatitis (IAD) severity, pressure ulcer occurrence and severity. RESULTS: The experimental group had significantly less severe IAD (t=6.69, p<.001), lower occurrence of pressure ulcers (chi2=7.35, p=.007), and less severity of pressure ulcers (Mann-Whitney=86.00, p=.009) than the control group. CONCLUSION: Use of this incontinence care protocol has the effects of preventing pressure ulcers and inhibiting worsening of IAD and pressure ulcers. Therefore, this incontinence care protocol is expected to contribute to managing IAD and pressure ulcers.
Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Dermatitis/pathology ; Evidence-Based Nursing/*standards ; Fecal Incontinence/pathology/*prevention & control ; Female ; Humans ; Intensive Care Units ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Pressure Ulcer/epidemiology/pathology ; Program Development ; *Program Evaluation ; Severity of Illness Index ; Skin Care ; Urinary Incontinence/pathology/*prevention & control