OBJECTIVETo evaluate the safety and effectiveness of a modified method of holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP)--6-o'clock tunnel HoLEP for the treatment of benign prostate hyperplasia (BPH).

METHODSWe included 112 cases of BPH in this study, 57 treated by 6-o'clock tunnel HoLEP (experimental group) and the other 55 by conventional HoLEP (control group). We compared the operation time, volume of the resected prostatic tissue, intraoperative blood transfusion, volume of bladder irrigation solution, postoperative hemoglobin change, and incidence of urinary incontinence between the two groups.

RESULTSStatistically significant differences were observed between the experimental and control groups in the operation time ([56.01 ± 8.62] min vs [68.65 ± 9.08] min), cases of intraoperative blood transfusion (0 vs 2), volume of bladder irrigation solution ([27.51 ± 3.67] L vs [36.89 ± 6.47] L), postoperative hemoglobin decrease ([10.70 ± 2.50] g/L vs [12.60 ± 3.30] g/L), and cases of postoperative stress-induced urinary incontinence (2 vs 7) (all P <0.05). One-month follow-up revealed smooth urination in both groups of patients but no true urinary incontinence or secondary bleeding in either.

CONCLUSIONModified 6-o'clock tunnel HoLEP can significantly reduce the operation time, bladder irrigation, and intraoperative bleeding, and therefore can be used as a safe and effective option for the treatment of BPH.

Case-Control Studies ; Hemorrhage ; prevention & control ; Holmium ; Humans ; Laser Therapy ; methods ; Lasers, Solid-State ; therapeutic use ; Male ; Operative Time ; Postoperative Period ; Prostatic Hyperplasia ; surgery ; Therapeutic Irrigation ; statistics & numerical data ; Urinary Bladder ; Urinary Incontinence ; epidemiology ; etiology ; Urinary Incontinence, Stress ; etiology

OBJECTIVETo compare the incidence rates of postoperative urinary incontinence between transurethral bipolar plasmakinetic enucleation and resection of the prostate (PKERP) and transurethral bipolar plasmakinetic resection of the prostate (PKRP), and provide evidence for the clinical application of PKERP.

METHODSTotally, 180 BPH patients were equally and randomly assigned to undergo PKERP and PKRP, respectively. We measured the urinary incontinence of the patients by pad test at 24 hours after extubation and every week after surgery for 4 weeks. Meanwhile, we recorded and compared the PSA level, prostate volume, Qmax, residual urine, IPSS, QOL, and the results of pad test between the two groups before and after surgery.

RESULTSThe incidence rates of urinary incontinence in the PKERP and PKRP groups were 35.56% and 18.89% (P < 0.01) at 24 hours after extubation, 20.00% and 7.78% at 1 week after surgery (P < 0.05), and 3.33% and 2.22% at 2 weeks. There was no significant difference in the severity of urinary incontinence between the two groups at any time point (P > 0.05). No permanent urinary incontinence was observed in either group.

CONCLUSIONCompared with PKRP, PKERP has a higher incidence rate of short-term urinary incontinence in the treatment of BPH, but not that of genuine incontinence, with similar severity and recovery time.

Aged ; Humans ; Incidence ; Male ; Postoperative Complications ; epidemiology ; Prostatic Hyperplasia ; surgery ; Single-Blind Method ; Transurethral Resection of Prostate ; adverse effects ; methods ; Urinary Incontinence ; epidemiology

PURPOSE: The objective of this study is to evaluate the continence rate following reconstruction of the posterior urethral plate in robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (RLRP). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective analysis of 50 men with clinically localized prostate cancer who underwent RLRP was carried out. Twenty-five patients underwent RLRP using the reconstruction of the posterior aspect of the rhabdosphincter (Rocco repair). Results of 25 consecutive patients who underwent RLRP prior to the implementation of the Rocco repair were used as the control. Continence was assessed at 7, 30, 90, and 180 days following foley catheter removal using the EPIC questionnaire as well as a follow-up interview with the surgeon. RESULTS: There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups in any of the patient demographics. At 7 days, the Rocco experimental group had a continence rate of 19% vs. 38.1% in the non-Rocco control group (p = 0.306). At 30 days, the continence rate in the Rocco group was 76.2% vs. 71.4% in the non-Rocco group (p = 1). At 90 days, the values were 88% vs. 80% (p = 0.718), respectively. At 180 days, the pad-free rate was 96% in both groups. CONCLUSION: Rocco repair offers no significant advantage in the time to recovery of continence following RLRP when continence is defined as the use of zero pads per day. On the other hand, Rocco repair was associated with increased incidence of urinary retention requiring prolonged foley catheter placement.
Aged ; Humans ; Laparoscopy/adverse effects/*methods ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Prostatectomy/adverse effects/*methods ; Retrospective Studies ; Urethra/*surgery ; Urinary Incontinence/*epidemiology/surgery

Urinary incontinence (UI) and erectile dysfunction (ED) are both very prevalent conditions. Insertion of an artificial urinary sphincter (AUS) and penile prosthesis (PP) is an effective and proven method of treatment for both conditions. With advancing age, as well as with increasing populations of patients radically treated for prostate cancer, the occurrence of both conditions found in the same patient is increasing. The purpose of this article was to analyze the available evidence for simultaneous surgical management of male ED and UI using prosthetic devices. The existing literature pertaining to dual implantation of AUS and PP was reviewed. The concomitant insertion of the PP with the male perineal sling was also considered. Concurrent ED and UI are increasingly seen in the post radical prostatectomy population, who are often younger and less willing to suffer with these conditions. Insertion of an AUS and PP, either simultaneously or as a two-stage procedure, appears to be a safe, efficacious and long-lasting method of treatment. The improvements in design of both the AUS and PP as well as the development of the single transverse scrotal incision have made simultaneous insertion of these prostheses possible. Dual implantation of the PP and male sling looks promising in a selected population. In conclusion, the insertion of the AUS and PP for the treatment of concurrent UI and ED is safe and effective. Simultaneous insertion of these prostheses in the same patient offers potential advantages in operative and recovery time and is associated with high patient satisfaction. Combination therapy should therefore be included in the arsenal of treatment of these conditions.
Equipment Failure ; statistics & numerical data ; Erectile Dysfunction ; complications ; surgery ; History, 20th Century ; Humans ; Male ; Penile Implantation ; methods ; Penile Prosthesis ; Postoperative Complications ; epidemiology ; Prosthesis Implantation ; methods ; Treatment Outcome ; Urinary Incontinence ; complications ; surgery ; Urinary Sphincter, Artificial

The field of prosthetic urology demonstrates the striking impact that simple devices can have on quality of life. Penile prosthesis and artificial urinary sphincter implantation are the cornerstone procedures on which this specialty focuses. Modern research largely concentrates on decreasing the rates of complication and infection, as the current devices offer superior rates of satisfaction when revision is not necessary. These techniques are also able to salvage sexual function and continence in more difficult patient populations including female-to-male transgender individuals, those with ischemic priapism, and those with erectile dysfunction and incontinence secondary to prostatectomy. This review summarizes modern techniques, outcomes, and complications in the field of prosthetic urology.
Erectile Dysfunction/surgery* ; Humans ; Male ; Penile Implantation/methods* ; Penile Prosthesis ; Postoperative Complications/epidemiology* ; Prostatectomy/adverse effects* ; Prosthesis Failure ; Prosthesis Implantation/methods* ; Prosthesis-Related Infections/epidemiology* ; Surgical Wound Infection/epidemiology* ; Urethra/injuries* ; Urinary Incontinence, Stress/surgery* ; Urinary Retention/epidemiology* ; Urinary Sphincter, Artificial ; Urology

Emerging evidence has suggested that cytoreductive prostatectomy (CRP) allows superior oncologic control when compared to current standard of care androgen deprivation therapy alone. However, the safety and benefit of cytoreduction in metastatic prostate cancer (mPCa) has not been proven. Therefore, we evaluated the incidence of complications following CRP in men newly diagnosed with mPCa. A total of 68 patients who underwent CRP from 2006 to 2014 at four tertiary surgical centers were compared to 598 men who underwent radical prostatectomy for clinically localized prostate cancer (PCa). Urinary incontinence was defined as the use of any pad. CRP had longer operative times (200 min vs 140 min, P < 0.0001) and higher estimated blood loss (250 ml vs 125 ml, P < 0.0001) compared to the control group. However, both overall (8.82% vs 5.85%) and major complication rates (4.41% vs 2.17%) were comparable between the two groups. Importantly, urinary incontinence rate at 1-year after surgery was significantly higher in the CRP group (57.4% vs 90.8%, P < 0.0001). Univariate logistic analysis showed that the estimated blood loss was the only independent predictor of perioperative complications both in the unadjusted model (OR: 1.18; 95% CI: 1.02-1.37; P = 0.025) and surgery type-adjusted model (OR: 1.17; 95% CI: 1.01-1.36; P = 0.034). In conclusion, CRP is more challenging than radical prostatectomy and associated with a notably higher incidence of urinary incontinence. Nevertheless, CRP is a technically feasible and safe surgery for selecting PCa patients who present with node-positive or bony metastasis when performed by experienced surgeons. A prospective, multi-institutional clinical trial is currently underway to verify this concept.
Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Blood Loss, Surgical ; Cytoreduction Surgical Procedures/adverse effects* ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Neoplasm Grading ; Postoperative Complications/epidemiology* ; Predictive Value of Tests ; Prostatectomy/adverse effects* ; Prostatic Neoplasms/surgery* ; Retrospective Studies ; Urinary Incontinence/etiology*