This paper gathered the problem in the Sterile Urethral Catheter(Catheterization bag)'s packaging and marking, analyzed the harmfulness and gave the improvement suggestion.
Disposable Equipment ; Product Packaging ; methods ; Urinary Catheterization ; instrumentation ; Urinary Catheters

PURPOSE: The conventional trocar and cannula method in peritoneal dialysis (PD) catheter insertion has its limitation in clinical setting. The aim of this study was to compare a modified method for percutaneous PD catheter insertion with the conventional method, and demonstrate advantages of the modified method. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients at a single center who had percutaneous PD catheters inserted by nephrologists from January 2006 until September 2012, using either a modified method (group M) or the conventional trocar and cannula method (group C), were retrospectively analyzed, in terms of baseline characteristics, complications experienced up to 3 months after the procedure, and the suitability of the procedure for patients. RESULTS: Group M included 82 subjects, while group C included 66 cases. The overall early complication rate in group M (1.2%) was significantly lower than that in group C (19.7%) (p<0.001). The catheter revision rate during timeframe for early complications was significantly lower in group M (0%) than in group C (6.1%) (p=0.024). When comparing Procedure time (1 h 3 min+/-16 min vs. 1 h 36 min+/-19 min, p<0.01), immediate post-procedural pain (2.43+/-1.80 vs. 3.14+/-2.07, p<0.05), and post-procedure days until ambulation (3.95+/-1.13 days vs. 6.17+/-1.34 days, p<0.01), group M was significantly lower than group C. There was no significant difference in total hospitalization period (14.71+/-7.05 days vs. 13.86+/-3.7 days). CONCLUSION: Our modified PD catheter insertion method shows its advantages in early complication rate, early complications revision rate, and the patients' conveniences.
Adult ; Aged ; *Catheters, Indwelling ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Peritoneal Dialysis/instrumentation/*methods ; Retrospective Studies ; Surgical Instruments ; Treatment Outcome ; Urinary Catheterization/*instrumentation/methods ; Young Adult

OBJECTIVETo compare the advantages and disadvantages of the Foley catheter draining method versus the urethral stent plus gastric tube draining method for urine drainage following urethroplasty for hypospadias.

METHODSWe retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of 361 cases of hypospadias treated by urethroplasty. After operation, 91 of the cases received urine drainage with the Foley catheter (group A) and 270 with a urethral stent plus a gastric tube (group B). We compared the incidence rates of bladder irritation, fistula, urethral stricture, and urethral diverticulum between the two groups of patients.

RESULTSNo statistically significant differences were found between groups A and B in the incidences of bladder irritation (9.89% vs 10.70%, P > 0.05) and urethral diverticulum (1.09% vs 2.22%, P > 0.05). The incidence rate of fistula was markedly higher in group A than in B (20.80% vs 13.30%, P < 0.05), and so was that of urethral stricture (10.90% vs 5.55%, P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONThe urethral stent plus gastric tube draining method is more effective than the Foley catheter draining method for urine drainage following urethroplasty.

Aged ; Child ; Diverticulum ; etiology ; Drainage ; methods ; Humans ; Hypospadias ; surgery ; Incidence ; Male ; Retrospective Studies ; Stents ; Urethra ; surgery ; Urethral Stricture ; etiology ; Urinary Catheterization ; instrumentation ; methods

PURPOSE: We review our experience using a new and easily removable ureteral catheter in patients who underwent complicated ureteral reimplantation. Our goal was to shorten hospital stay and lower anxiety during catheter removal without fear of postoperative ureteral obstruction. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between April 2009 and September 2010, nine patients who underwent our new method of catheter removal after ureteral reimplantation were enrolled. Patients who underwent simple ureteral reimplantation were excluded from the study. Following ureteral reimplantation, a combined drainage system consisting of a suprapubic cystostomy catheter and a ureteral catheter was installed. Proximal external tubing was clamped with a Hem-o-lok clamp and the rest of the external tubing was eliminated. Data concerning the age and sex of each patient, reason for operation, method of ureteral reimplantation, and postoperative parameters such as length of hospital stay and complications were recorded. RESULTS: Of the nine patients, four had refluxing megaureter, four had a solitary or non-functional contralateral kidney and one had ureteral stricture due to a previous anti-reflux operation. The catheter was removed at postoperative week one. The mean postoperative hospital stay was 2.4 days (range 1-4 days), and the mean follow-up was 9.8 months. None of the patients had postoperative ureteral obstructions, and there were no cases of migration or dislodgement of the catheter. CONCLUSION: Our new method for removing the ureteral catheter would shorten hospital stays and lower levels of anxiety when removing ureteral catheters in patients with a high risk of postoperative ureteral obstruction.
Catheterization/*instrumentation/methods ; Child ; Child, Preschool ; Female ; Humans ; Infant ; Length of Stay ; Male ; Postoperative Care ; Postoperative Complications/epidemiology ; Postoperative Period ; Retrospective Studies ; *Urinary Catheters ; Vesico-Ureteral Reflux/surgery

Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) is a patient-centered, surgeon-led system combining anesthesia, nursing, nutrition and psychology. It aims to minimize surgical stress and maintain physiological function in perioperative care, thereby expediting recovery. ERAS theory has been clinically applied for nearly 20 years and it is firstly used in colorectal surgery, then widely used in other surgical fields. However, ERAS is not used commonly in esophagectomy because of its surgical complexity and high morbidity of postoperative complications, which limits the application of ERAS in the field of esophagectomy. In recent years, with the increasing maturation of minimally invasive esophagectomy, attention to tissue and organ protection concept, improvement of making gastric tube, breakthrough of anastomosis technique, and the presentation and application of new concepts, ERAS has made great progress in the field of esophagectomy. This article summarizes some ERAS measures in the treatment of esophageal cancer based on evidence-based medicine, and performs an effective ERAS mode for clinical application of esophagectomy. During preoperative preparation and evaluation, we propose preoperative education and nutrition evaluation without regular intestinal preparation, and advocate preemptive analgesia without preanesthetic medication. During intra-operative management, anesthesia scheme should be optimized, fluid transfusion should be controlled properly, suitable operation mode should be chosen, and intraoperative hypothermia should be avoided. During postoperative management, sufficient analgesia should be administered with non-opioid analgesics, drainage tube placement must be decreased and removed earlier, urinary catheter and gastrointestinal decompression tube should be removed earlier, and oral intake and ambulation should be resumed as early as possible. "Received surgery yesterday, oral intake today, discharged home 5-7 days", ERAS program based on "non tube no fasting" has been applied in some medical centers and becomes more and more maturation. In the future, we will rely on the increasing improvement and systemic training of ERAS mode in order to promote such application in more medical centers. With the multi-center clinical trials, based on constant enrichments and improvements, a general expert consensus will be made finally.
Analgesia ; methods ; Anesthesia, General ; methods ; Decompression, Surgical ; instrumentation ; methods ; Drainage ; instrumentation ; methods ; Esophageal Neoplasms ; rehabilitation ; surgery ; Esophagectomy ; methods ; psychology ; rehabilitation ; Evidence-Based Medicine ; Feeding Methods ; Humans ; Length of Stay ; Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures ; methods ; rehabilitation ; Nutritional Status ; Patient Education as Topic ; methods ; Perioperative Care ; methods ; Urinary Catheterization ; methods ; Walking