1.ureteroscopic Stone Extraction ; 78 cases.
Korean Journal of Urology 1990;31(4):529-532
Ureteroscopic stone extraction is popular method for the management of ureteral stone after innovative development of rigid ureteroscope. A sequential analysis of the clinical study revealed that during the first 39 cases success rate was 56.4 %. Within the latter 39 cases success rate was 92.3%. Complication included ureteral perforation in 2 cases (2.7% ), fever more than 38 degrees C in 2 (2.7%). Although E.S.W.L. is the mainstream of method of management for ureteral stone, ureteroscopic stone extraction is choice for urologist where E.S.W.L. is not available or when patient refuses E.S.W.L.
Fever
;
Humans
;
Ureter
;
Ureteroscopes
2.Design and validation of a non-biological 3D printed pelvocalyceal system (RIRS BOX) for simulation-based training of flexible ureteroscopy: A stage 2A surgical innovation study.
Philippine Journal of Urology 2020;30(1):49-55
:
In the field of Urology, flexible ureterorenoscopy (fURS) remains a challenging skill for junior residents to develop due to its steep learning curve. Hence, training models were incorporated into simulation-based training to allow for novice trainees to overcome the learning curve without potentially compromising patient outcomes and minimize complications.
OBJECTIVE:
To describe the design and test the validity of a non-biological three-dimensional (3D) model of the pelvocalyceal system as a tool for simulation-based training for flexible ureterorenoscopy.
METHODS:
This was a prospective, quasi-experimental, surgical innovation research stage 2a study conducted in a tertiary government hospital. The retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) box was composed of four siliconized pelvocalyceal systems which were 3D printed using computed tomography urograms of actual patients. Thirty-two urologists were asked to perform flexible ureteroscopy using the RIRS box and were given a questionnaire to assess face and content validity using the Likert scale.
RESULTS:
The RIRS Box training model showed good face and content validity. The 3D printed pelvocalyceal system was judged to have a close anatomical resemblance to an actual calyceal system. While performing fURS, the RIRS box provided similar pelvocalyceal visualization and instrument handling as in an actual procedure. Majority of participants considered the training model useful for training (75%) and believed that it may improve the RIRS technique (46.8%).
CONCLUSION
The RIRS Box training model may help urologists improve the manner in which they acquire technical knowledge and skills necessary in performing fURS.
Ureteroscopy
;
Ureteroscopes
;
Printing, Three-Dimensional
3.Management of Lower Ureteral Calculi Using Rigid Ureteroscope.
Kyung Soo CHOI ; Dong Seong KIM ; In Goo KIM ; Hi Yung SHIM ; Han Yong CHOI
Korean Journal of Urology 1990;31(1):94-98
Since January 1988 a group of 54 patients presenting with stone in the lower third of the ureter have been treated with rigid ureteroscope. In 47 cases(87 per cent) the stone was removed successfully. The associated number of complication was low, with most patients being treated conservatively. Our results confirm the safety and efficiency of ureteroscopy to manage the lower ureteral stones.
Humans
;
Ureter*
;
Ureteral Calculi*
;
Ureteroscopes*
;
Ureteroscopy
4.Clinical Experience of Ureteroscopic Stone Manipulation.
Korean Journal of Urology 1996;37(4):426-432
To define indications of primary treatment in ureteroscopic stone manipulation with comparing the success rates and complications of A(11.5F rigid ureteroscopy from March 1989 to April 1993) and B(7.5F rigid ureteroscopy from May 1993 to February 1995) groups, 216 ureteroscopies were performed for ureteral stone removal between March 1989 and February 1995 in our urologic department. The overall success rates of ureteroscopic stone manipulation were obtained and compared according to stone locations, sizes and anesthesia or not. The overall success rate was 85.6%(80% in group A and 94.2% in group B respectively). The success rates in each group A and B were 60% and 77.8% in the upper ureter, 100% and 66.7% in the middle ureter, 80.0% and 95.9% in the lower ureter. There were the more success rates and the less complication rates in group B than group A. The success rates of stone removal are increased and the complications are decreased remarkably in group B(especially in the lower ureter stone). The rapid relief of ureteral obstruction and colic is possible immediately after ureteroscopic stone manipulation. So, we conclude that ureteroscopic stone manipulation is primarily indicated in the treatment of lower ureteral stones.
Anesthesia
;
Colic
;
Ureter
;
Ureteral Obstruction
;
Ureteroscopes
;
Ureteroscopy
5.Ureteroscopic stone removal.
Byung Jin LEE ; Young Gon KIM ; Young Kyung PARK
Korean Journal of Urology 1992;33(2):272-275
Rigid ureteroscopy is now established technique for the management of ureteral stones. We evaluated the experiences of rigid ureteroscopy retrospectively at our institutions from October 1990 to June 1991, 30 ureteroscopies were performed for the removal of ureteral stones and one ureteroscopy for the removal of Kock pouch stones. In 23 cases(74.2%), the stones were removed successfully. The likelihood of failure was greater for stones larger than 10mm and above the lower ureter. Among the reasons for failure to remove stones. the failure to insert the ureteroscope into the ureteral orifice was the most common. Complications were developed in 11 cases but managed conservatively in all cases. We agree that ureteroscopic removal of stone is the treatment of choice for lower ureteral stone of smaller than 10mm in size with proven efficacy and safety.
Colonic Pouches
;
Retrospective Studies
;
Ureter
;
Ureteroscopes
;
Ureteroscopy
6.Experience of Ureteroscopic Removal of Stone.
Korean Journal of Urology 1988;29(4):543-547
Ureteroscopy is the newer procedure for the treatment of ureteral calculi, and now established the first treatment of ureteral calculi. A study of 42 cases of ureteroscopic removal of stones was performed. Removal of stones was successful in 29 of 42 attempts(69 percent). 26 of 31 patients with lower ureteral calculi (84 percent) and 26 of 35 patients with calculi smaller than 1 cm(74 percent) underwent successful removal. There were no significant complications during or after the procedure. In conclusion, ureteroscopic removal of stones can be the first choice of treatment of ureteral calculi, and proper technique, surgical skill and prudence are essential prerequisites and increase experience will improve the success rate.
Calculi
;
Humans
;
Ureteral Calculi
;
Ureteroscopes
;
Ureteroscopy
7.Two-year Experiences of Ureteral Stones: SWL Versus Ureteroscopic Manipulation.
Minsu PARK ; Hyungkeun PARK ; Taehan PARK
Korean Journal of Urology 1998;39(9):879-884
PURPOSE: Shockwave lithotripsy(SWL) and ureteroscopic manipulation became the standard treatments for ureteral stones in recent years. There still exists significant debate as to the most appropriate treatment modality for ureteral stone management. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From January 1994 to December 1995, 651 patients of ureteral stones were treated and 589 patients were retrospectively reviewed excluding 62 patients for incomplete follow ups. Four hundred and forty-two patients were treated with SWL using MPL 9000 with ultrasonic guidance, 115 patients with ureteroscopic manipulation using 7.9 to 11.5Fr rigid and semirigid ureteroscopes. RESULTS: In SWL treatments, overall stone free rate was 74.7% with one session, Stone free rate was significantly affected by the size of stones. Stone free rate was 83.6% when the stone was smaller than 1.0cm and 42.1% when the stone was larger than 1.0cm Stone free rate after second SWL session was 84.4% and 90.3% after third session. The stone free rates according to the site of stones were 72.4(proximal), 70.0(mid), 80.2(distal), respectively. In ureteroscopic manipulation, overall stone free rate of 87.8% was obtained regardless of the size of stones. The success rates according to the location of stones were 75.0(proximal), 94.6(mid), 86.4%(distal), respectively. Open ureterolithotomy was performed in 32 patients with 100% success rate. CONCLUSIONS: In our study, the size of stones was the most important factor influencing the success rate of SWL treatment for ureteral stones. We consider ureteroscopic manipulation as the first line treatment modality when the stone is larger than 1.0cm, especially in distal ureter, Proper selection of patients for in situ SWL or ureteroscopy would improve the results of initial treatment.
Follow-Up Studies
;
Humans
;
Retrospective Studies
;
Ultrasonics
;
Ureter*
;
Ureteroscopes
;
Ureteroscopy
8.A case of fibroepithelial polyp of the ureter.
Sang Jong LEE ; Geun Ha LIM ; Eui Hun JOUNG ; Sang Tai KO ; Ki Yong SHIN ; Young Taik HAN
Korean Journal of Urology 1991;32(4):685-687
Fibroepithelial polyp of the ureter is a extremely rare benign tumor which is mesodermal origin. It should be suspected preoperatively in cases with a long history of loin pain or hematuria, or both, in a younger patient with the radiologic finding of long ureteric filling defect. Unfortunately. in the majority of cases reviewed. the diagnosis was not made preoperatively but the diagnostic confirmation was made intraoperatively or postoperatively. Herein, we report a case of fibroepithelial polyp or the ureter which was diagnosed preoperatively with ureteroscope. The management was local segmental excision and end-to-end anastomosis of the ureter.
Diagnosis
;
Hematuria
;
Humans
;
Mesoderm
;
Polyps*
;
Ureter*
;
Ureteroscopes
;
Ureteroscopy
9.A case of fibroepithelial polyp of the ureter.
Sang Jong LEE ; Geun Ha LIM ; Eui Hun JOUNG ; Sang Tai KO ; Ki Yong SHIN ; Young Taik HAN
Korean Journal of Urology 1991;32(4):685-687
Fibroepithelial polyp of the ureter is a extremely rare benign tumor which is mesodermal origin. It should be suspected preoperatively in cases with a long history of loin pain or hematuria, or both, in a younger patient with the radiologic finding of long ureteric filling defect. Unfortunately. in the majority of cases reviewed. the diagnosis was not made preoperatively but the diagnostic confirmation was made intraoperatively or postoperatively. Herein, we report a case of fibroepithelial polyp or the ureter which was diagnosed preoperatively with ureteroscope. The management was local segmental excision and end-to-end anastomosis of the ureter.
Diagnosis
;
Hematuria
;
Humans
;
Mesoderm
;
Polyps*
;
Ureter*
;
Ureteroscopes
;
Ureteroscopy
10.Ureteroscopic Removal of Stone: Results and Complications.
Chang Su JUNG ; Soon Chan KIM ; Sam Keuk NAM
Korean Journal of Urology 1998;39(10):952-956
PURPOSE: This study examined the efficacy of ureteroscopic stone manipulation with comparing the success rates and complications rates. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The manipulation of calculi can be done under the direct vision of ureteroscope using dormia baskets with increasing safety and efficacy. The results of ureteroscopic removal of stones were reviewed in 636 cases. From January 1992 to October 1997, 636 patients underwent ureteroscopic removal of stones. RESULTS: There were 236 female and 400 male patients between 16 and 75 years old. The success rates of ureteroscopic removal of stones were related to location of the calculus: 95.8% in lower ureter, 87.7% in mid ureter and 90% in upper ureter(overall success rate was 95%). 35 cases(5.8%) of complication occurred in 604 cases of success: Severe ureteral mucosal injury in 25 patients, gross hematuria(>48hours) in 4 patients, ureteral mucosal prolapse in 3 patients, flank pain(>48hours) in 2 patients, ureteral perforation in 1 patient. CONCLUSIONS: Ureteroscopic removal of stones can be successful and safe treatment modality for lower urethral stones, especially with plentiful experience and good surgical skill.
Aged
;
Calculi
;
Female
;
Humans
;
Male
;
Prolapse
;
Ureter
;
Ureteroscopes
;
Ureteroscopy